By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Are Sony fans worried about XB1's 15 exclusives?

y2jarmyofficial on 27 May 2013

oh so looks like there a insecure fanboy here=) what scared that this time around ms will bring it on,they had a tough fight this gen with only halo,gear,forza,and fable as there big hitters, what will happen when even one of those 8 new ips turn out to be a halo or gears like success , while halo and gears still to be around this new gen?yeah sony fans will worry, cuss unlike sony at least ms did not lost ground this gen xbox-24 million 360-77million ps2-over 150 million ps3-77 million



Around the Network
ironmanDX on 27 May 2013
y2jarmyofficial said:
oh so looks like there a insecure fanboy here=) what scared that this time around ms will bring it on,they had a tough fight this gen with only halo,gear,forza,and fable as there big hitters, what will happen when even one of those 8 new ips turn out to be a halo or gears like success , while halo and gears still to be around this new gen?yeah sony fans will worry, cuss unlike sony at least ms did not lost ground this gen xbox-24 million 360-77million ps2-over 150 million ps3-77 million


Chris Jericho is indeed awesome.



S.T.A.G.E. on 27 May 2013
ironmanDX said:
Yes. It will also be 17 games at launch. Quantum Break and Ryse are not internally developed like the 15 internally developed games.

The, "they'll all be kinect games" argument is pure downplay.


Um....you do know that Microsoft most likely owns those two IP's right?



ironmanDX on 27 May 2013
S.T.A.G.E. said:
ironmanDX said:
Yes. It will also be 17 games at launch. Quantum Break and Ryse are not internally developed like the 15 internally developed games.

The, "they'll all be kinect games" argument is pure downplay.


Um....you do know that Microsoft most likely owns those two IP's right?


I was aware that they are second party. They could count, they also could not.... We're better off waiting till E3 than discussing this here, though you're welcome to continue it on my wall.



S.T.A.G.E. on 27 May 2013
ironmanDX said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
ironmanDX said:
Yes. It will also be 17 games at launch. Quantum Break and Ryse are not internally developed like the 15 internally developed games.

The, "they'll all be kinect games" argument is pure downplay.


Um....you do know that Microsoft most likely owns those two IP's right?


I was aware that they are second party. They could count, they also could not.... We're better off waiting till E3 than discussing this here, though you're welcome to continue it on my wall.


Yes...just as second party as Lost Odyssey (which they own the IP to), but yes you're correct. E3 is coming up and I dunno..it would be refreshing to be shown something new by MS that involves games. Hearing about 16 new IPs...specifically from them from their track record is intriguing but I am skeptical because of their track record. Once I understand peoples minds set rarely do they ever stray from it.



Around the Network
Turkish on 27 May 2013
ironmanDX said:
Yes. It will also be 17 games at launch. Quantum Break and Ryse are not internally developed like the 15 internally developed games.

The, "they'll all be kinect games" argument is pure downplay.


What are you talking about, not 15 exclusives at launch, FIRST YEAR.

To be honest, WiiU will have more than 15.



Turkish on 27 May 2013
arcelonious said:

In regards to JRPGs, I would love to see Microsoft create first-party titles aimed at Japanese gaming audiences, rather than paying for third-party exclusivity. Having a title be first-party would mean that it would never come out on a competing console, and it could create more Japanese fans of Microsoft Studios.  I imagine that would be much more costly than paying for exclusivity, but maybe that is one of the ways Microsoft can do better in that region.  Suffice it to say that I will be very impressed if a couple of those 15 exclusives are first-party, Japanese market-oriented titles.


LOL. You make it sound so easy, as if Microsoft could just create a couple JRPGs (with their non existing Japanese studios) just to cater to Japanese people, that don't buy xbox consoles even after all the JRPG games it got early this gen from SquareEnix and Mistwalker.



ironmanDX on 27 May 2013
Turkish said:
ironmanDX said:
Yes. It will also be 17 games at launch. Quantum Break and Ryse are not internally developed like the 15 internally developed games.

The, "they'll all be kinect games" argument is pure downplay.


What are you talking about, not 15 exclusives at launch, FIRST YEAR.

To be honest, WiiU will have more than 15.


I meant first year. Just got my wires crossed with a discussion on another thread.



misterchoc90 on 27 May 2013
Wright said:
KungKras said:

It tells me that you are cheap enough to willingly enable all of these intrusions on people's rights, and console gaming going in this direction, just because of some games, or worse, brand loyalty.


Calm down and don't judge people.

This! Also, people shouldn't assume the direction Microsoft is taking is a bad one. What they're doing is risky, but it's a good idea to offer all that funtionality in a gaming console. I'm still looking forward to what's going to happen later in this generation. I'd say it might be a success or just fall flat.

On topic: As a Sony fan, I'm not worried, but rather interested in what exclusives they are. Hopefully not full Kinect games.



Wright on 27 May 2013
Turkish said:
arcelonious said:

In regards to JRPGs, I would love to see Microsoft create first-party titles aimed at Japanese gaming audiences, rather than paying for third-party exclusivity. Having a title be first-party would mean that it would never come out on a competing console, and it could create more Japanese fans of Microsoft Studios.  I imagine that would be much more costly than paying for exclusivity, but maybe that is one of the ways Microsoft can do better in that region.  Suffice it to say that I will be very impressed if a couple of those 15 exclusives are first-party, Japanese market-oriented titles.


LOL. You make it sound so easy, as if Microsoft could just create a couple JRPGs (with their non existing Japanese studios) just to cater to Japanese people, that don't buy xbox consoles even after all the JRPG games it got early this gen from SquareEnix and Mistwalker.


You are right. However, they should totally buy Mistwalker (They helped funding it, I don't see why not purchase it afterwards), so that they've got their Japanese side covered (along with Capcom, which enjoys multiplatforms).