ECM said:
JoeTheBro said:
ECM said:
pokoko said: I think it might be the best and most original innovation of this generation. We'll have to see how it takes hold next generation. |
Innovation? GameTap and other all-you-can-eat for a flat rate game services of the past decade say: "Hello there! We beat PS+ to the market by a huge margin, had a lot more games, and nobody said we were original or innovative! *sob*."
Don't get me (too) wrong, I am contemplating getting it for Vita, but it is not original *or* innovative if those words have any actual meaning anymore.
|
The inovative part is that you get to keep the games. After Infamous is taken off PS+ I get to keep playing it as if I owned the game. Granted it relies on me staying a member but since I plan to renew for the forseable future PS+ is nothing like renting. Instead Sony gives me two free games every month to play whenever, that is the service.
|
As long as you kept paying for GameTap, you got to 'keep' the games, too.
|
Gametrap has a library of games, that's it. With PS+ I have games that new members don't. I get to keep playing the game even after the opportunity to get it disappears, that's the revolutionary difference. Is it actually better to the consumer? No, not really apart from price but it sure does an excellent job at keeping people signed up.