By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Anti-used gaming policy is good for gamers.

1. Not really, the forums might be filled with people who spend large sums on their hardware but general PC gamers don't. The Top 10 GPUs in the last Steam survey featured 4 relatively under-powered Intel GPUs, with the remaining 6 being mid-range GPUs from 2-3 generations ago (which you'd probably get when purchasing a new desktop 2+ yrs ago). Many game on PC simply because they have one and are willing to put up with lower settings; the best selling PC games tend to be the ones that have the lowest required specs/are the most scalable.

2. But again, you need to spend money on a rival product. The point is that there are multiple free services that make DRM policies more palatable. If you don't like the ToS of one company, it's fairly simple to use another. With consoles, you have a $300+ barrier that prevents you from simply changing once you've jumped in.

3. Of course it's not intended but my point is it's very easy to do this on the PC, to the point where people will do it regardless of the legality of the situation. People won't complain if they can use loopholes.

5. Second-hand sales have never been a big element of PC games and the sharing of games has gradually reduced since the late 90s (well, legitimate sharing). On consoles, second-hand sales and game sharing have been a big part of the consumer ecosystem for the last 20+ years that MS are suddenly saying will completely change on XBone. It's a forced consumer change rather than a natural one.

What I'm basically saying is that this system is taking the worst of PC gaming whilst giving virtually none of the benefits. What's worse is it takes away from some of the foundations, culture and ecosystem that console gaming has been built upon.

Okay. I guess your points do make the comparison between Steam and the Xbone a little unfair. However, except for the last point, they are irrevelevant because MS has the right to do what they want with their own product. 

I do agree with your last point, but I also think that it's bound to happen, and it needs to happen. If anything, maybe MS should have waited until everything went all digital.





Around the Network
kowenicki said:
DigitalDevilSummoner said:
kowenicki said:

you do know you are on a VGChartz forum?

and you do realise you're not on a stock market forum

I think you missed my point totally.

BUT, this site was conceived around industry matters, sales and the business of the games industry... so, ya know.

and we see the industry as consumers and not stock holders... so, ya know

 

This quote tree has been shortened.

yo_john117



Time will tell, OP.Time will tell whether or not general consumers accept those policies for console gaming, and if they do, what will publishers go after next if studios keep closing left and right?



Ok so here's something to think about.

Firstly, I'm stationed in overseas right now. Live's functionality is severely limited over here, to the point that we can't purchase anything, and pretty much have to beg for a solid connection. With these new features I can garuntee you we will not be able to play are games 95 percent of the time. For military people who often get deployed or overseas.....this sucks royally. We will not be able to play.

Secondly an issue that i feel is big which people are not taking into account. I personally LOVE buying old games that i missed out from a generation or two ago and plopping them in. What in the hell happens when i buy a game that is rare and not at game stop? especially when the xbone stops providing service. I'm royally fucked. I still buy old ps2 games and play them. Now because a game that is no longer in print or getting recorded sales is done with, I have to bend over and take a shaft up the shooter and pretty much say, " Well it looks like im not playing (insert game title here) because it wasn't originally purchased by me and i can't activate it."


Everything on that list is the biggest joke I've heard. I keep expecting to wake up, or someone with a party hat and a unicycle to come out laughing and say, "Just kidding guys!"

But no that's not going to happen.....what did happen is a collective group of people trying to scalp and salvage whatever drop of money they can out of it's consumer got drunk one night and went to far.

I feel like the Microsoft is an adventure from an oldschool RPG. He came in my house opened all my chests, smashed all my pots and went through all my drawers taking whatever few gold coins he could laying about and walking out like there was no issue at all.



CURRENTLY PLAYING:  Warframe, Witcher 2

Just.....no.

It's not even the developers who get this extra money, its the publishers. There's a difference.



Around the Network
20happyballs said:

As a consumer, who enjoys the gaming industry, I am willing to accept certain changes that need to be made in order that the industry survives. But yes, that is just my opinion when looking at the facts. If someone can find a better alternative, than I'd be happy to endorse it.

 And all this talk about rights... I don't know your particular case, but I don't think that people are mad that they won't be able to resale their games. It's not like we can get much back from it anyways. People are made because they cannot purchase a game used. 

Far better alternative than stripping away consumer rights.  http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=161722&page=1#

I collect so as long as I enjoy the game I won't be selling it.  However, when I go back to play these games in 20 years when the network is shut down, I'll have no acess to these games.  I have around 80-90 PS3 games, but I'm certain there's one or two games I'll like that I didn't purchase.  What happens if this was the case for the Xbox One, the game was no longer in print, was not on the Xbox One digital store, and couldn't be purchased new?  So even while Xbox One servers are still running I'd be locked out of playing a game I just happened to overlook.

