By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Catalonian Independence?

DieAppleDie said:
Kynes
actually the basque dialects are the ones that remain unchanged since who knows
Batua is only a way to try to make Euskara live, making it more accesible for newcomers, but the roots are the very same (verbs, sufixes..etc)


Dialects that will die due to Batua and normalization. Regarding the unchanged since who knows show something claim, only languages that aren't talked are fixed, as it happens with the dead ones. Why the Latin that is taught nowadays is the same as it was talked twenty centuries ago? because it's a dead language. You can't say the language is the same since two millenniums ago, and that it is a live language.



Around the Network
JEMC said:
Kynes said:

You can believe whatever you want, I'm not going to change it, but you can't change history. That region where you born was part of Hispania province of the roman empire, latter it was part of the Visigode Spain, then was part of the Kingdom of Navarra, that later it adheres to the kingdom of Castilla, and then Castilla and Aragon adhere to form Spain, more than five hundred years ago. The historic regions of Spain are Castilla, Leon, Navarra and Aragon, the Basque region wasn't ever a kingdom or an independent country, and Catalonia was a region of Aragon. If you want to talk before the roman empire, then we will witness the atomization of every modern country, as then there weren't big countries due to the communication problems and lack of infrastructures.

The biggest problem in Spain is to cede the education system to the regions, an education system that leaves the regions the freedom to teach a false history. That's what the pro independence politicians saw clearly, and the other politicians didn't saw it.

Actually that's incorrect. During the Reyes Catolicos era, there were "las Españas". Both Spain and Aragon had their own laws and currency. And when Isabel died Fernando wasn't allowed to become the king of Castilla.

It wasn't until the 1700's with Felipe V and after a war that Spain became what it is.

So Felipe II wasn't King of Spain, but of the Spains. It's the first notice that I have.



Troll_Whisperer said:
Kynes said:
Troll_Whisperer said:
Kynes said:
Troll_Whisperer said:

 

haxxiy said:
Troll_Whisperer said:
To be honest if we (Basques) ever gain independence I'd prefer if we wouldn't join the EU. I think we'd be better off with real independence, our own currency, etc. like Switzerland or Norway.

I also want to say it's sad that the oldest nation, with the oldest language alive in Europe is not allowed to decide what it wants be.


There's no such thing as an older or newer language. Their study should be interpreted under a dialetical aspect instead of something of means and ends, for they evolve and change as time passes. Basque evolved from proto-basque who in turn came from pre-proto-basque and so on. Every language spoken on Europe has a background as rich, if not much richer - since they were subject to the contact with way more cultures - than Basque. 


Ok, fair enough. Perhaps the 'most unchanged' I guess. But its a reasonable argument.

 

Like I said above, I prefer to focus on the present though, despite my brief moment of pride :p

Are you talking of the Euskara Batua? rofl.

Not necessarily.

Seeing as you're not adressing the other things I said I'm gonna assume you haven't got many arguments.

Not gonna argue with you further.

You can believe whatever you want, I'm not going to change it, but you can't change history. That region where you born was part of Hispania province of the roman empire, latter it was part of the Visigode Spain, then was part of the Kingdom of Navarra, that later it adheres to the kingdom of Castilla, and then Castilla and Aragon adhere to form Spain, more than five hundred years ago. The historic regions of Spain are Castilla, Leon, Navarra and Aragon, the Basque region wasn't ever a kingdom or an independent country, and Catalonia was a region of Aragon. If you want to talk before the roman empire, then we will witness the atomization of every modern country, as then there weren't big countries due to the communication problems and lack of infrastructures.

The biggest problem in Spain is to cede the education system to the regions, an education system that leaves the regions the freedom to teach a false history. That's what the pro independence politicians saw clearly, and the other politicians didn't saw it.

Cool. Again, I care about what people want now. You're still not addressing my main point.

Your main point is that you want to decide if you want to be part of Spain or not? I'm not against it, if your region wants an economic suicide, then so be it. Having a socialist country in the north of Spain is not a problem per se, the best of the people born there will leave that paradise to find success in warmer lands. Bildu wants to create a socialist authoritarian regime, and the day your region gets the independence is the first day of the end of the EAJ, and they know it.



Kynes said:
JEMC said:

Te estás yendo por la tangente.

