By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Don't compare WiiU and GameCube

I think people only compare them because of the lackluster sales. Will it pick up when Nintendo releases their big IP's? Maybe, but the appeal of the wii-u will also take a a further nosedive when the "real" next gen consoles hit the stores.



Around the Network
phenom08 said:
Mummelmann said:
What is this nonsense about "Nintendo knows this and that and have learned X and Y" always being thrown into every argument. They clearly haven't learned and have shown time and time again, the three past years being the closest for evidence, that they do not learn and aren't able to keep up at all times, they have reverted back to becoming followers instead of leaders in the market and shown very poor judgement in the development process, architecture, philosphy and launch of the Wii U and have very much set themselves up for their current predicament, it was long in the coming and all but obvious from the first time they showed the Wii U.

Their stress and rush, paired with the inability to see the importance of things such online features and gaming, ease of use in connectivity with other players, uniform formats, full support for 3rd party peripherals and something as given as advertising shows a company that is living in the past.
Going from the destructive force that was the peak of the DS/Wii combination and into this; Wii U barely moving and the 3DS combating against the approaching death of the dedicated handheld market (another thing that is/was painstakingly obvious to many without Nintendo goggles on) shows that they are far from infallible, they are not contemporary enough, out of touch with the technology applied in almost all gadgets, oblivious to cost efficency and getting hardware for their buck (SSD drive with no room and a super expensive tablet controller that is trumphed by all other tablets on the market?) and, most of all; damn stubborn and set in their ways.

Nintendo are too Japanese to succeed in the West in their current state, its as simple as that. They have made grave mistakes and shown poor judgement of the console market, they have underestimated their competition, riding too long on the ripples of the Wii's viral marketing and grown too fond of their own ways and exellence to see the need for renewal, keeping pace with the market as a whole and humility in any form.

OP: You need to wake up and smell the roses, which is the current state of the market and Nintendo at this stage. They are not in sync at all and the Wii U was a mistake from the first stroke of the designers pen and there is nothing that any amount of games, peripherals or pricing strategies can do about the core problem; the basic lack of appeal and the miscalculated and highly erroneous design and aim straight between two markets where neither is being reeled in and most likely never will be.

All your Nintendo related posts smack of a naive and surreal lack of insight in how things work as a whole, you sound like the dreaded Sony fan anno 2007, the nemesis of all Nintendo fans across the globe.


Its funny you are always commenting about Ninty and how the WiiU wont be successful but you never ever state which company will beat them. Why is that? Are you afraid of being wrong? So Mummelmann will PS4/720 sell better than WiiU this December if they have launched by then? Its their opening holiday, I dont see why not especially with the WiiU failing hard.

The PS4 and 720 won't have a stellar december at all, I think. What I think they'll have are sustained decent sales throughout the year due to a stronger core following, good 3rd party support, terrific online and connectivity (that I don't give a shit about, mind you, but a lot gamers do as server figures and streaming service numbers will show you) and an overall design philosophy that appeals more to the modern market. I'm not saying that they'll appeal to me much though, from what I've seen so far, the PS4 is focusing mainly on the things I don't care for in gaming and I see no reason to own one in the near future. What casual gamers do won't matter for the Wii U or or the others since they've moved away from home consoles and even handhelds and will remain where they are for now.

Will the Wii U be outsould by the PS4 and 720 in december (and november, depending on when they launch)? Yes, I think it will. News value alone would allow some decent sales for the newcomers, there appears to be a fairly good launch line-up ready and the pricing is bound to be less ridiculous than with the PS3 and 360. I could be wrong though, only time will tell for sure. Without the news value, I think it could be hard for the Wii U to sell as much during holidays 2013 as it did in 2012, unless there's a significant price cut and all the big guns arrive at once to elevate the weekly numbers through the entire season. If a 3D Mario, Mario Kart, Zelda and a price cut hit at once, it will be a daunting task for the PS4 and 720 to beat the Wii U, the trouble is that even if this scenario came true, the Wii U would still suffer slow sales (certainly slower than the competition) for almost the entirety of the new years and spring/summer of 2014 due to the console being designed the way it is, the Gamepad in particular.

