Maybe. Consoles will have a custom chipset which will be optimized. That's the main part about consoles. The optimization that goes on makes a huge difference to the point where your eye cannot properly tell the difference between console and PC. If your PC monitor is 32inch and your TV is 46'', you will barely tell the difference if you're sitting at the same distance of 6 feet.

If they make it in 720P that will mean that apart from the resolution the game will look about the same. It makes sense to make the early multi-platform games 720P, and most people sitting from a couch distance won't notice much difference anyway.

you forgot the most important part for ps360, less players and smaller multiplayer maps which changes the whole game and isn't really battlefield anymore then...(little bit exaggerated)

Actually:

7970 = 1.7x 7850

7990 = 1.6-1.7x 7970

so 2.7-2.9x 7850 in total

I'd say 1080p/30fps with high settings (considering 7850 runs BF3 on ultra with 4xAA and HBAO in 1080p with 30+ fps)

Finally, something to my quad titan sli a bit of a challenge.

LOL, Next gen will look the same.

Only challenge you may have with titan quad sli is driver support and scalling challenge. :)

LOL, you clearly don't understand the hardware.

Put into perspective, this level of throughput exceeds that of even capable £120+ PC graphics cards, including current mid-range favourite the Radeon HD 7850.

Take from Digital Foundry about the KZ:SF demo. So, you're wrong.

Good thing Malta is more than 4 times more powerful than the 7850 then eh