I was talking about signed and aproved deals that both the central and the regional government accepted, like "L'estatut" where it says that the central government has to make some payments. the problem is that some of those payments haven't been done.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to defence the Generalitat, it has done very, very bad decisions that should be ammended as soon as possible as well as stop spending money on certain things (like the embassies), but that doesn't mean that the central government can violate the agreements they have signed.

Oh. and no, the way I see it, Madrid doesn't hate us. But just let me say that Madrid is not Spain (something that many tend to forget), and that we aren't specially welcomed either.

Remember what happened with Endesa, a company which has Catalonia as their biggest market? How they fought to avoid Gas Natural buying it even though it would still be spanish only to sell it to an italian company? That wasn't hate, it's worse and more stupid: "you" (in general, not to you) just don't like us.

eON offered more money, only that, but you should remember that Gas Natural wanted endesa at most at ~20€ share, and the final offer was over 45 euros share. It's something that any CEO would do, when some company tries to make an hostile takeover, it's your obligation to search for another company that wants to pay more.  Endesa was a private held company, and the government tried to make Pizarro accept the Gas Natural offer, but he did what anyone would do, create value to the shareholders. I can remember you that the Italian company entered in the auction because the Spanish government didn't want a German company controlling Endesa.

The l'estatut can say whatever it wants, as the other estatutos say, but if you add what all the estatutos say they deserve, we have a country that has to provide the regions more than 100% of the income. That's factually impossible, and Mas knows it. We had an incompetent government that made promises to all the regions, promises that are impossible to comply with, and now we have this irresolvable sudoku as Solbes (socialist economy minister) called it.

When I talk about Madrid, I'm only repeating what the politicians there say, everything bad comes from Madrid, everything is Madrid's fault.

The government tried to force the sellout to Gas Natural... right.

And what I said is that whatever has been agreeded to and signed has to be respected. If you agree to pay certain services then you have to pay them, otherwise you are violating the law.

Anyway, if someone who is not from Spain is following the discussions that we are having here, they will realize how bad the situation is. We don't see the same thing in the same way. That's the problem, and I'm affraid that there is no solution for that.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Kynes said:
Troll_Whisperer said:
Kynes said:
Troll_Whisperer said:
Kynes said:
Troll_Whisperer said:

 

haxxiy said:
Troll_Whisperer said:
To be honest if we (Basques) ever gain independence I'd prefer if we wouldn't join the EU. I think we'd be better off with real independence, our own currency, etc. like Switzerland or Norway.

I also want to say it's sad that the oldest nation, with the oldest language alive in Europe is not allowed to decide what it wants be.


There's no such thing as an older or newer language. Their study should be interpreted under a dialetical aspect instead of something of means and ends, for they evolve and change as time passes. Basque evolved from proto-basque who in turn came from pre-proto-basque and so on. Every language spoken on Europe has a background as rich, if not much richer - since they were subject to the contact with way more cultures - than Basque. 


Ok, fair enough. Perhaps the 'most unchanged' I guess. But its a reasonable argument.

 

Like I said above, I prefer to focus on the present though, despite my brief moment of pride :p

Are you talking of the Euskara Batua? rofl.

Not necessarily.

Seeing as you're not adressing the other things I said I'm gonna assume you haven't got many arguments.

Not gonna argue with you further.

You can believe whatever you want, I'm not going to change it, but you can't change history. That region where you born was part of Hispania province of the roman empire, latter it was part of the Visigode Spain, then was part of the Kingdom of Navarra, that later it adheres to the kingdom of Castilla, and then Castilla and Aragon adhere to form Spain, more than five hundred years ago. The historic regions of Spain are Castilla, Leon, Navarra and Aragon, the Basque region wasn't ever a kingdom or an independent country, and Catalonia was a region of Aragon. If you want to talk before the roman empire, then we will witness the atomization of every modern country, as then there weren't big countries due to the communication problems and lack of infrastructures.

The biggest problem in Spain is to cede the education system to the regions, an education system that leaves the regions the freedom to teach a false history. That's what the pro independence politicians saw clearly, and the other politicians didn't saw it.

Cool. Again, I care about what people want now. You're still not addressing my main point.

