Your post is so full of bias and ignorance....

So it is your supposition that GZ set out to murder himself "...some innocent kid in a hoodie"? Why did he even bother to call the police then?

Just because you carry a gun does not mean you intend on using the gun. Many people carry guns and never use them or even pull them out. This includes law inforcement and members of the military. Getting into a physical confrontation and having your head punched into a sidewalk (witness saw TM on top of GZ) would certainly suggest that TM never even knew GZ had a gun (showing he never pulled it out before the altercation) which goes to show why TM did not run home or even leave the area completely or call the police himself and why GZ felt as though his own life was in jeopardy (what if after beating GZ TM had found the gun?)

This isn't all to say GZ is innocent or that he didn't assault TM first and then lost the upper hand only to shoot TM. That could have happened. The problem is we DON"T know!!! And if we started convicting people based on conflicting stories as opposed to the evidence and presumption of innocence before guilt then our Justice System IS truly fucked.

this seemed pretty fitting for the thread. Not the part about the hoody, but how the race baiting is going on, and how people should act rational.


http://www.infowars.com/niece-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-would-not-wear-a-hoodie/


“There was a reasonable doubt in that case,” she said. “So the case went the ways of the laws of this land, but now we need to go further and look at the human heart.”

Dr. King also called out the mongers in the media and elsewhere who are trying to spin the verdict into racial tensions between Caucasians and African-Americans.

“As far as trying to fit the Caucasians against African-Americans, Mr. Zimmerman is a Hispanic,” she said. “Although we are one blood, one human family, one human race, there’s a lot of deception and emotion in these things that are being spurred.”

“Mr. Zimmerman is not a Caucasian. He’s not.”

Even when her uncle was assassinated in 1968, Dr. King said that it wasn’t fair to blame it on Caucasians.

Right before her father left home in order to retrieve the body of the slain civil rights leader, she said she stood in the kitchen ranting, “I hate white people!”

“Alveda, white people did not kill your uncle,” Dr. King’s father said to her as he held her in his arms. “The devil did.”

From that experience, Dr. King learned to answer violent tragedies with love, not hate.

“We answer with reason,” she said. “We answer with sanity.”

Its weird that I bring up skin color because dark skin and dark night isn't relevant? Like your thought process for this whole thing is obviously "make a judgement and use reverse logic to back it up and only use the poor evidnece that back ups my claim"

You are assuming a whole lot that GZ would hear anything. Like it is mind boggling how you come to your conclusions. You are so convinced with what you say is true but have nothing to back it up. No. GZ probably wouldnt have heard anything. I don't even know where you get your information from.

You know bushes have 4 sides and "right up against the house" is only one side and the side facing the sidewalk is another side... that leaves two sides.... One is usually against the fence... oh look I found a side not up against anything that could easily be hidden behind. Oh yeah he would have seen trayvon approach him from behind /rolls eyes.

There is no use in this conversation because you made up your mind already. In the other thread before you knew anything you said "oh this case doesn't make sense because of such and such" then you come up with Jeantels testimony and all of a sudden you are convinced that GZ was guity.

We also know that trayvon was kicked out of his home because of problems with his mom. We also know he was getting in fights through text messages. We also know Trayvon was dealing through texts. We also know he was looking to find a gun illegally.... through texts.

I didn't know thats what GZ was arrested for. LOL no wonder those charges were dropped

Hmmm...

I forgot all about this

Why did you wait this long to reply back? Why are you Still trying to go on and on about this? 

You really can't handle my opinion and speculation on this huh?

This really bothers you THAT much, Max?

This convo has BEEN over..

Crazy how these two became champions like they did.  On one hand, we have a weed smoking, suspended, bag full of possibly stolen jewelry having dead kid.  On the other hand, we have a gun toting, lying (like how he and his wife lied about money using secret codes) domestic violence/cop assaulting guy.

Somehow, the country divided itself amongst these two.  I think we were all bamboozled.

I waited this long because you people need to be educated.

Educated about what?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDAQqQIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FUS%2Fgeorge-zimmerman-emerged-hiding-rescue-family-trapped-suv%2Fstory%3Fid%3D19735432&ei=n-ztUeqqGYPAyAGs44A4&usg=AFQjCNFPcH7dy8KM--4dN8i1LFj6nW1l_w&sig2=zM8DHK7rsPzBO62HvU6gUQ&bvm=bv.49641647,d.aWc

George Zimmerman has saved 5 lives in 29 years... what a great guy

Well, regardless of the wording in this situation, the end result is still that dispatch can not issue legally binding orders. They are not officiers of the law...whether they suggested or flat out told him not to he had no obligation to listen and therefore even if he did follow him he did nothing illegal at this point...so the wording does not matter in this situation...the only way that Zimmerman could have been in the wrong is if he assaulted Treyvon, which there is no evidence to suggest...at any rate Zimmerman did nothing illegal in this situation that could be proved to a reasonable standard.