The 8th gen will be shorter than the 7th gen and will move considerably less hardware and software, I think that both the PS4 and 720 will outsell the Wii U lifetime but not by a huge amount, overall I think that the market leader will end up with something along the lines of 36-37% marketshare and similar figures on software, 3rd party platform exclusives will basically disappear. Development cycles for hardware are going to go faster while sales will slow down for a multitude of reasons. I think the Wii U will end up selling somewhere around 40-45 million, if you must have a figure, part of the explanation lies in your quote from me in your sig (that I do hope you'll keep) and the main part lies in the simple fact that the Wii U is not a desireable product simply due to the nature of its design philosophy and backwards tech, teamed with poor 3rd party support, poor implementation of the features the Gamepad might offer (much like we saw with the Wii-mote, a truly unfulfilled potential if I ever saw it) and weaker connectivity, less features, less streamlined hardware and software solutions (storage, 3rd party peripherals, OS, e-shop, servers etc). The lack of faith and support from retailers is hurting it as well and will continue to do so, Nintendo's own shipment figures and fiscal results will speak volumes towards this.

Overall, I expect the 8th gen to suffer a historical first; recession in the home console market and the death of the dedicated handheld device.

I'm not afraid of being wrong, I''ve been wrong numerous times but always stayed on the site and always own up to it. Something tells me you don't have the mettle to do the same though, there have been plenty of users like you who simply vanished when things turned sour for them. For my part, the console wars are mostly out of interest for the numbers themselves, I don't feel invested at all in the three manufacturers or their offerings at this point since they all seem to be moving in a direction that would take them even further from what I want (Hollywood games, gimmicks, poor writing, mindless action, silly niche over-the top games, uninteresting online wankfests and childish renditions of once proud franchises and themes). I'll stick with my PC and likely be fine with just that for a long time.

The lack of appeal in the Wii U is not about hardware specs (like the OP seems to think I'm implying), its the sum of a silly controller, poor hardware solutions, lack of support for gadgets, peripherals and, of course, 3rd party titles likely being absent through most of its lifetime and the fact that it is aiming at two different markets without really providing any base designed incentive for either to purchase it. Games and pricing can and will boost weekly sales, but only short terms, the core design of the console and Gamepad will remain the same no matter what and this problem cannot be advertised away either.

Does this answer your questions?



TheLastStarFighter said:
Scisca said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
Scisca said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
BossPuma said:
TheLastStarFighter said:

Can people please stop comparing these systems.  In particular, I'm tired of the statement that Gamecube had lots of awesome games and didn't sell well, so how are games going to help WiiU.  The systems are nothing alike.

People say Mario Sunshine, Zelda: Windwaker, Smash Brothers, Luigi's Mansion, Pikmin, Metroid Prime and MarioKart DD couldn't sell Gamecube and they were amazing games.  I'm sorry, but they aren't.  Well, they may be great games, but I wouldn't know, because I didn't play them and didn't want to. I bought a PS2 instead.  And an XBox.  Mario Sunshine was a dorky name for a game with Mario using a watergun on vacation.  Zelda was a cartoon.  Metroid Prime may be amazing, but to me it looked weak and boring compared to Halo.

 

Dont criticise games you've never played. All the games you mentioned are phenominal. They dont deserve to be judged by how they look.

You - and a few other Nintendo fans on this thread - have completely missed my point.  Whether they deserve it or not, that is how titles are judged.  I'm not saying that they are bad games.  In fact, I can't wait to try Wind Waker on WiiU.  I'm saying that their themes sucked so people wouldn't buy them.  They didn't have mass appeal because they were quirky offshoots.  In particular, when GC came out I was in college and few people would be caught dead with a purple box and sunshine and cartoon games in their flat, not when your neighbours have the cool PS2 and GTA or are having beers and shooting people in Halo.  Nintendo's big titles weren't factors in the GC era because the system was a toy and they had funny themes... and as such wouldn't sell to the key 16-25 demo.  I'm older now, and as such I have no problem playing toon Link.  But I still probably wouldn't buy a system that looked like the gamecube.  It just looks too immature.

So basicaly you are saying that GCN failed, because it wasn't cool - and I agree. But now try to explain to me how is the key 16-25 demo miraculously going to consider a previous gen level Wii U "cool"? You really think black and white colour of the chasis is cool enough to win with PS4/X720? It's not. Wii U is not even cooler than PS360. Wii didn't sell because it was cool, but because it was different and offered original experiences. Wii U has lost that and what is left is a heavily underpowered yet ridiculously expensive console with a Vita instead of a controller. Not a good combo.

Wii U is a GCN 2, it's making the same mistake. It's just not cool. It will have good games, but like in the case of GCN, people just won't feel like buying it. The reasons for it not being cool are different, but the result is the same.

