the word hypocrisy suits the situation better.

as for PS3 being on a roll, thats very understandable, Sony has a much stronger lineup of first party devs, you are talking about industry veterans here such as Sucker punch, polyphony digital, naughty dog and studio japan among others. these devs literally helped shape the industry, MS's biggest first party dev was bungie, and they left. 343 while a good dev team, hasnt really proved them selfs to be amazing. then you have turn 10, which have proved them selfs to be a good racing dev. and then who? lionhead? their previous games speak for them selfs. First party devs are really the ones who can maintain the steady flow of games through out a consoles life. Worldwide studios was established in 2005, which explains the reason of the lackluster first party lineup on the ps3 the first two years or so. once sony got their shit together with worldwide studios they destroyed MS in games in term of both quality and quantity. 

Please do some research before posting. Have you played the game? In what game are they similar? Should some Mario games not be considered exclusives becaue they're very similar to previous Mario games? What about COD games?

inb4 "but...but...Halo 4 sold more than all ps3 exclusives combined!"

Meanwhile every exclusive announced my Microsoft is 100% confirmed to come out right? I don't think their track records are going to be that different.

I still don't see Sony cancelling 73% of their PS4 exclusives currently in development.

you are acting like microsoft never announced a game and canceled it. what about these games?

thats matter in case you dont know it, its a kinect game that microsoft announced in E3 2012, you know that tittle that was being developed by the Pirates of the caribbean director. i cant seem to find it anywhere, hmmmm. 

what about this?

i remember the big fuss about this one back when it was announced. 

really dude, its getting really embarrassing for you, just give it a rest. 

The problem is you can't just change some wording around and then try to pass it off like this list is legit.

We have seen Halo and Fable on PC. So by the list logic those games are no longer exlcusive to Microsoft. What is BS is that Microsofts CHOOSES to have a good portion of their games go to PC for obvious reasons. Hell Major Nelson promotes their Xbox Games on STEAM all the time. Alan Wake and Dust are 2 examples. Why would he do that if Xbox was competing with PC in terms of games sales?

because thats when the Kinect and Move launched....Its showing the switch that MS focused more on casuals and Sony focused more on Hardcore.

Lets hope this isn't an indication of how the xbone is going to turn out....Nice games everyone wants for 2-3 years then once they know the hardcores have brought the console they switch to casual mode :/

It is BS really. Because we are taking 3rd party Kinect games and using that as a basis to why Microsoft stopped developing Core games. Please tell me how it is logical to list over 40 Kinect games while Microsoft Published/Developed 14 of them and say Microsoft was all about Kinect? They didn't force Activision. EA, and Ubisoft to make games for the thing. So just becaue they are listed for Kinect Microsoft gets knocked for other people making the games for it.

So we can include 3rd party kinect games that Miicrosoft has no ties to except Kinect, but we can't list Fable 3 (a Microsoft owned IP that went to PC), Splinter Cell, and Alan Wake.

EDIT: Also how many games on Sony's side didn't release in NA?

Why arent any of the Kinect/Move games considered core?