VGKing said:
oni-link said:
VGKing said: "Along with great titles, the PS Vita seem to be having a fire sale this holiday slashing the systems price to $199" It's not a fire sale, it's a Black Friday sale. There's a huge difference. Can Vita reach 5million sales by the end of the year? It would need to sell 1.8million more......I'd say that's impossible. TBH, it would be lucky to reach 4million. I've been seeing lots of Vita ads everywhere though. As I'm typing this there's a Vita $199 Black Friday ad on this site! Sony is definitely trying. I don't think we should consider Assassin's Creed or Black Ops Declassified failures yet, the bulk of their sales will be made during the next month. Maybe the $199 price point could become permanent if Sony sees it makes a huge difference. One thing is for sure though, VITA WILL NOT BE DISCONTINUED. As little as it is selling, it is selling.....I'd say worst case scenario, the Vita becomes a purely digital device within the next few years. |
With Sony's financial situation I wouldn't be too sure about it. The Vita is bleeding $$ at the moment and Sony is doing it's best for the system. It could only do so much until they realize the it would be a futile effort and move on; regardless of what the fans want the system must become profitable in order to be allocated funds!!! 
|
Vita is not bleeding money. If anything, Sony is making a small loss on each Vita. I'd say it'll be profitable by next Christmas at $250.
|
When was its bill of materials $160 (for the $299 model), January? Being made mostly of quite standard components, very similar to those we can fnd in a smartphone, their cost should have already dropped a few tens $. So it should be a few $ profitable now, even without adding a memory card and a game. Then there is to consider that the biggest costs, initial investments, have already been paid. Were the console not profitable overall, keeping on producing it would just increase losses, but once it became profitable, selling it as long as it's possible, even in small volumes, is the only way to recover part or all of the investments. Surely it makes more sense for Sony to keep on selling PSV than keeping on selling at a loss TVs in the middle and low range, where it struggles to compete alone, and only recently finally accepted the situation and started a joint venture with former archrival Panasonic.
This said, Sony should moneyhat, if necessary, Capcom for a Monster Hunter main title on PSV, maybe preceded by an appetizing MH port to avoid wasting the main title when HW base is still too small.
oni-link said:
VGKing said:
[...]
Vita is not bleeding money. If anything, Sony is making a small loss on each Vita. I'd say it'll be profitable by next Christmas at $250.
|
Far from it, since Kaz himself says that it will take 3 years b4 Vita will be profitable; but that's another matter. I really think Vita should sell 5 mil before Christmas day; especially seeing all the resources Sony has thrown for the system this year.
|
You are talking about two different things: stopping selling at a loss, that already happened, and recovering the initial losses, that can only happen later, obviously, but that if you stop selling when sales become profitable, can NEVER happen. Once the product stops selling at a loss, keeping on selling it as long as it's possible and viable is the only way to recover losses or at least reduce them.