Exclusive from Sony and Nintendo have a long lasting appeal for years to come.
Most third party titles I play, always feel rush or just lackluster.

CGI-Quality said: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=162427&page=1# I already posted this and got FAR less responses.

Oops, sorry. My title was more enticing. :p

This can be locked I don't mind.

I find it ironic that his own statements could be used against him. Make better games that isn't MARIO so I can purchase them :)

edit: aren't lul

And that would help them in this situation _____________________________.

Thanks for posting this.  This is exactly my stance on it.  I was having this conversation with my friend the other day.

When a great game comes out, I want to play it as soon as possible.  A great game in this case is one that caters to my gaming interests and whose quality has been validated by media and peers in the gaming community.  Since I want it ASAP, I buy it new.  I may also buy it new simply because I feel the developer and publisher deserve to get the money rather than GameStop pocketing a used game margin.  I'm trying to encourage them to make more games like this.

When I finish it, if I agree that it's the masterpiece I thought it was going to be, I'll keep it.  It's a showpiece in my collection, something I can't wait to show friends who have never played it, and something I'll dust off down the road to relive a great experience.

If a game comes out that I'm interested in but not dying to play, I may wait on it a bit and buy it after a price drop.  If reviews from the industry and my peers are poor, my interest drops further and it becomes a game that I may get in between new releases, but that I'll likely buy used.  I'll go to GameStop, round up a few on that list, try them, and sell back the ones that are shit.  I buy them used to discourage the developer/publisher from releasing more shitty games and give the revenue to GameStop to reward them for the opportunity they've given me to try a borderline game at less than full price.

If one of those borderline games becomes a favorite of mine, I'm hooked into buying the next iteration new, and at the very least I'm recommending the game to my friends.

Glad Nintendo gets it.

      Hmmm. Makes sense to me. Battlefield 4  is your typical rehased FPS garbage.  Not touching that crap. BF3 was OK, but the campaign just sucked.   Go Nintendo for saying it the way it is.

Battle field 4 is not your typical rhashed FPS garbage, when you can literally shoot a building down a skyscrapper down with rockets and stuff, and it looks almost photo realistic on ps4....

lol.

And I strongly agree Reggie!

This would have been so great if delivered at an e3 presser. Nintendo really dropped the ball not letting this guy talk with an audience. The ND should have been for Japan only.