JEMC said:
*sigh* I said it and I wil said it again: I was talking about the situation that happened when Gas Natural made the offer. It was perfectly reasonalbe to say no, what wasn't reasonable were the other "reasons" weilded by many polititians, the press but also the same Pizarro to go against it. Done? And as I said, any estatuto is a law. It's simple as that. Were the ones that made it idiots? So what, the problem is that unless you change the law you are forced to accept it and act by it. And I haven't said anything to imply your last sentence. The answer to that is an obvious NO, and just bringing that question to this debate is offensive. |
Then we have a problem, as we can't provide everything every estatuto asks for. Are you really asking the bolded part? I don't think they are idiots, I think they are politicians, they ignore the reality and they try to mold it to their convenience. We have a stalemate situation, there is no political party that will explain that the estatutos are absurd taken all as an unity (maybe UPyD) so the main political parties will try to ignore them as they can't revoke them. The constitutional tribunal should have revoked the economic clauses, but they decided to pass everyone due to political reasons, and we are now in a lose-lose situation.