riderz13371 said:
Party Chat is a Joke
Ever since the Xbox 360 released, gamers have been shoving it down the throats of PS3/Wii owners. At first I did agree that this was a very cool social feature...until I found out you had to pay to use it. I know you are still able to communicate through a headset if you're in a lobby with other players but if you want to start a party chat to communicate with friends while you all play different games, you have to pay for it. This just blows my mind. How a company makes you pay so that you can communicate with your friends just seems down right disgusting to me.
Yo Dawg, I Heard You Like To Pay
Another thing that really amazes me is how you have the option to use features such as Netflix on your console, but only if you are a Gold member. So basically you have to pay for Xbox Live...to pay for Netflix? *Cue the Xzibit meme*. I just don't understand why I have to pay for something just so I can have the OPTION to pay for a different service... Other consoles let you use these features but only if you pay the subscription for Netflix, so surely it can't be that hard for Microsoft to do it. But no, they just simply don't care. As long as the CEO's are filling their pockets with money they won't give a shit and will never change. I wan't to reiterate that i'm saying this from a gamer's perspective and not a Sony/Nintendo fanboy's perspective. I just feel ashamed that Microsoft gets away with these type of silly things. Shame on you Microsoft.
Microsoft, You're Setting A Bad Example
|
Party Chat: hm. Every communication company charges money for communicating. Phones, internet,... is that really a weird thing? Yeah you have whatsapp, right? But you still pay for the connection of your phone (I won't put down all other negative points of that stupid app here).
Yo Dawg, I Heard You Like To Pay: This is, after years, the first point that is not just lame "I hate M$" wrapped in words. Good point. I don't use any TV services on consoles so that's why it never bothered me but I see what you mean. But after all, it's $2 a month if you get gold on ebay. It's like paying a monthly fee for video rentals. I don't know if that's common in many countries but I know shops where you pay a small fee (like $2), even if you don't rent any game/video. But if you do, it's an extra fee, of course.
Microsoft, You're Setting A Bad Example: it's not 100% bad because you get real good things for your $2. Sure, you COULD have it for free but no company has those services all for free. Also, the servers are simply better than those of the others (consoles; not PC stuff, steam etc.). DLC is crap, yes. It's bullshit that developers (or publishers!? they are the ones to blame) are planning DLC from the start, putting it on the disc and then you have to pay $10 for a 2KB update that unlocks it. But is that really Microsoft's fault? Did they start it? Are they the only ones supporting it? Even if they were, the gamers could have stood against it to make the companies realize they can't fuck with customers.