Of course you do.... Hahahahaha

Interesting, because other people would say I was a PC fangirl because of my views on it and how the PS3 and 360 are holding back the industry, but hey, your agenda is pretty transparent if you want to assume i'm a sony fangirl to sleep better at night then by all means do so, doesn't change the fact that, being in the games industry myself, and having spent a lot of time working on all three devkits, i've a much more solid idea of each consoles endgame, and thus am in a much better position to predict the outcome.

"before the next xbox has even been revealed" doesn't really work as an argument when i spend most of my day at work sat in front of the very hardware you're all waiting to see released.

You have no idea if the PS3 is actually the "centerpiece" for any of that. And for that reason, MS succeeded. Last gen had you asked about the absolute leader in gaming and multimedia it would have been the PS2. Now that isn't the case. Again, mission accomplished.

No one pays for it. The app doesn't cost anything extra. And ESPN3 on the 360 is awesome even if you have a cable box hooked up to the same TV. The app is not the same as watching ESPN on TV. It's blatantly obvious you have no idea what the app is, what it does, or what you're talking about in general in regards to 360 apps. So no point in responding to you any further.

I've entrusted a select few people from these forums with more detailed information, they are free to chime in and correct your doubt at their own disgression, however for your own sake i would advise that you limit how much you "call bs" as you'll only end up looking silly in the end.

I'll take this opportunity to also state that I work part time as a multi platform reviewer, too - go ahead and call BS on that, unlike with my other job i'm not bound by NDA not to show you the error of your assumption.

here's some variable that popped into my head when reviewing lifetime sales of 360 and ps3.

1. the 360 has a lead of less than 2mil according to the chart on the homepage.

2. 360 had an entire year to sell systems without the ps3 rivalary

3. when someone's 360 broke, and they went ahead and bought a new one without trying to repair the first one, that counts as a new sale.

that last point there, as someone who works in the gaming industry, I do notice a lot of people doing that, instead of trying to fix it they just go ahead an buy a new one.

with those variables in mind, would you say that the ps3 is actually more successful than 360, or not?

explain why, I'm interested :)

If I don't believe you, I'm hardly likely to believe the others you've mugged off either.  Everyone's a critic, writing down your thoughts doesn't mean you're any better educated on the subject. 

For the record, I'd like to know how someone doubting what someone else has written on the internet is going to look "silly".  If I believed you outright then I'd be the idiot.  Anyway, this conversation is done, I'm saying your talking bullshit, everyone else is entitled to make their own mind up. 

While Sony goes bankrupt doing so.

Because Sony only makes consoles....oh wait *facepalm*

Well it's their whole business that's losing money so have a facepalm yourself.

Or you made a massive brain fart and spouted nonsense ^^  You can't say "PS3 IS DOING BAD CAUSE PHONES ARE SELLING BADLY!" They are not related in any possible way. It's a classical fallacious argument.