By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - X's Graphics are just increibly amazing!!

dahuman on 12 June 2013
artur-fernand said:
dahuman said:
artur-fernand said:

So far, X is the only game that I'll really miss next-gen, since I'm planning to get a PS4. That, and the inevitable Metroid, which god knows when it'll be released.
And I haven't even played Xenoblade yet, but I'm impressed by both games. Xenoblade doesn't give a fuck it's on the Wii.
DAMN YOU MONOLITH!


It's a Nintendo 1st party studio.... it's like saying "DAMN YOU NINTENDO FOR RELEASING A GAME THAT YOU MADE ON YOUR OWN CONSOLE ONLY!" O_O;

Yeah, I'm aware Monolith belongs to Nintendo. I said "Damn you" in a more ironic way, i.e., "damn you for making me slightly desire the Wii U right now". =P


lol okie



Around the Network
naruball on 12 June 2013
JazzB1987 said:
naruball said:
Well, in my opinion, it does look good, but nowhere near as good as next generation games, epsecially MGSV.
Several ps3 games look just as good to me.

At any rate, it stilll looks great, which should be the point, not silly comparisons, right?


MGSV  I agree

PS3 games   hahaha good one  next time dont look at the Nintendo direct using a GBA screen   thanks.

Dont mix up huge scale and good graphics with   corridor games that have similar graphics. Its like saying  the floaty Mario 64 face you could manipulate looked like PS2 games.

The first PS3 game that might rival  X  wil l be GTA5.  RDR for example looks worse. (has 20-30 fps, low res textures, and simple terrain)


No need to make assumptions. I watched it on youtube in the best quality available. Unlike you, I won't make the assumption that you haven't played ps3 games with impressive graphics, but games like God of War 3 and Ascension and Uncharted 2 and 3 looked just as good, if not better to me. Feel free to disagree, but this is my opinion. I obviously haven't played X (while I have played both gow and uncharted and wathced videos of them), but this is the impression I got.

I know that I'm talking about different genres, but in terms of being impressed by a game's graphics, I think X looks good, but not Next Generation. It's called an opinion for a reason. No need to get defensive.

Edit: if I ever buy a WiiU and X, I won't get it for its graphics, but for its gameplay which looks fun. Its graphics didn't impress me. That's all.



JazzB1987 on 12 June 2013
pr3st00 said:
Looks very nice. I really hope WiiU starts getting titles like this, I would hate to see Nintendo failing.


Off topic. 

What kind of Gameboy model is in your signature?  I am asking because it seems to have Rumble.


naruball said:
JazzB1987 said:
naruball said:

I know that I'm talking about different genres, but in terms of being impressed by a game's graphics, I think X looks good, but not Next Generation. It's called an opinion for a reason. No need to get defensive.

 

Thats the problem I have. You cannot have an opinion here at all. There is no next gen open world jrpg you can compare X to. And it looks better than any current gen jRPG no matter if corridor or open world. (I am not talking about art style  IMHO Anime looks better than realism but that doesnt define real better looking games)

So how did you end up with your opinion that X does not look next gen?     I mean if it looks better than current gen jRPGs what is it?

I agree that it does not look like a next gen Shooter but you cannot say it does not look next gen open world jRPG because you can't base that statment off of anything. There simply is no open world jRPG to compare it to.

I just want logic nothing else.  (I am related to Mr Spock)


I know that PS4 and Xbone open world jRPGs will most likely look better  and I am okay with that  its just normal.



DieAppleDie on 12 June 2013

looks great for the first gen of WiiU games, actually, why isnt ppl more shocked about MK8 WHICH LOOKS FREAKING AMAZING?



dahuman on 12 June 2013
trixiemafia86 said:
dahuman said:
trixiemafia86 said:
dahuman said:
VGKing said:
 

Yes, I do. inFamous Second Son is one example. I suggest you take a look at the new gameplay trailer. There's a huge difference so stop lying to yourself

Then there's the 3rd party games such as The Division and Destiny and Titan. Those have next-gen elements that are more than just graphics.

Other than the higher res, the biggest improvement is actually lighting so far since the PS4 actually has the resources to pull it off now, this whole next gen thing has a lot of emphasis on lighting from what I can see so far which isn't saying much yet. I honestly think that we won't see anything mind blowing for awhile IMO, but I'm used to PC graphics though, we've had that kind of lighting for awhile if the game supports it on PC.

I'm used to PC graphics too but I think it looks really impressive. Maybe it's because its not an FPS I guess. Too many FPS "powerhouses" on PC

It's the lighting man, the lighting has really improved a lot because they have the resources to do it now, and that's a really good thing.

Yeah.

