By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Wii U GPU Die Image! Chipworks is AWESOME!

Turkish said:
ethomaz said:

The guys in gaf are hilarious because the thinks looks worst know... the 640 thing was a mistake.

I love speculations.

Edit - The latest theory...

160 x 2 x .55 = 176GFLOPs... That is extremely crazy too! LOL


So its worse than was thought?

that's an impossible number though lol, shit wouldn't be able to run Batman AC then.



Around the Network
blackstarr said:
That thread on Neogaf is literally the most tech-nerd crazy thread ever. I have no idea what people are saying in there.
YOU PEOPLE SPEAK A DIFFERENT LANGUAGE :l

lol

For now the gaf tech guys are saying the GPU is weaker than the Xenos (360) or RSX (PS3).

That's too weak to be true.



This is me trying to understand what's going on here



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

The guys in GAF needed to open a new thread to discuss... lol lol lol

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=47300747



The best parser for now...

Red are the (presumed) shader clusters. Blue are the (presumed) TMUs.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=47300888&postcount=4



Around the Network

I'm not completely sure what's going on here...
But that seems to be rusted.



Like i said it is probably pretty close to a HD6450 with 4 extra TMSU's. A HD6450 @ 625 mhz does about 200 GFLOPS. It's mostly the fact that the Wii U's gpu is clocked slightly lower that causes the number to plunch below 200 GFLOPS. But GFLOPS don't tell the whole story, for example the RSX of the PS3 is capable of 400 GFLOPS but is generaly regarded as slightly less powerfull than the 360's Xenos witch does 240 GFLOPS.



Seriously WHAT DOES THIS MEAN



http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/profile/92109/nintendopie/ Nintendopie  Was obviously right and I was obviously wrong. I will forever be a lesser being than them. (6/16/13)

In any case, while FLOPS help measure the performance of a computer component, a higher number doesn't always mean a better performance. See AMD and nVidia GPUs for comparison, AMD's usually have much higher FLOPS count, but that doesn't mean they will perform much better than their counterpart in a real world scenario... but then again, this is an AMD GPU we're talking about.



Otakumegane said:
Seriously WHAT DOES THIS MEAN

The opposite of exciting (I don't know the english word for that).