By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Will the PS4 outsell the XBox One and WiiU?

MonstaMack said:
g911turbo said:
I think many of you (on both sides of the argument) are failing to realize that many people will buy MORE THAN ONE system.  

Sources? How many people on average buy more then one system each gen? Not counting say a Wii and 3DS, rather a Wii and one other system (360 or PS3).

I don't really have any sources other than my own experiences.  I would be interested if someone could provide sources to the contrary though.

Almost every household I knew that had a Wii also purchased an Xbox or PS3.  I know a few households with multiple Xboxes (and live, to play online simultaneously).  It just seems like Wii, and POSSIBLY the Wii U, carve out their own niche.  You buy the Wii U to play your Mario Karts, Marios, Zeldas, etc. and buy one of the other two to play ALL the 3rd party games, and some exclusives too.  Obviously, to be all encompasing, you need to have all 3.

Granted, some of that Wii crowd was STRICTLY a past non-gamer who was ONLY sucked in because of the draw of motion control.  They most likely will not return.  That being said, I think that number is heavily over estimated by some.  I think there will be many people returning for more mario, mario kart, etc. once the price becomes a little more compelling.  And lets face it, the Wii U DOES try something different yet again (tablet), which everyone simply writes off.

I truely believe that price means everything for all these manufacturers, Sony, M, and Nintendo.  Of course some games too, espesially system sellers like Mario Kart.  If Nintendo releases Mario Kart AND a price cut, and the system continues to struggle... well, then you can all start to panic and/or write off the Wii U.  

SIMPLE EXAMPLE.  The Wii U is now $5.  Do you go and buy one?  Also, the PS4 costs $999 on release.  Do you buy one?  Obviously extremes, but my point is $$$ matters.



Around the Network
Zero999 said:
Max King of the Wild said:

Your assumptions that anyone who says anything remotely negative about nintendo are just haters wanting them to fail just need to stop. It really makes you look silly and more than anything paints you with blind loyalty

your assumptions that everything even remotely related to nintendo is going to fail needs to stop. it really make you look silly and more than anything paints you with blind haterism.

Wow, what a silly post. Because I think the ps3 will sell more than 8mil this year apparently I think everything Nintendo will fail... Thank you. Thank you so much



Zero999 said:
AnthonyW86 said:

Yes they made some improvements, but they made just as many mistakes aswell. Nintendo is the only one sticking to the PowerPC architecture, wich will make porting more difficult. Also they used incredibly slow memory(the memory in the X360 is almost twice as fast), the PS4 will have a memory bandwidth of almost 15x as high. Also next gen will be all about sharing tasks between the gpu and cpu, Wii-U can't do that. If a game is released that is reliand on the GPU processing tasks like physics then the Wii-U can not run it.

keep dreaming, maybe you'll get curé syndrome.

Maybe you will grow up and act more mature and actually reply with decent agruments instead of acting like a stuborn kid who cries out for attention. I can only hope that you're lying about you age. Let's see if you make it to a month on these forums with that attitude.



Zero999 said:
goopy20 said:
Zero999 said:
goopy20 said:
Zero999 said:
Tachikoma said:
snowdog said:
Epic will bring tools and support for UE4 to the Wii U when publishers demand it, unless it's easier to port a title on UE4 for the PC lead SKU to UE3 for the Wii U SKU.

The Wii U should have an installed userbase around 8-10m+ before the end of the year, and like I've already mentioned publishers aren't going to leave that sort of money on the table now that there's a Nintendo console with a superior marketshare and a standard rendering pipeline. Unless of course they don't want to stay in business.


Really? tell me of these 3rd party publishers that have survived off of Nintendo game sales!, I'd love to know which of them aren't making 80%+ of their money off of the PS3 and 360.