Off topic - Nice specs. Which games currently push your PC in 1080P

Planetside 2 maxed is unplayable at like 15 FPS or lower lol, I'm talking like super maxed inf file changing max lol, otherwise like 20s-30s with ingame max, but since I need to cap people, I do low everything and set rendering and texture to max ingame to get about 80FPS that way(for better IRV.) Rest of the games I generally don't have a problem with unless they were coded like shit. Guild Wars 2 can actually be taxing for a single card maxed out but crossfire is 60FPS with vsync. I haven't tried Metro Last Light yet, waiting on Steam sale. Tomb Raider used to perform pretty bad but after a few patches, FPS is good with that hair thing on. I'm waiting for 2014 to update my video card(s), got these when the 7xxx series weren't even out yet and it will show it's age soon when PC graphics hit the next level with these new consoles.



Around the Network
Ji99saw on 12 June 2013
JazzB1987 said:
Ji99saw said:
Why don't people just admit that the Wii U is weak and move on their life. At best it's slightly more powerful and at worst it's on par with PS360. No one asked Nintendo to cheap out on hardware and specs for a controller gimmick, but I love how during the Wii years graphics didn't matter and now Nintendo fans are trying desperately to convince everyone that X is equal/better than the games X1 and PS4 showed lol... Stop lying to yourselves


Dyslexia much?  (chill  please that was just a question)
Where do Nintendo fans say graphics  dont matter at all?  They say they are not that important. But its still nice to have them.  

Or where do they say X looks better than same type of game on Xbone and PS4?  You cant compare an open world  niche-genre-JRPG title  to stuff like  MGSV or GTA5. Or to corridor shooters or whatever. Or even to "small area" jRPGs like FF games that usually have battle mode specific character models so the game looks better than it is.

 And as of yet there is no  console JRPG that looks better than X = FACT. (stuff like FF13 = corridor crap)   NiNoKuni = Cell shading =  low polycount simple visuals/textures etc etc. 
Thats what people say here. X looks incredible for what it is  and then competitors fanboys come here and say "IT DOES NOT  look at SECOND SON that looks insane blah." 

SecondSon looks good but not mindblowing because you have to think about several aspects. Its running on a more powerful console, it is an action game those have always higher budgets than those low budget JRPGs because jRPG = niche. So it is just normal for an action game to look good  whereas X looks better than people expected from a WiiU jrpg. That is all they said and yet others believe (believe and not think because that has nothing to do with thinking at all) they have to disagree.


And since you like pointing with the fingers:
PS1 fans: "graphics dont matter"   Ps2 fans: " graphics dont matter"   PS3 fans: "we ArRr  ze bestestestest".    
So please


Fact is. 
Ps360 people come  and say "WiiU looks like SHIT!"  Nintendo fans come and say "It does not look like SHIT it looks good not as good as PS4 but good"

So whats the problem? If people dont like defensive Nintendo fans get out of Nintendo threads and stop annoying their fans. Dont give them a reason to defend and everyone will be happy.

And btw. it's more like PS360 people should get over it and move on with their lives  not Nintendo fans like you say.... but instead of minding their own business they  SEEM to compesate whatever with bashing a weaker system. I thought their consoles are so great etc? How do they find the time to troll Nintendo fans all the time? It is beyond me.

Everyone knows that WiiU is weaker. So whats the point of acting like a broken record and repeating shit all the time?

Fact is also  WiiU is more powerful than PS360 not just slightly  the GPU alone kills the PS360.  It is alot weaker than PS4 and Xbone but noone ever denied that no matter how much you or other people want to believe that.


P.S. Evem tho I said PS360 most of the time I am actually just talking about the fanbase that always wins "worst fanboy awards" on most websites.

You obviously don't know what dyslexia is, so please spare me your ignorant insults and respond to me with substance or not at all. You just wrote a long letter proving everything I said correct so you have now wasted both our times. At the end of the day Wii U is weak and nothing is going to change that so thank you for admitting it. If you read this thread you will see plenty of people saying that X is better/on par with X1 and PS4 that is not even close to being true and all launch games from both platforms destroys everything the Wii U has in it's arsenal. And IMO nothing the Wii U has shown is next gen or even late current gen which makes me think the system is not a big upgrade from PS360, being slightly more powerful than 7 year old consoles is something I'm not going to praise Nintendo for sorry, but you can if you want. NOW YOU CAN TAKE A GANDER AT MY SIG!!!

- YOU JUST GOT THAT WORK



Without order nothing can exist - without chaos nothing can evolve.

"I don't debate, I just give you that work"- Ji99saw

trixiemafia86 on 12 June 2013
dahuman said:
trixiemafia86 said:
dahuman said:
trixiemafia86 said:
dahuman said:
VGKing said:
 

Yes, I do. inFamous Second Son is one example. I suggest you take a look at the new gameplay trailer. There's a huge difference so stop lying to yourself

Then there's the 3rd party games such as The Division and Destiny and Titan. Those have next-gen elements that are more than just graphics.

