By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - The Last of Us, best looking console game?

 

Is The Last of Us the best looking game?

Yeah 297 52.38%
 
No, there are others like... 270 47.62%
 
Total:567
exclusive_console said:

Out of the list LOS is beautiful and underrated,  GOW3 is amazing at times. U3 is ok. Others are much worst than this let alone KZ3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BXvLVL7AE0


What should this trailer proove? Let me guess, you are a PS3 fan.

Halo 4 looks twice as good as Killzone 3.



Around the Network

I also own a PS3 and played the hell out of Uncharted 2. But Uncharted 3 was extremely disappointing in terms of gameplay, online, fighting animations, glitches, length, aim sensitivity, difficulty, enemy AI (oh I'm being shoot now, am I supposed to cover?). And the second game almost didn't have one of those issues, why the sequel does? But the game is still being praised because of it's superior graphics, like you happyduds77 only showing me ONE picture that's supposed to be representative to the whole game-experience (?). Also pezus showing me a video of The Last of US which only shows the graphics/atmosphere, but the gameplay is simpler than a SNES game. And once again, why would a developer show the flaws in their game? With UC3 they also showed the parts with the least glitches or vulnerable to glitches. The final game had enough problems at launch.



pezus said:
enrageorange said:

Doesn't look any better than Uncharted 3 or 2, not that those games look bad, they are the best looking console games after all. Still has nothing on almost any recently made retail PC game. Poll choices are laughable though. Is last of us the best looking game ever, or some other ps3 exclusive.

They've constantly increased the quality of the animations though (and number of them). Uncharted 3 was more of a graphical evolution than revolution, sure, and I expect The Last of Us to be a small evolution too but not that noticable.

your probably right. Maybe its because of how good Uncharted 2 looked when it first came out, compared to all other console games. My eyesight isn't the best so I simply don't notice the smaller improvements Naughty Dog has made.





LilChicken22 said:

[Bla bla bla. Nothing constructive to say] ...but the gameplay is simpler than a SNES game. [Bla bla bla. More baseless diatribe.]


Now, that's pushing it a little bit to far.

You're not even remotely subtle anymore.



@Hynad

Go play some Super Metroid, Zelda Link to the Past, Chrono Trigger, and you'll understand. Compared to those titles, Last of Us looks pretty casual.



Around the Network
LilChicken22 said:
@Hynad

Go play some Super Metroid, Zelda Link to the Past, Chrono Trigger, and you'll understand. Compared to those titles, Last of Us looks pretty casual.


As if I didn't grow up with those games. ¬_¬

Now, you should definitely update your definition of casual. Because The Last of Us, and probably most of the games you put in that category, does't fit the definition at all. 

Do you know what the game of Go is? If I apply your logic here, then every games out there is casual compared to it. ¬_¬



Yes on consoles it is and for PS360 there won't be anything better anymore



LilChicken22 said:

I also own a PS3 and played the hell out of Uncharted 2. But Uncharted 3 was extremely disappointing in terms of gameplay, online, fighting animations, glitches, length, aim sensitivity, difficulty, enemy AI (oh I'm being shoot now, am I supposed to cover?). And the second game almost didn't have one of those issues, why the sequel does? But the game is still being praised because of it's superior graphics, like you happyduds77 only showing me ONE picture that's supposed to be representative to the whole game-experience (?). Also pezus showing me a video which only show the graphics but the gameplay is simpler than a SNES game. And once again, why would a developer show the flaws in their game? With UC3 they also showed the parts with the least glitches or vulnerable to glitches. The final game had enough problems at launch.

Let's see.

Gameplay: Uncharted 3: Drakes Deception lets you shoot, climb, take cover and solve puzzles.

Online: Uncharted 3: Drakes Deception is one of the best[if not the best] third person shooter multi-player game

Animations: Uncharted 3: Drakes Deception has one of the best animations on the market

glitches: Every single game has glitches

length: Not short, but not long either[12 hours]

the rest are the flaws of Uncharted 3: Drakes Deception

If you want me to post billions of screenshots, i can do that, but what is the point, you are such an ignorant.

And the sentence i underlined on your comment shows how ignorant you are.

Once again buddy you got pwned



Happyduds77

Uncharted 3 12 hours? I think you're confusing it with another game lol. My single player didn't last longer than 7,5 hours, no I'm not joking. It wasn't worth the 60 bucks at all. Why 7,5 hours when Among Thieves was +/- 11 hours with separate co-op levels.



LilChicken22 said:

I also own a PS3 and played the hell out of Uncharted 2. But Uncharted 3 was extremely disappointing in terms of gameplay, online, fighting animations, glitches, length, aim sensitivity, difficulty, enemy AI (oh I'm being shoot now, am I supposed to cover?). And the second game almost didn't have one of those issues, why the sequel does? But the game is still being praised because of it's superior graphics, like you happyduds77 only showing me ONE picture that's supposed to be representative to the whole game-experience (?). Also pezus showing me a video of The Last of US which only shows the graphics/atmosphere, but the gameplay is simpler than a SNES game. And once again, why would a developer show the flaws in their game? With UC3 they also showed the parts with the least glitches or vulnerable to glitches. The final game had enough problems at launch.


If you want to look for ''simple gameplay'' look no furhter than every Mario 2D game and ZombiU