P.s. once developers move to UE4 from UE3, the PS3 and 360 versions will stop appearing, and a direct result of that is the WiiU versions will stop too, leaving the WiiU with first and second party titles - If on the off chance someone DOES port UE4 (which i very much doubt for the reasons i've already outlined multiple times), it's not like theyre just going to give out their work to other third parties - earning money on a nintendo console as a third party is hard enough without giving away code you've spend hundreds of thousands to produce, to the competition.

ubisoft did. I don't think the amount of money 3rd party's make on ps360 are relevant to the case because we are talking about wii u having an install base that can't be ignored at a time like this. and no matter what you say, wii u can decently run anything developed with the future consoles in mind.

Ubisoft did because they catered towards the Wii adience with Just Dance. They never bothered making a Assasins Creed for the Wii though because they knew it wouldn't be worth it even if the Wii had the biggest install base. You have to agree that no game, that sold big on the ps3/ 360, made a dent in Wii sales when they did a watered down port. 

With the Wii-U, developers will probably have learned their lesson. There is a market for Dance, party, fitness and platform games for 3rd party developers but we can already see that the Nintendo audience don't care for core games. Even Metroid didn't sell more then 1,6m copies on the Wii with a 70m install base and COD Black Ops 2 sold like 100k copies on the Wii-U (while Nintendo Land sold almost 2m). Black Ops 2 wasn't a watered down port and still didn't sell, so how is this going to get better when the new consoles come out that will make Wii-U ports look like SNES games in comparison

bolded 1:you are comparing something that can't even be considered a port (the wii version of multiplats) with future wii u ports that only graphic whores will see relevant differences.

bolded2: so far blops 2 shold be around 200k. that's already enough to profit and considering the 3M install base, future games will sell more.

bolded3: wii u vs ps4/nextbox versions will probably need a close look to notice any graphical difference unless haters develop curé syndrome anytime soon, but I wouldn't count on that.

The problem with ur logic is that you believe Wii-U ports from ps4/ Next box games will not show a relevant difference like we see today with the Wii ports. I guess you have to see with your own eyes before you believe otherwise, but even if the ports do look almost identical, then there still isn't really a market for core games on a Nintendo console. The biggest franchise, Black Ops 2, being outsold 10:1 by Nintendo Land should give you a idea.

nothing is going to have a relevant difference, graphics got stagnant to the point we'll never see a big difference from previous generations.

the sales in relation to another game is irrelevant. the sales themselves are what matter and blops sold enough to profit from the port, ON A CONSOLE WITH 3M INSTALL BASE.

you're just one of many who don't like nintendo and want it to fail, just say it out loud instead of making excuses.

So now your saying graphics can't get any better then current gen and we will never see a big leap in graphics ever again? Dude why do you think MS and Sony are even releasing a new console? Also did you see the Killzone 4 demo? If that was a early build then I can't wait to see what next gen console games will look like 3 years from now. 



G911turbo brings up a VERY important point again that I raised in my original post in this thread. Both the PS4 and 720 are going to struggle to sell worse than the Wii U has done during the launch window due to much higher price points.

The latest rumour, which sounds credible, is that the 720 is going to have 2 SKUs - one priced at $299.99 with a 2 year subscription commitment to Live Gold for $15 per month so you're looking at $660 in total and the second SKU being $499.99 without the Live Gold commitment so you'll need to add the Live Gold subscription, which you should be able to pick up much cheaper.

Then you've got Sony continuing to ignore what made the PS2 so successful and what's made the PS3, PSP and Vita less successful. They've gone for an expensive and powerful box again - a console with 8GB of GDDR5 and a GPU pushing 1.8TFlops isn't going to be cheap before you even start to think about the controller and dual cameras in the camera bar. We'll probably be looking at $499.99 for the PS4 too.

And if that wasn't enough to cause them both problems given the current financial climate, both consoles are going to be supply constrained even if they do sell.

And then you've got the possibility of the rumours of always online and no used games for the 720 being true which I know, going by the reactions on various other forums I frequent, is going to be a dealbreaker for a fair few people.



