S.T.A.G.E. said: Drop the Vita and focus on the PS4. Thats what they need to do. |
Next year should be the last year Sony supports PS3. After that the console should just get 3rd party support, which surely will be good for a couple of years, but Sony should try to phase PS3 out after 2014 at the latest. After 2013 Sony should focus solely on PS4 and Vita. They shouldn't drop the Vita - what for? Just make it profitable and I'm sure that the story of PS3 and a surge in sales is possible for this handheld when they cut the price. Remember, the development costs for PS4 will be 2-3 time higher than the costs for a PS3 game, so many developers won't be able to make this jump easily. Cost of a Vita game is much smaller than the cost of a PS3 game, so it should be supported, since in 2-3 years the possibility of profiting on PS3 will be significantly smaller, than on a Vita, which will still be attractive as the "current gen" console.
PS3 could start competing with PS4 if both Sony and 3rd parties stay on this console instead of going full steam on PS4 and it would canibalise the PS4 sales. Vita is a handheld so it's not competing with a home console, that's why Sony has to convince 3rd parties to switch to Vita instead of staying with PS3. Supporting Vita is even better for Sony, since they would not only earn money from games, but people would have to buy new hardware, so this means additional revenue for Sony. Just think, one AAA PS4 game equals 5-6 AAA Vita games. Vita projects will be petty stuff in comparison to PS4 projects, and having simmilar price at retail will earn money. Vita just needs a couple good games and... good luck and good will. I hope it can make it.
dj2one said: I doubt Sony will release the most powerful hardware next gen, I think they are seeing that price and word of mouth and games move hardware after the sucess of the 360 and the Wii this gen.
|
I hope they'll release the most powerful console on the market or equally powerful but cheaper than X-box 8. MS plans (probably) to bundle Kinect 2 with the console, which allows Sony to buff up the console at the same price or sell an equal console cheaper. I couldn't care less about Kinect, so I'm down with both solutions, I think the second one is much better. Remember that PS3 was just marginally more powerful than the X360, but it was significantly more expensive. That's why MS managed to gain success.
I've been also calling for a year that PS4 will be 4k compatible. It won't play games at 4k, but will stream 4k TV, apps, etc. I will be very surpriced if they don't include 4k in PS4.
Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!
My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/
My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.