Your main point is that you want to decide if you want to be part of Spain or not? I'm not against it, if your region wants an economic suicide, then so be it. Having a socialist country in the north of Spain is not a problem per se, the best of the people born there will leave that paradise to find success in warmer lands. Bildu wants to create a socialist authoritarian regime, and the day your region gets the independence is the first day of the end of the EAJ, and they know it.

So we agree then. Thank you.

Any mistakes that we make will be OUR mistakes and not the imposed mistakes of others, that's good enough and I'm glad that we think alike.



No troll is too much for me to handle. I rehabilitate trolls, I train people. I am the Troll Whisperer.

Around the Network
JEMC said:
Kynes said:
JEMC said:

Te estás yendo por la tangente.

I was talking about signed and aproved deals that both the central and the regional government accepted, like "L'estatut" where it says that the central government has to make some payments. the problem is that some of those payments haven't been done.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to defence the Generalitat, it has done very, very bad decisions that should be ammended as soon as possible as well as stop spending money on certain things (like the embassies), but that doesn't mean that the central government can violate the agreements they have signed.

Oh. and no, the way I see it, Madrid doesn't hate us. But just let me say that Madrid is not Spain (something that many tend to forget), and that we aren't specially welcomed either.

Remember what happened with Endesa, a company which has Catalonia as their biggest market? How they fought to avoid Gas Natural buying it even though it would still be spanish only to sell it to an italian company? That wasn't hate, it's worse and more stupid: "you" (in general, not to you) just don't like us.

eON offered more money, only that, but you should remember that Gas Natural wanted endesa at most at ~20€ share, and the final offer was over 45 euros share. It's something that any CEO would do, when some company tries to make an hostile takeover, it's your obligation to search for another company that wants to pay more.  Endesa was a private held company, and the government tried to make Pizarro accept the Gas Natural offer, but he did what anyone would do, create value to the shareholders. I can remember you that the Italian company entered in the auction because the Spanish government didn't want a German company controlling Endesa.

The l'estatut can say whatever it wants, as the other estatutos say, but if you add what all the estatutos say they deserve, we have a country that has to provide the regions more than 100% of the income. That's factually impossible, and Mas knows it. We had an incompetent government that made promises to all the regions, promises that are impossible to comply with, and now we have this irresolvable sudoku as Solbes (socialist economy minister) called it.

When I talk about Madrid, I'm only repeating what the politicians there say, everything bad comes from Madrid, everything is Madrid's fault.

The government tried to force the sellout to Gas Natural... right.

And what I said is that whatever has been agreeded to and signed has to be respected. If you agree to pay certain services then you have to pay them, otherwise you are violating the law.

Anyway, if someone who is not from Spain is following the discussions that we are having here, they will realize how bad the situation is. We don't see the same thing in the same way. That's the problem, and I'm affraid that there is no solution for that.

The socialist government? Sure. Ask Pizarro and the followings he had. eON paid more, and Enel even more, so I don't know why you keep saying that Endesa should have been sold to Gas Natural. The politic side was introduced by Gas Natural, not by Endesa.

So any promise, as absurd as it is, should be kept by the following government? Let me see, so if the government promises to give 90% of the money to Andalusia, they should keep that promise in any case? The government has to make compromises, and you can't give to everyone the money some guy before you promised, because this makes any country non governable, and we as taxpayers suffer it with some of the highest tax rates of the world.

In any country you have differences, the problem resides in politicians that use that differences to create problems where there weren't, and to search for an enemy that diverts the attention of your policies.



Kynes said:
JEMC said:
Kynes said:

eON offered more money, only that, but you should remember that Gas Natural wanted endesa at most at ~20€ share, and the final offer was over 45 euros share. It's something that any CEO would do, when some company tries to make an hostile takeover, it's your obligation to search for another company that wants to pay more.  Endesa was a private held company, and the government tried to make Pizarro accept the Gas Natural offer, but he did what anyone would do, create value to the shareholders. I can remember you that the Italian company entered in the auction because the Spanish government didn't want a German company controlling Endesa.

The l'estatut can say whatever it wants, as the other estatutos say, but if you add what all the estatutos say they deserve, we have a country that has to provide the regions more than 100% of the income. That's factually impossible, and Mas knows it. We had an incompetent government that made promises to all the regions, promises that are impossible to comply with, and now we have this irresolvable sudoku as Solbes (socialist economy minister) called it.

