| happydolphin said: Wow man... think a little. |
Do you mind expanding on what you just said? I don't understand if you're trying to tell me that I'm stupid for not thinking of FFXI or what.
| happydolphin said: Wow man... think a little. |
Do you mind expanding on what you just said? I don't understand if you're trying to tell me that I'm stupid for not thinking of FFXI or what.
leatherhat said:
|
No it wasnt. It was a huge step back for the series. It went from mainstream franchise to a niche for nolife freaks that like to spent 500 hours on grinding and pay for that every month.
~Mod Edit~
This post has been moderated.
-Smeags
Fantastic News. Hope it keeps on like this until they start making games people actually want again.
Atto Suggests...:
Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series
Game - Metro Last Light
TV - Deadwood
Music - Forest Swords
NintendoPie said:
Do you mind expanding on what you just said? I don't understand if you're trying to tell me that I'm stupid for not thinking of FFXI or what. |
I'm talking about this reply:
NintendoPie said:
? I'm talking about Final Fantasy XIV. |
You initially said that nobody wants a SE mmo, he brought up FFXI, and you say you were talking about FFXIV, but it doesn't matter since it already proves your first post wrong...
It's not about what you're talking about specifically (FFXIV), but about what your point is (nobody wants SE MMOs).
Piernik said:
|
You realize mmo's have subsciption fee's right? Those no life freaks (All 2 million plus of them) made ff11 the most profitable final fantasy game of all time.
Time for hype
happydolphin said:
You mean like inviting friends to a game, or player to player messaging and such? As far as I know this could all be implemented in the game, much like FFXI had it, much like WoW has it. Wii also supports the keyboard. |
But none of those games are on Wii....
While it's tough to do straight comparisons, I don't think anyone would try and argue that you should pick Wii and friend codes for your online platform over Live and PSN.
| outlawauron said:
But none of those games are on Wii....
|
For example, in Monster Hunter Tri, I don't remember having to exchange friend codes. I doubt it's different in DQ.
Iirc, in Tri, you could look up a user by username and play with him/them.
they shouldn't have made it online based as now they will blame Nintendo for them not selling well on their systems
| R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
![]() |
|
|
happydolphin said:
I'm talking about this reply:
You initially said that nobody wants a SE mmo, he brought up FFXI, and you say you were talking about FFXIV, but it doesn't matter since it already proves your first post wrong... It's not about what you're talking about specifically (FFXIV), but about what your point is (nobody wants SE MMOs). |
My statement still stands as FF MMO's do obviously worse than most (if not all) FF RPG's.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5113586 That should help you understand a little more of that I was going for.
But did you seriously think I meant no one wanted their MMO's? If so, then you probably should've thought a little more about that. I was exaggerating!
| spurgeonryan said: Dragon Quest X, an expensive online RPG with Square Enix at the helm, has not met the company’s expectations, and is a big reason for the studio’s recent financial issues. MSN Japan has reported that this major publisher/developer is in the red for the first time since the merger of Square and Enix, falling well below expectations for the period of April to December 2012. Certain segments, like mobile games, are finding a moderate degree of success, but the significant investment that is Dragon Quest X has yet to attract a true following. “The slump is reportedly down to the company’s new online RPG venture, Dragon Quest X,” MSN states. “While the disappointing financial turn for the company can be partially attributed to the burden of running the new online service, it is also down to game sales not meeting expectations. The Wii (and soon to be Wii U) game is however, making ‘steady progress’ according to Square Enix.” Some MMOs are a bit of a slow burn, so there’s still time for Square to grow the game into something worth bragging about. However, only so much money can be sunk into Dragon Quest X before it’s labeled a failure. Square isn’t what it once was, but do you still think it can produce profitable, memorable experiences? http://stickskills.com/2013/02/10/dragon-quest-x-sales-below-expectations/ |
What, what, what? So, is it a big reason, or just partially a reason?
The article do recognices the actual statement from S-E "The operation of “DRAGON QUEST X,” a major MMORPG, started in August, 2012, has been showing steady progress" Here.
It even states that they have not turned profit "primarily due to the increasingly difficult condition of the world-wide console game market, under which the Group is struggling to achieve a fair expected return on its investment."the only games that recieve high praise are social games.
The whole "not reaching expectations" is speculation from the journalist, what about FFXIV, or Sleeping Dogs, for all that we know all console games are underperforming.
I'll just quote the whole thing.
|
• Digital Entertainment
The operation of “DRAGON QUEST X,” a major MMORPG, started in August, 2012, has been showing steady progress.
|