I know what he said was inaccurate, but (realistically) all of these companies do it ... Remember Microsoft's DirectX 10 sales pitch?

They took (one of) the most technically backwards DirectX 9 games (Halo which was built around the XBox and saw a rough port to the PC years later) and compared it against one of the most teachnical advanced DirectX 10 games that required a system that was (well over) 10 times as powerful simply to run.

I was pointing out that most marketing is slimy and slippery and they try to make the most outrageous claims they can make without directly lying. Realistically Reggie probably has seen third party games that will be released next year and probably feels comfortable making that claim today; even though what he said isn't correct.

nintendo are making themselves look stupid. whos gonna be impressed by wii u having better graphics than 6-7 year old consoles? if it has better graphics than the next playstation and xbox than they can boast about it.

Now you are moving on to something entirely different. And yes others do bs like this too and they get called out for it as well. Doesn't make outright lying like this acceptable.

False.

Best version: 360 (better graphics and performance)

Between Wii and PS3: best graphics (Wii U) / best performance (PS3)

He's right.

But CoD doesn't perform better.

Reggie was lying about CoD looking dramatically better on WiiU, but telling the truth about the U being much more graphically capable. I guess he was trying to emphatically shoot down the false staement by the interviewer that the system is "on par" with the exsisting options. Truth is, if you tell most people that CoD looks better on U, they will believe it or convince themselves of it. Most don't care or can't tell.

No. Even in visuals the Wii U version can't top the 360... in  performance the 360 and PS3 versions are another game... anyway the 360 version is the best one (visual ans performance).

From the article people keep pointing out, the versions are about the same but the Wii U version doesn't have the v-sync issues of the 360 version. It's not dramatically better like he said, but he does have access to information that we don't. I think this could be interpreted as a stealth hint at what we can expect from post-launch games.

Chandler said: Euphoria14 said: When he said their "tablet" can do things the competitors can't she should have hit him with multitouch.   So you pick one thing the Wii U pad doesn't have and ignore the advantages alltogether? That's sounds reasonable. I guess proper gaming controls, lag free streaming and seamless switching between TV and Gamepad play doesn't stack up against multitouch.

There is much more than that which separates it from that of an iPad or any android/windows tablet.

He shouldn't be comparing them to begin with. Multitouch adds plenty of options by the way, not just for gaming.

By the way, I have no issues with the WiiU. 

What articles?

That says otherwise: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off

PS. A game suposed to run at 60fps falling in 32 or 26fps.