Only time will tell if Wii U is cool.  But it is very different from Gamecube. Also,

-No one cares about the power.  Most people don't understand power. Power appeals to about 10% of the market. PS1&2 and Wiiwere significantly underpowered.

-From my experience Wii U is cool. Girls have loved playing with the touch screen, guys like the interface and that it plays COD.  However, most people don't know what it is.

I hope you are joking. Power appeals to the core market, X360 didn't pick up until Gears of War got released. People saw it and believed. PSX and PS2 were not significantly underpowered, they were just a little bit less powerful than consoles released later, but still were considered monsters upon their release and could easily run comparable ports of all games. And they were cool and introduced CDs and DVDs to the mass market. Wii was a revolution. Wii U is nothing of the above, neither was the GameCube.

Seriously, since when is gaming stuff that girls play cool? What guys like or even just care that Wii U plays CoD? Are you aware that CoD BlOps 2 sold 22 mil on PS360 and just 170k on Wii U? Stop with this bs, cause it makes you look more desperate to defend Wii U than is really necessary.

The console is a bad design. It is struggling and there is no chance for it to become a huge success, but it should be profitable for Nintendo in the end, just like GCN was. The 75 million sales you talk about in OP is crazy, it won't even get close. It's a GCN 2 and it will sell only moderately better than GCN, benefiting a bit from the success of Wii. 40-45 mil will be a huge success and that's what I hope it manages to achieve, though 35 mil is also possible. Nintendo has to be ready to enter starvation phase and be prepared to make Wii U profitable with just such low sales, like they did with the GameCube.

Two things are clear from this post. a) you have no interest in females.  I do, so their opinion is valuable.  b) You don't read very well, as I never said 75 million anywhere.

a) on the contrary, I'm crazy about them, but, as it seems - unlike you, I'm not a nerd. I don't play video games with them, I do other stuff they like more (no, I don't mean only having sex). Still, I can't see this being any argument in the conversation about which gaming console is cool. Just a tip - girls won't find you attractive or cool basing on which console you have or what games you play. PS2 was the coolest console ever and I can't remember it being big with girls. Hence, the argument about them allegedly having fun with Wii U is pretty much meaningless, cause it won't make a console cool.

b) ok, I made a mistake, some other N fanboy made such a prediction in different thread today, my bad.



Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!

My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/

My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.

"Mario Sunshine was a dorky name for a game with Mario using a watergun on vacation. Zelda was a cartoon. Metroid Prime may be amazing, but to me it looked weak and boring compared to Halo."

"Also, the Gamecube was a purple lunchbox with a legoland controller."


I wish I could permanently flag you in some list of "Shallow non-gamers whose opinion I will never, ever care about and I would love to block forever."



Currently playing:

Bloodbath Paddy Wagon Ultra 9

VGKing said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
VGKing said:
TheLastStarFighter said:

Can people please stop comparing these systems.  In particular, I'm tired of the statement that Gamecube had lots of awesome games and didn't sell well, so how are games going to help WiiU.  The systems are nothing alike.

People say Mario Sunshine, Zelda: Windwaker, Smash Brothers, Luigi's Mansion, Pikmin, Metroid Prime and MarioKart DD couldn't sell Gamecube and they were amazing games.  I'm sorry, but they aren't.  Well, they may be great games, but I wouldn't know, because I didn't play them and didn't want to. I bought a PS2 instead.  And an XBox.  Mario Sunshine was a dorky name for a game with Mario using a watergun on vacation.  Zelda was a cartoon.  Metroid Prime may be amazing, but to me it looked weak and boring compared to Halo.

Now, when I saw Super Mario Galaxy, Zelda: TP and Wii Sports, I was sold on a Wii in an instant.  The realistic, epic-looking Zelda and the mind-blowing Mario Galaxy were spectacular.  Throw in New Super Mario Bros Wii for good measure and you have some serious 1st party titles that appeal to me and a lot of other people.

When it comes to Wii U, we haven't seen the major titles yet.  I would have every reason to believe that Nintendo has learned what sells and what does not, and Wii U will be receiving Wii-like titles that are system sellers.  The Mario will follow that path of Galaxy and be impressive visually and have an appealing theme.  Mario won't likely be going on vacation again, ever, especially with WiiU sales struggling.  Zelda will likely be a back-to-basics graphical showcase that sucks in core gamers.  No waterguns.  No toons.  As such, the games will likely appeal to a broad audience - the Wii audience - and move systems.