Other than the higher res, the biggest improvement is actually lighting so far since the PS4 actually has the resources to pull it off now, this whole next gen thing has a lot of emphasis on lighting from what I can see so far which isn't saying much yet. I honestly think that we won't see anything mind blowing for awhile IMO, but I'm used to PC graphics though, we've had that kind of lighting for awhile if the game supports it on PC.

I'm used to PC graphics too but I think it looks really impressive. Maybe it's because its not an FPS I guess. Too many FPS "powerhouses" on PC

It's the lighting man, the lighting has really improved a lot because they have the resources to do it now, and that's a really good thing.

Yeah.

Off topic - Nice specs. Which games currently push your PC in 1080P

Planetside 2 maxed is unplayable at like 15 FPS or lower lol, I'm talking like super maxed inf file changing max lol, otherwise like 20s-30s with ingame max, but since I need to cap people, I do low everything and set rendering and texture to max ingame to get about 80FPS that way(for better IRV.) Rest of the games I generally don't have a problem with unless they were coded like shit. Guild Wars 2 can actually be taxing for a single card maxed out but crossfire is 60FPS with vsync. I haven't tried Metro Last Light yet, waiting on Steam sale. Tomb Raider used to perform pretty bad but after a few patches, FPS is good with that hair thing on. I'm waiting for 2014 to update my video card(s), got these when the 7xxx series weren't even out yet and it will show it's age soon when PC graphics hit the next level with these new consoles.

I've got an i5 3570k @4.5ghz and EVGA gtx 680 sc signature+ but I haven't tried planetside 2, metro or guild wars 2. I get almost 60 fps in tombraider with tressfx for hair on though. Most other games I max out at 60 fps. I want to know how to max out a game using the inf file. Iv got Remember me and it runs with dx9, would i be able to change that using the inf file?



Smartest nam evila

Current Platforms: HighendPC[rip]/PS4/PS3[rip]/Vita[rip]

dahuman on 13 June 2013
trixiemafia86 said:
dahuman said:
trixiemafia86 said:
dahuman said:
trixiemafia86 said:
dahuman said:
VGKing said:
 

 



Yeah.

Off topic - Nice specs. Which games currently push your PC in 1080P

Planetside 2 maxed is unplayable at like 15 FPS or lower lol, I'm talking like super maxed inf file changing max lol, otherwise like 20s-30s with ingame max, but since I need to cap people, I do low everything and set rendering and texture to max ingame to get about 80FPS that way(for better IRV.) Rest of the games I generally don't have a problem with unless they were coded like shit. Guild Wars 2 can actually be taxing for a single card maxed out but crossfire is 60FPS with vsync. I haven't tried Metro Last Light yet, waiting on Steam sale. Tomb Raider used to perform pretty bad but after a few patches, FPS is good with that hair thing on. I'm waiting for 2014 to update my video card(s), got these when the 7xxx series weren't even out yet and it will show it's age soon when PC graphics hit the next level with these new consoles.

I've got an i5 3570k @4.5ghz and EVGA gtx 680 sc signature+ but I haven't tried planetside 2, metro or guild wars 2. I get almost 60 fps in tombraider with tressfx for hair on though. Most other games I max out at 60 fps. I want to know how to max out a game using the inf file. Iv got Remember me and it runs with dx9, would i be able to change that using the inf file?

I haven't screwed with the files with Remember Me yet, it runs on UE though so I'm sure you can mess with the settings a lot. Planetside 2 you can find max setting with google and just copy paste and see your FPS die after you start it lol, shit looks really good, just not ideal for playing online competitive shooter in that scale lol, and since its F2P, you can just download it any time on Steam too.



trixiemafia86 on 13 June 2013

@dahuman Thx for the info. 



Smartest nam evila

Current Platforms: HighendPC[rip]/PS4/PS3[rip]/Vita[rip]

curl-6 on 13 June 2013
superspeedybull said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:

We all know the Wii U o n paper is weaker than the PS3 and 360

Except that it isn't.


On paper the Wii U processor is much weaker, The GPU has less cores and lower TFLOPS, the only thing the Wii U has over the 360 is 2GB of Ram and it runs 60fps nativley. 

Actually, Wii U's GPU is several generations ahead of the PS3 and 360's.

The Wii U GPU has more bandwith but less shaders at a lower frequency.

http://hdwarriors.com/wii-u-specs-fit-perfectly-together-gpu-several-generations-ahead-of-current-gen/

“The Wii U GPU is several generations ahead of the current gen. It allows many things that were not possible on consoles before."