By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which of the big 3 gets the most bashing/hate on VGC?

Tagged games:

 

Which do you think?

Nintendo 137 30.38%
 
Sony 223 49.45%
 
Microsoft 89 19.73%
 
Total:449
pezus said:
RolStoppable said:
pezus said:
Nintendo.

Just look at the article I rushed to post

The increasing evidence that they aren't serious about hardcore gamers?

I saw the picture of NSMBU. Being a hardcore gamer must mean to live a sad life.

Real hardcore gamers do play Mario, but they do it on their PCs ;o

Why? Those hardcore gamers doesn't have something else with more explosions and decapitations to play?

Are they closeted Mario fans? Or is this some sort of guilty pleasure they have?



Around the Network

Definitely Nintendo. People on VGC often complain about Nintendo for its lack of hardcore games, its lack of third party support, and the fact that it always feels like it's a generation behind its competitors.



There is this never ending power struggle between Sony vs Nintendo + MS. The MS and Nintendo camps take turns taking stabs at Sony for various reasons. Sony camp is usually in "defense force" mode to combat the nonsense. I have sensed for some time now that Sony is a victim of Nonconformist Conformatism. People love seeing a giant fall. Basically, Sony was an indisputable lead for 2 generations in a row, far more than Wii and any other main console. Not to mention the general bad blood due to HOW Sony first got into the business in the first place. MS also has always specifically had an out for Sony Playstation due to their fear it would replace the PC. A lot of this has emulated in the fanbases.
Sony is the Obama of gaming; every failure capitalized on but every accomplishment ignored. 360 fans often undermine any of the great PS3 exclusives because to admit that it has so many means to recognize they might not have backed a "winning" horse from jumping in so early(not sales wise). Nintendo fans are relishing in their victory finally after 2 straight losses and the fact Sony is on the bottom is icing on the cake after every game they ever loved was taken by PS1. There is a general consensus that Sony and it's fans alike are very arrogant(probably true) and everyone just wants to take them down a peg (media and opposing fans )....regardless if they are right or not about what a great products they have ;). Sony does do it's own share of just leaving themselves wide open for ridicule with some of their very poor choices.



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

I'm going to have to say they're all about equal, Sony gets hammered on for being poor, Nintendo gets hammered on for being kiddy and underpowered, Microsoft gets hammered on for not enough first party titles.



Hating is just another form of admiration. And as it is, vgchartz is wayyy tsundere for Sony.



Around the Network
pezus said:
Player2 said:
pezus said:
RolStoppable said:
pezus said:
Nintendo.

Just look at the article I rushed to post

The increasing evidence that they aren't serious about hardcore gamers?

I saw the picture of NSMBU. Being a hardcore gamer must mean to live a sad life.

Real hardcore gamers do play Mario, but they do it on their PCs ;o

Why? Those hardcore gamers doesn't have something else with more explosions and decapitations to play?

Are they closeted Mario fans? Or is this some sort of guilty pleasure they have?

It seems like your definition of hardcore is bit...wrong

Well, it seems that I'm not hardcore so obviously I don't know what they like in a videogame. But given the amount of hate Nintendo games get for being kiddie from those that call themselves hardcore, I suspected that hardcore gamers would prefer games with violence, girls, or foul languge.

But anyway, why those hardcore gamers that criticize Nintendo then play Mario games hidden in their basement, like a 14 year old who is hiding from his mother when he's masturbating?



In general: Nintendo
On VGChartz: Microsoft



Sal.Paradise said:
Hating is just another form of admiration. And as it is, vgchartz is wayyy tsundere for Sony.

OK, that made me smile.

"I hate you Sony, and didn't want to play your games, anyway.  Hmph!"

I am soo imagining that the next time one of the Team anti-Sony members pops in to flame.



Farsala said:
slowmo said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
slowmo said:
Nice poll to reflect user preference percentages


Are you being sarcastic? At this moment, 17% voted Nintendo.


Accuracy of a poll increases the more people that participate, check the numbers now.  I was not being sarcastic, I actually expect this to be a rough gauge of percentages of users affiliated with each console provider.  Sony first, Nintendo second, Microsoft third looks about right to reflect this.

You really believe 20% of fans on this site are MS? Seems like a lot less. Not only that Nintendo is way to low.

OT: The way I see it is Nintendo getting bashed the most for no reason, like Bayonetta 2, Wii U HW, games dont look next gen, it has mario? why not zelda, etc,etc


I think the majority of fans are Sony, followed by Nintendo then Microsoft.  Nearly every poll on this site reflects this.



pezus said:
Player2 said:

Well, it seems that I'm not hardcore so obviously I don't know what they like in a videogame. But given the amount of hate Nintendo games get for being kiddie from those that call themselves hardcore, I suspected that hardcore gamers would prefer games with violence, girls, or foul languge.

But anyway, why those hardcore gamers that criticize Nintendo then play Mario games hidden in their basement, like a 14 year old who is hiding from his mother when he's masturbating?

Are you asking a question or making a statement? Hardcore gamers can easily play Mario and still call them hardcore. To me, hardcore is about playing more games and perhaps a bit more "advanced" (that is, harder to learn) games compared to casuals. Casuals can play both Just Dance and Mario as well. Mario is really for everyone.

The first sentence is a statement (using a certain definition of hardcore), and the last one is a question.

I was using the term hardcore to describe those called "adult" in this post of your "Evidence That Nintendo is Not Serious About the Hardcore". I guess this is what happens when everyone uses his own definition of hardcore.

prayformojo said:
bananaking21 said:
 but to talk about the subject as a first party developer nintendo cant compete for the more adult gamer, with the "core" audience being mostly adults thats a problem nintendo wants to solve by attracting third party developers to make those more adult gamers. but when it comes to third party games MS and Sony will slaughter nintendo if they try to compete for the adult gamer, nintendo tried before to make games aimed at adults and failed miserably.

I think you nailed it when the "adult" thing. I've been saying that for YEARS. Nintendo delivers "core" titles, such as Metroid and Zelda. No one can deny that. But what they fail at is ADULT games. Games like Halo, Dead Space, GTA etc. They have NEVER been able to make games that the majority of grown men want to play. They have NEVER developed games with sex, drugs,violence and blood. Every game they release is pretty much kid safe, and that turns a lot of grown up people away from their systems. They think Nintendo, and then think "children". They think Sony, and they think "adult".

I would find shocking to see those grown men playing Nintendo games on their PC.