Also, the Gamecube was a purple lunchbox with a legoland controller.  I know some of you may have loved it, but most adults and many teens wouldn't touch it, rightly or wrongly.  No amount of good games could sell it.  Wii U is sleek, black (or white) and contemporary looking.  Give it games and people will be happy to have it in their living room.

You just contradicted yourself. You say New Super Mario Bros appeals to you and a lot of people yet you gon on to say that Wii U hasn't seen any major titles yet when it had New Super Mario Bros U on DAY 1. This leads me to believe that this WILL BE THE NEXT GAMECUBE. A mass appeal game has failed to sustain hardware sales over a long period of time. Will a Mario Kart of Smash Bros make any difference? They sure didn't for the Gamecube.

No, I didn't contradict myself, you misread what I wrote.  I said I bought the Wii because of WIi Sports, Zelda: TP and Mario Galaxy.  NSMBWii was gravy. I said all of those titles together made for a great lineup, not just one of them.

Wii launched with two innovative and impressive titles in Zelda and WiiSports.  Mario Galaxy was already announced to be coming and launched in time for the huge 2007 Christmas season.

NSMB is a great title, but on WIi it released in timing with the 2009 price drop to $199, when Wii really went mass-market. It was a poor Wii U launch title because it offered little in the way of inovation or impressive graphics.

Now, if Mario U and MarioKart U hit this Christmas and are impressive titles, and Zelda is shown and is impressive, those titles will move systems, and NSMBU will be another nice one to have in the library.  NSMBU is not enough alone, especially since it is too similar to NSMBWii and NSMB2.



When has a Wii game ever relied on graphics or innovation to sell? Look at SSBB that game is just the sequel to Melee but with differenc characters and some supers. Hardly any innovation yet it sold millions.

Do you think Mario Kart U will offer a gigantic leap over Mario Kart Wii to make people buy the $300 Wii U?
Zelda isn't anywhere near being done either so do you think the remake of the Gamecube Zelda will push systems? I don't.

Just like NSMBU is too similar to NSMBWII, so will every other Nintendo title released this year and the next will be. What Nintendo is new IP. It needs the next Wii Sports or the next Zelda or Mario. Pikmin isn't it. Wii Fit U won't have the same effect as on the original.

It's an uphill battle for Nintendo and I don't see a light at the end of the tunnel. Instead of enjoying the first year on the market without competition they are struggling to communicate to people that the Wii U isn't just an add-on for the Wii.

Super Mario Galaxy and Zelda TP were both visually stunning at the time. In the early days of Wii, HD TV's were rare, and the visual were impressive. People forget that.

But we're also not talking about Wii here.  It's Wii U.  The system need games that maker gamers say this is much better than Wii, and give them a reason to buy it.  A major difference between Wii and Wii U is HD visuals. There haven't been exclusives that do that well enough yet.



Around the Network

Lol, I don't know who hates me more for this thread. Sony fans who want to say Wii U is the next Gamecube or Nintendo fans who want to say there was nothing wrong with Gamecube. LMAO!



TheLastStarFighter said:
bananaking21 said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
kitler53 said:
wiiU and gamecube share the most important characteristic to wiiU's future: the shape of the sales curve.


"I would have every reason to believe that Nintendo has learned what sells and what does not, and Wii U will be receiving Wii-like titles that are system sellers."

if that were so wii wouldn't be sitting at ~1/5 of the currently weekly sales of ps3 or 360. if that were so wiiU wouldn't be sitting at less than vita's weekly sales (aligned for launch).

The sales are currently weak, that's for sure.  But the point is, the games that Nintendo released for Gamecube were not system sellers.  The games they released for Wii were systemd sellers. I would expect the games for Wii U to be more like their Wii counterparts when they come.  And other than sluggish sales, there is almost nothing similar between Wii U and Gamecube, in look, design, function or games.  Their plights are very different.


actually there is, its the target audince that nintendo wants, the market they want to sell to, which is the core audince. the adult males who been playing video games for decades. and there comes a problem with one of your points. mario galaxy1 and 2, Wii sports and the games you listed were system sellers, but to who? the "casual" crowd, the new market the Wii sold to, not the market of gamers who bought the xbox and ps2. the question is, are those games going to be system sellers to the adult gamers or "core" gamers? 


