Yeah.  But there's a difference between a port and a remake.  All of the PS3 games you listed were pretty much the same games they were on PS2 with better resolution.  Fable is supposed to be totally remade with new stuff, just like Halo Anniversary.  But, like I said, it's not my list.

I've always compared consoles like this:  Count everything.  If PS3 has 102 titles and Xbox has 100, they all count.  Full library vs. full library.  Doesn't matter which ones are exclusive or not.  I'm sure the Wii has more exclusives since 2006.  The multi-plats on either of the HD twins makes them the better choice than any number of Wii exclusives the Wii might have.  A comparison like this would make a game like Tomb Raider obsolete since it's multi-plat.  Compare one system's whole library vs. one system's whole library if you're comparing two systems.  If I were only buying either the PS3 or the Xbox 360 and I felt like playing Splinter Cell Conviction, it shouldn't matter if it's also on the PC.  It should only matter that, of the two consoles, there's only one of the two that has the game I wanted.  But hey, to each his own.

an unannounced exclusive doesnt exist.

even announced ones sometimes dont exist.

I agree, to an extent.

I think this list should include XBLA and PSN as well. However, with PC/XBox titles, they are and should be considered multiplatform.

Ps3/Vita too?

Sure, why not? The game isn't PS3 only.

What hobby? Coding for Sony/MS? That's the only way this makes sense.

The damage control is strong with you.

Then I agree with you. 360/PC aren't exclusives.