yeah happy maybe you shouldn't take evrything that's said as if they're talking about you.
@play4fun
there's a difference between acknowledging and being aggressive. I can acknowledge what is given but i don't tolerate condescension.
yeah happy maybe you shouldn't take evrything that's said as if they're talking about you.
@play4fun
there's a difference between acknowledging and being aggressive. I can acknowledge what is given but i don't tolerate condescension.
theprof00 said: yeah happy maybe you shouldn't take evrything that's said as if they're talking about you. @play4fun there's a difference between acknowledging and being aggressive. I can acknowledge what is given but i don't tolerate condescension. |
Yes, but you realize that I'm a Nintendo fan and that you generalized, right? It's incorrect.
The Vita has the hardware and it has the games to justify the price it currently has. Sony doesn't have the money for major advertising.
If there was a marketing campaign it would be doing much better than it is right now. But I would also like to point out that this thread was created to compare the 3DS to the Vita at the $250 price point. Wasn't saying anything about either system being bad or the future being grim.
I'm sure the Vita is profitable for Sony and that is the focus for the entire company right now.
i actually didn't say all ninty fans so slow your role.
I said ninty fans are doing x, like someone can say palestinians are rioting, orteens are getting pregnant at x school.
Play4Fun said:
So the reason 3DS wasn't selling like it should have is because of tech? Vita seems to have the tech, why is it selling so badly? Tech had nothing to do with 3DS' early struggles. |
If the 3DS had the Vita tech on top of the games its currently getting, it would have flown off the shelves at $250. It would be a steal.
Vita has the tech, but it doesn't have the 3rd party support(which is what sells Sony consoles).
Tech alone didn't affect the 3DS sales. it was a combination of bad press about the 3D feature, consumer confusion with the DS...etc.
Play4Fun said:
Also, if Sony had breathing room to drop the Vita's price, they would do so in a heartbeat. Don't fool yourself. |
Yeah I agree. Sony isn't in a position to take major losses. I know that. Dont' put words in my mouth.
That's why they HAVE to convince people to get a Vita for $250, they really have no choice.
Also, why wouldn't we compare sales of Ipads to a Vita or 3DS? Both are portable entertainment devices. I know I would have bought a Vita DAY 1 if it could have replaced my laptop.
theprof00 said:
|
Stop hating and start playing.
Izo said: Very good points. Can't wait to see what a 170 vita can do versus a 170 3DS. |
lol Nintendo will only again piss their pants and drop the price to $88
Moderated,
-Mr Khan
Although am a Nintendo fan I want the Vita sales to rise up so the competition forces Nintendo to make great games :)
Pachofilauri said: Although am a Nintendo fan I want the Vita sales to rise up so the competition forces Nintendo to make great games :) |
Nintendo will always make great games. Another handheld selling less than the Dreamcast did is not competition and the great games are still cumming.