When I talk about Madrid, I'm only repeating what the politicians there say, everything bad comes from Madrid, everything is Madrid's fault.

The government tried to force the sellout to Gas Natural... right.

And what I said is that whatever has been agreeded to and signed has to be respected. If you agree to pay certain services then you have to pay them, otherwise you are violating the law.

Anyway, if someone who is not from Spain is following the discussions that we are having here, they will realize how bad the situation is. We don't see the same thing in the same way. That's the problem, and I'm affraid that there is no solution for that.

The socialist government? Sure. Ask Pizarro and the followings he had. eON paid more, and Enel even more, so I don't know why you keep saying that Endesa should be sold to Gas Natural.

So any promise, as absurd as it is, should be kept by the following government? Let me see, so if the government promises to give 90% of the money to Andalusia, they should keep that promise in any case? The government has to make compromises, and you can't give to everyone the money some guy before you promised, because this makes any country non governable.

In any country you have differences, the problem resides in politicians that use that differences to create problems where there weren't, and to search for an enemy that diverts the attention of your policies.

Of course Pizarro as only doing its job... that's why there weren't pressures from anyone to avoid the sell to Gas Natural (which I never said that it should have done, I only stated what happened) and that' swhy Pizarro wasn't one the list of candidates of the PP for the elections. Just because he was impartial.

And I'm not talking about promises. I'm talking about signed deals which are law. You can break promises, but as a government you can't break the law. And as stupid as it gets, if someone had signed a law that makes them give 90& of the money to X, then by law they should do it. And then be accused of malpractice and whatever else can be used against him for being that stupid.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:
Kynes said:
JEMC said:
Kynes said:

eON offered more money, only that, but you should remember that Gas Natural wanted endesa at most at ~20€ share, and the final offer was over 45 euros share. It's something that any CEO would do, when some company tries to make an hostile takeover, it's your obligation to search for another company that wants to pay more.  Endesa was a private held company, and the government tried to make Pizarro accept the Gas Natural offer, but he did what anyone would do, create value to the shareholders. I can remember you that the Italian company entered in the auction because the Spanish government didn't want a German company controlling Endesa.

The l'estatut can say whatever it wants, as the other estatutos say, but if you add what all the estatutos say they deserve, we have a country that has to provide the regions more than 100% of the income. That's factually impossible, and Mas knows it. We had an incompetent government that made promises to all the regions, promises that are impossible to comply with, and now we have this irresolvable sudoku as Solbes (socialist economy minister) called it.

When I talk about Madrid, I'm only repeating what the politicians there say, everything bad comes from Madrid, everything is Madrid's fault.

The government tried to force the sellout to Gas Natural... right.

And what I said is that whatever has been agreeded to and signed has to be respected. If you agree to pay certain services then you have to pay them, otherwise you are violating the law.

Anyway, if someone who is not from Spain is following the discussions that we are having here, they will realize how bad the situation is. We don't see the same thing in the same way. That's the problem, and I'm affraid that there is no solution for that.

The socialist government? Sure. Ask Pizarro and the followings he had. eON paid more, and Enel even more, so I don't know why you keep saying that Endesa should be sold to Gas Natural.

So any promise, as absurd as it is, should be kept by the following government? Let me see, so if the government promises to give 90% of the money to Andalusia, they should keep that promise in any case? The government has to make compromises, and you can't give to everyone the money some guy before you promised, because this makes any country non governable.

In any country you have differences, the problem resides in politicians that use that differences to create problems where there weren't, and to search for an enemy that diverts the attention of your policies.

Of course Pizarro as only doing its job... that's why there weren't pressures from anyone to avoid the sell to Gas Natural (which I never said that it should have done, I only stated what happened) and that' swhy Pizarro wasn't one the list of candidates of the PP for the elections. Just because he was impartial.

And I'm not talking about promises. I'm talking about signed deals which are law. You can break promises, but as a government you can't break the law. And as stupid as it gets, if someone had signed a law that makes them give 90& of the money to X, then by law they should do it. And then be accused of malpractice and whatever else can be used against him for being that stupid.

So Endesa had to be sold undervalued by more than a 50% because you say so. Ok, that's completely reasonable. The politic affiliation of the CEO of the company has nothing to do, it's a clear ad-hominem attack that has nothing to do with good for the shareholder practices.