I would say Wii U is targeted at a broad audience, the Wii crowd and the PS360 crowd.  The tablet is an attempt to capitalize on the mainstream popularity of tablets and phones.  WiiU is also a web browser and media player.  Gamecube...I'm not sure of it's target market but it was strictly core gamers, and by it's design I would have to guess strictly children, though I don't know that was their intention.

Wii Sports was a mainstream and new customer focused title, but I wouldn't say that about Galaxy at all.  It is a core title.  That and Zelda:TP are the main reasons I bought a Wii.  A lot of core gamers bought Wii's.  If MarioU and ZeldaU look as impressive as Galaxy and TP looked in their day, a lot of core customers will pick up a WiiU.  If MarioU is Sunshine2 and ZeldaU is a cartoon, many will skip those titles, and the system altogether. 

the WiiU is targeted at a broad audience i agree. but i was simply stating another factor it had in commen with the gamecube. 

now dont get me wrong on what im about to say in these paragraphs. there are a lot of arguments about this subject but it would be insanse to not consider nintendo fans core gamers. they have the same buying habits as other core gamers on other systems but the only different thing is their taste in games from the ps360 crowd. a lot of people claim that nintendo fans are not core gamers, i dont agree with that at all, but lets look at the "core" audience shall we? lets be honest here, its males, teens and adults (mostly adults). and what are nintendo trying to sell their consoles to these audience with? mario, zelda, metroid, mario kart, 2D mario, super smash bro's. these are the games they are using as system sellers to the core audience. well guess what, they are not. lets be honest here, these games simply dont sell to all adults, now i realize it does sell to some adults. there are some adults who love mario and these nintendo games. a good number as well, millions infact. but the core market is much more than just millions, they are tens of millions and breaking over the 100th million.

here is the problem, nintendo is so fixated that mario is a system seller to core audience. but its not, mario is made and developed to cater to kids. yes, i said it. and its true, does that mean that some adults wont like it? no. does that mean its wrong for adults to like it? certainly not. but dont expect it to be loved by all adults. and certainly dont expect adults to spend 300+ dollars just to play it. heck, i love spongbob square pants, i do. there is really nothing wrong with it, but certainly not every adult likes spongbob right? and certainly not every adult would spend money on anything spongbob related

nintendo is determind and fixated that mario sells to the core, it doesnt! it simply doesnt! look at the gamecube! a nintendo console for the core audince, it got crushed. but lets look before it, the n64, with what is said by most nintendo fans to have the best mario, zelda and star fox games of all time. it had the games that nintendo wanted to use to sell to the adults, and look at how that ended, it got crushed. ok ok, lets look at the Wii! nintendo's bighest success in the home console market. a complete and utter failer when it comes to the core. it just didnt sell to them, why?  because they tried to sell it to them using mario and zelda

i have more to say, but this rant went on for to long lol



TheLastStarFighter said:
Lol, I don't know who hates me more for this thread. Sony fans who want to say Wii U is the next Gamecube or Nintendo fans who want to say there was nothing wrong with Gamecube. LMAO!

Hasn't it occured to you yet that you are simply wrong and no personal bias of other users can affect that? I think it speaks volumes.



Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!

My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/

My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.

Gamecube's library tends to be highly overrated by the Nintendo fans, I find.
Wind Waker and Sunshine were weak for their respective franchises, and along with Starfox Adventures, Double Dash, and Jungle Beat, they made weird design choices that repelled fans.
And yet its first party hits still took it from Dreamcast status to surviving the generation and turning a profit.



Scisca said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
Lol, I don't know who hates me more for this thread. Sony fans who want to say Wii U is the next Gamecube or Nintendo fans who want to say there was nothing wrong with Gamecube. LMAO!

Hasn't it occured to you yet that you are simply wrong and no personal bias of other users can affect that? I think it speaks volumes.


Absolutely not.  Not a single person has made a letitimate argument to say that Wii U is anything like Gamecube.  Nintendo fans have said gamecube is great and it's games were great and I"m mean and shallow.  Sony fans have said Wii U sucks and it's not going to sell and it's a flawed system.  But no one has shown that Wii U's philosophy or it's exclusive games are like Gamecube's games.  The systems, the launch situation, the strategy, everything about the systems are polar oposites.  The results may or may not be the same, but the systems are completely different from each other, and no one has shown otherwise.  They have just bashed Wii U and it's chances or bashed my shallow view on gamecube.

Some of the posts on this thread from both sides are quite rational and spark good discussion.  Others, like your's, are just blinded by fandom and add no value at all.