Sexist and ignorant I gather.  You're viewpoint is stereotypical and decades out of date.  It matters little to me though if you want to keep spouting your diatribe then knock yourself out.

Actually there is a fourth case that you've missed.

Case 4: The Dad owns the porn on the SD card and put it into the 3DS by mistake lol.

This is something that most normal people would dismiss instantly, tell their kids something about Father Christmas making a mistake by putting in the wrong SD card and have a laugh about it afterwards with friends. This isn't the first time something has happened like this and it won't be the last. Probably a Gamestop employee that was getting fired has put the dodgy SD card in to fuck with the company, or as I've already mentioned the Dad put the wrong card in by mistake. I think he doth protest too much lololol.

Seriously there's absolutely nothing wrong with porn, the people working on it (both male and female) and the people that sell it as long as it's stuff by consenting adults and doesn't involve animals.

haha, this was just too funny to read!!

If it was the father's SD card, he would have likely realised it almost immediately, and wouldn't have taken the issue to the media. Since he did take it to the media, we can fairly comfortably reject that case as not being consistent with what we know.

in before ban ya fuckers. all yoos dummies are idiots.

Welcome to America. Guess the kid is playing Resident Evil now und it's totally fine ;)

KylieDog, Why are you talking about the degradation of women in porn when both your avatar and signature feature pictures that are only made to arouse? If you're so respectful of women couldn't you have taken a picture of Jill Valentine without a 20 inch cleavage? And the pic in your signature of the girl with her breasts almost falling out of her dress? Is that not depicting women in a certain way? Or does it only become vile when a penile object comes into play?

It looks to me like you're perfectly fine with women being portrayed as sex objects.

As soon as you dismissed gay porn as less common, I realised that you really don't have a clue what you're talking about.

The humorous thing is that you made it explicitly clear that you refuse to even LOOK at porn for fear of it corrupting your brain, yet simultaneously claim to know the finer details of things like how common gay porn is relative to straight porn, and argue that most straight porn is rape porn (let's be honest, that's what you just claimed). It's utterly wrong, by the way - while there certainly is rape porn out there, I'm quite confident that it's a miniscule part of the market. Most guys (there are exceptions) don't actually get off on forcing a woman to have sex - they're turned on far more by a willing partner.

But hey, why bother understanding things, when it's easier to just spout platitudes, scream "political correctness", and then proclaim that the person you're arguing with is "benath" you? Much easier than actually debating a topic.

The irony you've shown in this thread is just remarkable.

The main claim against porn from a feminist point of view is, that it objectifies women. As does your avatar. Surely, the cleavage is no porn, but it is objectifying women. So, from the angle you criticised porn it is comparable to your avatar.

She didn't claim that the problem with porn is that it objectifies women. What she claimed, remarkably enough, is that most porn is rape porn, that most porn involves men raping women.