They make other cars that replaced the old one. People should buy that model.

Anyways, as I said in another reply: gamers pay way more money for games than 10 years back. Game devs could survive back then, if they can't today not the consumer is to blame.

to be sold used it had to be bought new once. There won't be more used copies of a game getting resold than there were copies of the game sold originally. So publishers and developers got there money for it. There are many things that developers and publishers can do to reduce this most involve making consumers want to keep the game. Not forcing them to. However if the idea of used sales really made a publisher or developer nervous they could already go digital only.

Stopping people from selling things that they physically own is completely ridiculous for consumers.

Not the same at all, car companies sell their cars to dealerships and are in total control of what price the dealership pays, the dealership, the middle man, then chooses how much of a mark up to charge and that usually the final price the customer see and is charged. In this industry the price is control by the middle man, ie microsoft, sony and nintendo, MSN,  it is usually 59.99 or 49.99 us, therefore the price that the publisher can charge to MSN is no longer completely under their control, if the publisher wants to sell their game on a console they must agree to MSN terms and conditions. Basically used sale hurts publishers ALOT more then it hurts car companies. 

I don't know if I've ever bought a used game or sold a game I own. Scratch that, I did buy Twighlight Princess off a friend. But I am emphatically against banning used games in principal. If I buy something, I want to be able to do with it what I want. Whether that's play it, hoard it in a closet somewhere or give it to my nephew. Or sell it.

Games are expensive and renting is becoming harder to do. The only people to fault for developers going out of buisness are the developers themselves, and to a lesser extent Sony and MS for pushing HD gaming ( a little) before its time. Inflating budgets have made development riskier, but there are other options, such as smartphone development, the Wii or 3DS. Game companies that are smart spend less on production and make innovative games that sell lots of copies. Those companies make millions or billions in profit. No, I don't think the games industry needs charity and I think banning used games is a terrible move. It could shut down stores like Gamestop who promote these products to mall shoppers.

Actually, I'm pretty sure we pay some of the cheapest prices for games of any era.

Also, people, please stop with the awful analogies.  Industries like auto and video use an entirely different model.  I don't care which side of the debate you're on, these are meaningless comparisons.

I have been thinking about this for a while, mostly the past two gens, and I don't believe it would have been feasible until next gen. Here is my thoughts on the matter:

There are some companies that release games in very limited quantities, I have gotten a few used games only because they are no longer in production after a week or two of being released. Had used games been block this would cause a serious issue along with even bigger price spikes for rare games, leaving a vast majority of people to never play the games.

However, with the next-gen having all games on digital makes that a smaller issue. There are still people that prefer their games in physical format, so they will pay the price set when a low supply game is made, but it will still be available for purchase from the digital store.

With all that, I would vote for used game blocking next-gen. I don't think it will happen, but if it does I'll be ok with it.

Heres an idea that could work, what if the console makers agreed to block used games if publishers agreed to a smaller percentage of a games sale, basically the console makers could lower the price of new game to 49.99, selling more copies, and by blocking used games, the publishers would see more revenue because the additional sales, yes they would make less a each copy but they would make more money by selling additional units. If gaming addiction is real, people who mostly bought used would still buy games, what do you guys think

agreed bad comparison

That sounds like a pretty decent idea. I just think it is time to rid used game sales.  Obviously there is other things that needs to be fixed but either every game needs an online pass fee or used games need to disapear.  Or at least games that hasnt been out long.