MOBA's don't no.

And I don't see how it does work both ways.  No genres work better on consoles then PC... since PC can do everything consoles can do.

Consoles are essentially lobotomized PCs.

One reason console games are better:

Nintendo

As a PC gamer (since 03), who has a ps3 and ps vita on the side, i can honestly say the main advantage of pc gaming is the ability to move forward. The consoles stagnate somewhat and offer little excitement.

Dont get me wrong, my ps3 (since 08), is a good piece of kit and at the time i bought it, i was hooked but it fizzled out as the games visuals and variety stagnated into the same pretty much.

The reason i have the ps3 and ps vita even though im a 'pc gamer' is they are they to offer what the pc cant, which is exclusives which the ps3 does a good job with and almost console like graphics on the move which is where the ps vita comes in.

But yes, i hear, you still think its not worht the price tag, you might be right, BUT, it cost more but thats because you get alot more in return, which is pc quality, graphics and better multiplayer. Company of heroes, battlefield 3, formula 1 2012, half life, css, warhammer dawn of war, planetside 2, wow, star wars tor, hell even the cod series etc etc all superior on the pc. Personally its not very common to see a poor console port to pc.

When i really think about why i dont play console really anymore its because...it has no depth to it, just generic setup same as everyone else which is outdated, and the whole console multiplayer is for the most part a let down because of the lack of people per online game which is boring when you can have double or triple that on its pc counterpart.

Give it a couple more years and those Exclusives will be on the PC via Emulation with better graphics than the PS3 could do.
PS2 emulation for instance has come a long way, you can pretty much play every PS2 game on PC these days. - Heck it runs PS2 games better than the PS3.

As I said the only reason not to be a PC gamer is lack of time or knowledge.
But even then buying a game off Steam and running it is as easy as using a console to the point where my grandmother buys steam games and plays them.

PCs have the latest graphics games but it comes at a huge cost. Annual upgrades are needed in order to play the latest PC games on the highest graphic setting. Consoles have to make do with the same specifications for an entire generation around 7 years. A PC gamer will have to make annual upgrades mainly graphic cards and possibly a second PC rig within the same 7 year time period. With unlimited funds PC gaming is much better than console gaming. 

Just five?

Or you could just not upgrade your PC, and just be content with graphics that are still way better then consoles, but just not maximized.

Really dont mean to be negative. But this is basically the elephant in the room that no gamer really wants to talk about.

Console gaming is now considered more mainstream and mass market with the advent of Wii/Kinect, etc. PC gaming still has the following stigma that ultimately hinders what the medium offers.

Not my opinion, but a general consensus of what non-gamers think of PC gamers.

Theres more PCs surely, but most gamers play on consoles.

While that is true you do get a lot of random slow down if you don't have the gpu that the game is made with. I can play most games at 1080p looking better then their console versions, but now and then the frame rate tanks to 10fps or lower and I have to go into the graphics settings to turn random stuff off temporarily or even lower the resolution. It's pretty annoying when everything runs fine for an hour until you get into a heavy fight in an area with heavy fog and you have to quit back to the settings and usually restart the game to be able to continue.
On consoles you can be assured of a baseline performance all the way through and not worry about settings.

I do wish consoles had certain graphics options though, like turning off motion blur and depth of field effects during gameplay. Heavy bloom can go too imo.