Core exclusives Sony (PS3) Vs MS (X360).

[Euphoria14]

attaboy said:

Euphoria14 said:

attaboy said:
Man. PS3 trounced the 360 when it comes to exclusives! I don't think they should have included games that haven't even released yet on the PS3 side (Beyond) and not do the same on the Xbox side (Fable Anniversary) but hey, it's not my list. I'm a PS3 owner and I haven't even heard of some of those PS3 games! This list is good for the purpose it serves but I'm also a 360 owner. I love it, too.

List doesn't include ports or remakes, which is why it also does not include the God of War Collections, Ratchet Collections, Sly, Jak, etc...

Yeah.  But there's a difference between a port and a remake.  All of the PS3 games you listed were pretty much the same games they were on PS2 with better resolution.  Fable is supposed to be totally remade with new stuff, just like Halo Anniversary.  But, like I said, it's not my list.

I've always compared consoles like this:  Count everything.  If PS3 has 102 titles and Xbox has 100, they all count.  Full library vs. full library.  Doesn't matter which ones are exclusive or not.  I'm sure the Wii has more exclusives since 2006.  The multi-plats on either of the HD twins makes them the better choice than any number of Wii exclusives the Wii might have.  A comparison like this would make a game like Tomb Raider obsolete since it's multi-plat.  Compare one system's whole library vs. one system's whole library if you're comparing two systems.  If I were only buying either the PS3 or the Xbox 360 and I felt like playing Splinter Cell Conviction, it shouldn't matter if it's also on the PC.  It should only matter that, of the two consoles, there's only one of the two that has the game I wanted.  But hey, to each his own.

I agree, to an extent.

I think this list should include XBLA and PSN as well. However, with PC/XBox titles, they are and should be considered multiplatform.