My understanding is that Zimmerman lost track of where Martin was and had stopped to, supposedly, get an address. I'm not sure what him driving has anything to do with it. If someone is driving slowly through a neighborhood, a person on foot could easily ditch them. Once he had gotten out of the car, there is zero chance Zimmerman could have caught Martin (no racist).

Thats my point, if Zimmerman lost Trayvan right,  Zimmerman didnt go back to his car though? how was he the one ambushed?

I'm not sure what you're asking. He was on foot when he and Martin had their confrontation.

Because he was looking for the boy.......he started it........that's my point.

If Trayvan had gone to the car pulled out Zimmerman and tried to fight, I would agree with you. But Zimmerman didnt want him to get away, he looked for him, confronted him and probably tried to hold him for the cops. But, Trayvan fought back, hit him and knocked him down, once down Zimmerman panicked, took out the gun and shot him. 

There is no "probably" about it. You're making a pretty big assumption there and could easily be wrong.

Let's assume that Zimmerman was lying about getting an address because his neighborhood was pretty small and he should have known exactly where he was.  So he's still looking for Martin, but Martin could have slipped him and taken a vantage point where he could see Zimmerman but Zimmerman couldn't see him. Then when Martin saw that the guy was shorter and fatter than he was and was out of shape (Zimmerman was out of breath on the phone), he could have decided, fuck it, he'll mess this guy up. And he jumps out as Zimmerman said and asks, "You got a problem?" Zimmerman is surprised and says no, he doesn't have a problem. "You do now." Bam, Martin hits him.

Now that may or may not be what happened, but it's certainly plausible. The jury couldn't rule that out beyond a reasonable doubt because it is consistent with a lot of the evidence at hand.

What do you mean "a fight ensues"? A physical fight magically ensues?

A thug starts to beat an innocent man. Then the man shoots in self defense according to right of law. There's indisputable evidence of that since one man was injured in the face and backhead and the other one was not.

"8 black men killed over the Christmas holiday by other black men, and these people didn't have one rally in their honor.... but, as soon as these negroes can blame a murder on a white person... oh here they come."

Lmao! That dude snapped XD!

This guy is on the right track but i think he probably came to the wrong conclusion based on the 1st minute

It's all about this mental racial divide. Its the best way to control a population besides fear

The racial divide is perfect with this case when looked at from the surface. A black teen was shot by a "white" man who thought he looked suspicious.

It's effective because each race plays the victim. Just sit back and watch or listen to the arguments. It's litterally THE SAME EXACT arguments on each side and it creates this mindless spiral of constant racism that low-key keeps black people mad at white people and white people mad at black people

Watch from 9:30. It's crisp clear what happened.

Prepare to be disappointed...again.

You lost the case. You've made it very clear that you're upset by the verdict. (You shouldn't be if you had actually watched the trial and know anything about law).

You've referred to Trayvon as an innocent kid - he wasn't. The moment he attacked Zimmerman, that's assault. Nothing innocent about assault. We don't even need to mention his rather lengthy history of criminal mischief. 

Mad?