Around the Network
goopy20 said:

So now your saying graphics can't get any better then current gen and we will never see a big leap in graphics ever again? Dude why do you think MS and Sony are even releasing a new console? Also did you see the Killzone 4 demo? If that was a early build then I can't wait to see what next gen console games will look like 3 years from now. 

yes, i've seen it. incredible graphics but no big leap from what we have right now because that's simply not possible.

also, go put words on the mouth of others. i didn't say graphics CAN'T get better, however they already reached a level of quality where diminishing returns starts to kick in. it will take lot's of extra processing power for a final result to look only marginaly better.



snowdog said:
G911turbo brings up a VERY important point again that I raised in my original post in this thread. Both the PS4 and 720 are going to struggle to sell worse than the Wii U has done during the launch window due to much higher price points.

The latest rumour, which sounds credible, is that the 720 is going to have 2 SKUs - one priced at $299.99 with a 2 year subscription commitment to Live Gold for $15 per month so you're looking at $660 in total and the second SKU being $499.99 without the Live Gold commitment so you'll need to add the Live Gold subscription, which you should be able to pick up much cheaper.

Then you've got Sony continuing to ignore what made the PS2 so successful and what's made the PS3, PSP and Vita less successful. They've gone for an expensive and powerful box again - a console with 8GB of GDDR5 and a GPU pushing 1.8TFlops isn't going to be cheap before you even start to think about the controller and dual cameras in the camera bar. We'll probably be looking at $499.99 for the PS4 too.

And if that wasn't enough to cause them both problems given the current financial climate, both consoles are going to be supply constrained even if they do sell.

And then you've got the possibility of the rumours of always online and no used games for the 720 being true which I know, going by the reactions on various other forums I frequent, is going to be a dealbreaker for a fair few people.

Lets just assume the engineers at Sony know what the hell they are doing when they chose to stuff 8 gigs of very expensive ram in there. Keep in mind the ps4 uses a new type of APU that takes the unified ram priciple to a whole new level.



Zero999 said:
goopy20 said:

So now your saying graphics can't get any better then current gen and we will never see a big leap in graphics ever again? Dude why do you think MS and Sony are even releasing a new console? Also did you see the Killzone 4 demo? If that was a early build then I can't wait to see what next gen console games will look like 3 years from now. 

yes, i've seen it. incredible graphics but no big leap from what we have right now because that's simply not possible.

also, go put words on the mouth of others. i didn't say graphics CAN'T get better, however they already reached a level of quality where diminishing returns starts to kick in. it will take lot's of extra processing power for a final result to look only marginaly better.

Name me one Wii-U, ps3 or Xbox game that even comes close? I never seen anything like that opening scene with the huge city vista to be honest, not even on pc and that is just a launch game. I think you will be shocked at E3 when they show the good stuff.



Hmm.....this topic seems silly to me at this point. Two of the three consoles aren't released, and one of them still isn't even formally announced yet. We have no idea how the new Xbox and PS4 will be received when they launch, and how they will sell.



Zero999 said:
goopy20 said:

So now your saying graphics can't get any better then current gen and we will never see a big leap in graphics ever again? Dude why do you think MS and Sony are even releasing a new console? Also did you see the Killzone 4 demo? If that was a early build then I can't wait to see what next gen console games will look like 3 years from now. 

yes, i've seen it. incredible graphics but no big leap from what we have right now because that's simply not possible.

also, go put words on the mouth of others. i didn't say graphics CAN'T get better, however they already reached a level of quality where diminishing returns starts to kick in. it will take lot's of extra processing power for a final result to look only marginaly better.

You do realize the first wave of games of ps3/360 looked slightly better than ps2 games... right? Gears of War was the first graphically impressive game on the system (even though it was still clunky and ugly) and that released a year after 360 launch. For the ps3 Uncharted was a year later too but still had some performance problems

You really dont know what youre talking about