Mr Khan said:
Viper1 said: Any economist that proclaims bubble growth over organic growth hates his children. |
Organic growth is actually very limited in nature (mostly to time-saving innovations and things that enable more people to live longer and live better). Most growth is bubble growth, whether backed by government spending or not.
|
Not usually it isn't... no.
If that were true GDP would be ~ equal to pick any time int he past really.
The fact that GDP even after bubble crashes stays where it is shows that most growth is real growth.
Also, I'd suggest government spending mostly doesn't cause bubbles either. Instead it causes cliffs. Like the "Fiscal" cliff. We spend, then when we don't anymore we "fall off" it.
It's not really effecting consumer demand so i don't think bubble is an accurate term.
Government POLICES can cause a bubble. Sometimes with spending involved (for example, giving homeowners a tax credit, or forcing banks to give loans to certain people). The spending though is irrelevent to the real distortions caused by the policy.
Spending itself however doesn't really create a bubble so much as cause inefficencies because it generally will spend a lot of money on stuff people don't want because one central guy can't really pick out what people want as much as everybody could for themselves.