*edit*

Also.  Here's another reason that the policy is not good for gamers as it would hurt small publishers and probably less niche games would get localized. 

With no way to trade or sell used games to friends or sell them at decent prices like on Ebay or as an Amazon seller, people are going to be more skeptical about purchasing a game that they may or may not like.  Niche games.  A lot of the sales come from people not caring about throwing $60 on a game because they know they'll probably be able to get close to that amount by reselling on Ebay if they don't like it.  What happens to those same niche publishers now?  People just don't take the chance and buy the game.  The Japanese developers are giving countless excuses on why they don't release games in the west, and something like this could be t he final nail in the coffin for them to stop localizing games altogether.



Mr Khan said:
20happyballs said:
Stefan.De.Machtige said:
 


Bold: Let me be clear...

*Serious face*

If the hope (or survival) of the gaming industry depends on stripping its customers of rights and services, then my friend, it deserves to die!

*Even more serious face*

(IMO)


They have never been rights. They have been privileges. Digital game purchases are not resellable and nobody complains. You know why? Its because reselling a game you've bought and played is not actually a right. And IMO, I'd rather accept the used game policy than let the gaming industry die. That's just selfish.

If it has truly come down to that dichotomy (which is a point you should back up before just throwing it around like this), then it's the industry's fault for letting it get that bad.

It is their prerogative to *try* and force all of this anti-consumer crap down our throats, just as it's our prerogative to migrate to a more consumer-friendly hobby, whatever that may be.

I have no disagreements with what you just said. I just hope that your opinion does not become widespread. However, I don't think that people are fighting for their right to sale their games, they just want to be able to buy used games. 





soulsamurai said:

Ok so here's something to think about.

Firstly, I'm stationed in overseas right now. Live's functionality is severely limited over here, to the point that we can't purchase anything, and pretty much have to beg for a solid connection. With these new features I can garuntee you we will not be able to play are games 95 percent of the time. For military people who often get deployed or overseas.....this sucks royally. We will not be able to play.

Secondly an issue that i feel is big which people are not taking into account. I personally LOVE buying old games that i missed out from a generation or two ago and plopping them in. What in the hell happens when i buy a game that is rare and not at game stop? especially when the xbone stops providing service. I'm royally fucked. I still buy old ps2 games and play them. Now because a game that is no longer in print or getting recorded sales is done with, I have to bend over and take a shaft up the shooter and pretty much say, " Well it looks like im not playing (insert game title here) because it wasn't originally purchased by me and i can't activate it."


Everything on that list is the biggest joke I've heard. I keep expecting to wake up, or someone with a party hat and a unicycle to come out laughing and say, "Just kidding guys!"

But no that's not going to happen.....what did happen is a collective group of people trying to scalp and salvage whatever drop of money they can out of it's consumer got drunk one night and went to far.

I feel like the Microsoft is an adventure from an oldschool RPG. He came in my house opened all my chests, smashed all my pots and went through all my drawers taking whatever few gold coins he could laying about and walking out like there was no issue at all.

I definitely feel your pain. If only they could implement DRM in another way that didn't require an internet connection... I regards to your other argument about purchasing an old game, hopefully developers would be smart/kind enough to drop their prices after a certain time period. I also like to look at those used game racks with really cheap games. It is a shame that we will end up losing that.





Leadified said:
tuscaniman99 said:
I assume everyone who has a problem with the Xbox One only purchases CDs and DVDs/BluRays because digital forms of entertainment are anti-consumerist and you can't do whatever you want with it. I also assume none of you have smartphones because that is anti-consumerist as well since everything you download cannot be used by another party except yourself. I guess there are a lot more people walking around with Walkmans than I thought.


Except Microsoft is imposing these restrictions on physical media, which has always been free to share, rent and resell. That's why it's anti-consumerist.





theRepublic said:
The used market actually supports the new market. 

That's poor people talk. People who are under the delusion they can game on a budget are hilarious. How will EA's stock price go up if peasants don't buy the next COD at full retail price ? Peasants don't understand all digital is the way of the future, they expect me to carry around some archaic disc like I am some short of caveman ? And what if they don't actually like an all digital industry, they don't have any power, they are just the consumers. Such people should learn their place; personally I am disgusted whenever I am quoted by anyone with a connection lower than 10 mbps. And the second hand thing by itself is a ridiculous idea, first of all "second hand" ? you mean someone else touched it ? And secondly for the love of gold buddha if the friends you have want to...borrow, get better friends. The beauty of the ONE is that it feels like a closed community, you cannot go past the gate but it feels nice to have an all watchful eye over you. Restrictions means someone cares for you, it makes you feel important.