Kaizar said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
fordy said: Nintendo's compromises generally relate to regulation of publishers (which is why many dislike them) in order to protect consumers. Sony's compromises generally relate to regulation of consumers, in order to protect publishers. |
Not true. Nintendo makes tech specifically for themselves then forces the devs to make games for them, Sony and Microsoft provide the specs and let the devs roam free. Before Sony came Nintendo had third party devs under the rule of a locked chip on the SNES.
|
How do you explain the Sega Genesis & PS1 & Sega Dreamcast?
Plus the Wii U is as easy to develop for as the 360.
And both the 3DS & Wii U give 3rd parties 100% freedom to make the kind of games they want, like Binding of Isaac 3DS. This also means that the 3DS & Wii U can have games that have more blood and gore and so fort in them then games for PS & Xbox.
So both PS3/PS4 & 360/720 limits the mature content while the 3DS & Wii U allow every disgusting thing to be made. And the Wii U also allows more indie developers to make games for it then PS3/PS4 & 360/720.
|
How do you explain the Sega Genesis & PS1 & Sega Dreamcast?
Nintendo had been holding Sega back for a long time by holding down third party devs who depended on their specs which were better than Segas at the time. After the Genesis era it was all Segas fault with huge internal miscommunication. Nintendo succeeded in keeping the bulk of the games away from Sega. Sega eventually got the third party titles slowly as their marketshare expanded during the genesis era and was seen as the "cool" console compared to Nintendo who remained traditional and family friendly.
Plus the Wii U is as easy to develop for as the 360.
The Wii U wont be competing against the 360 next year. This is where Nintendo pays the piper for alienating third parties yet again. They will be ignored. No one cares that its easier to develop for compared to old tech.
And both the 3DS & Wii U give 3rd parties 100% freedom to make the kind of games they want, like Binding of Isaac 3DS. This also means that the 3DS & Wii U can have games that have more blood and gore and so fort in them then games for PS & Xbox.
The 3DS gives devs freedom because its a current gen portable and has low budget titles that can amass major amounts of profit for their development. Handhelds have always been Nintendos most popular platform. The Wii U is having a hard time nailing its market and when the next gen consoles launch do you think the western devs will have pity on Nintendo and dumb down every game for them? No. The third party devs have been empowered by Sony and Microsoft and Nintendo no longer calls the shots.
So both PS3/PS4 & 360/720 limits the mature content while the 3DS & Wii U allow every disgusting thing to be made. And the Wii U also allows more indie developers to make games for it then PS3/PS4 & 360/720.
Western devs made sure to ask Sony and Microsoft for 8GB of ram to last them the gen and they complied with the requests. Nintendo did not and they will lose probably 95% of the multiplats coming next gen unless they are dumbed down severely. Nintendo is screwing with last gen tech. Nintendo will have to fend for themselves and will barely be able to satisfy next gen engines when devs hope to expand levels to next gen status.