I will say it again. Catalonia has in it's estatut that Spain has to provide them ~19% of all the money taxed in Spain, due to their GPD, and they have to provide all the funds necessary to keep that GPD. Andalusia more or less the same due to population. Castille and León the same due to extension, Aragón due to the river and some other absurd thing... this is written in all the regional laws, not only in the Catalan one, and every region says their motive to get more money that the others. If we have to provide everyone what their laws say, Spain has to provide much more than a 100% of the income. The problem lies mainly in Catalonia, where their politicians see this but they ignore that what they ask for is impossible, because it's impossible to comply with all the estatutos.

Are you telling me that we should ignore all the other estatutos, and only comply with the Catalan one?

I would love a true federal country, where the central government has a smaller federal tax, and regions have to tax their citizens, that would be funny. The lack of fiscal responsability is one of our main problems.



Kynes said:

So Endesa had to be sold undervalued by more than a 50% because you say so. Ok, that's completely reasonable. The politic affiliation of the CEO of the company has nothing to do, it's a clear ad-hominem attack that has nothing to do with good for the shareholder practices.

I will say it again. Catalonia has in it's estatut that Spain has to provide them ~19% of all the money taxed in Spain, due to their GPD, and they have to provide all the funds necessary to keep that GPD. Andalusia more or less the same due to population. Castille and León the same due to extension, Aragón due to the river and some other absurd thing... this is written in all the regional laws, not only in the Catalan one, and every region says their motive to get more money that the others. If we have to provide everyone what their laws say, Spain has to provide much more than a 100% of the income. The problem lies mainly in Catalonia, where their politicians see this but they ignore that what they ask for is impossible, because it's impossible to comply with all the estatutos.

Are you telling me that we should ignore all the other estatutos, and only comply with the Catalan one?

*sigh*

I said it and I wil said it again: I was talking about the situation that happened when Gas Natural made the offer. It was perfectly reasonalbe to say no, what wasn't reasonable were the other "reasons" weilded by many polititians, the press but also the same Pizarro to go against it. Done?

And as I said, any estatuto is a law. It's simple as that. Were the ones that made it idiots? So what, the problem is that unless you change the law you are forced to accept it and act by it.

And I haven't said anything to imply your last sentence. The answer to that is an obvious NO, and just bringing that question to this debate is offensive.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:
Kynes said:

So Endesa had to be sold undervalued by more than a 50% because you say so. Ok, that's completely reasonable. The politic affiliation of the CEO of the company has nothing to do, it's a clear ad-hominem attack that has nothing to do with good for the shareholder practices.

I will say it again. Catalonia has in it's estatut that Spain has to provide them ~19% of all the money taxed in Spain, due to their GPD, and they have to provide all the funds necessary to keep that GPD. Andalusia more or less the same due to population. Castille and León the same due to extension, Aragón due to the river and some other absurd thing... this is written in all the regional laws, not only in the Catalan one, and every region says their motive to get more money that the others. If we have to provide everyone what their laws say, Spain has to provide much more than a 100% of the income. The problem lies mainly in Catalonia, where their politicians see this but they ignore that what they ask for is impossible, because it's impossible to comply with all the estatutos.

Are you telling me that we should ignore all the other estatutos, and only comply with the Catalan one?

*sigh*

I said it and I wil said it again: I was talking about the situation that happened when Gas Natural made the offer. It was perfectly reasonalbe to say no, what wasn't reasonable were the other "reasons" weilded by many polititians, the press but also the same Pizarro to go against it. Done?

And as I said, any estatuto is a law. It's simple as that. Were the ones that made it idiots? So what, the problem is that unless you change the law you are forced to accept it and act by it.

And I haven't said anything to imply your last sentence. The answer to that is an obvious NO, and just bringing that question to this debate is offensive.


Then we have a problem, as we can't provide everything every estatuto asks for. Are you really asking the bolded part? I don't think they are idiots, I think they are politicians, they ignore the reality and they try to mold it to their convenience. We have a stalemate situation, there is no political party that will explain that the estatutos are absurd taken all as an unity (maybe UPyD) so the main political parties will try to ignore them as they can't revoke them. The constitutional tribunal should have revoked the economic clauses, but they decided to pass everyone due to political reasons, and we are now in a lose-lose situation.