I prefer to have 3 unique companies when it comes to games. With that said, I prefer SONY's approach looking at what we have now. I don't want Nintendo to do what SONY does (don't ever expect them to, either) but I would like to see Nintendo try a few new things, though.

You simply can't ignore God of War. 

God of War has the biggest dedicated fan base out of all of Sony's IPs (https://www.facebook.com/godofwar.page?ref=ts), it's Sony's #1 most critically acclaimed and 2nd best-selling IP, whether you personally like it or not is irrelevant, if you're going to list a bunch of classic Playstation IPs you can't leave out the genre dominating God of War series. 

Team Ico games are nothing special, they sell very poorly and barely scrape by the right to be called critically acclaimed, LittleBigPlanet however is a successful and significant Sony IP. The Uncharted series is hardly any more significant or well-made than the Resistance, Killzone, Ratchet & Clank or Infamous series, only Uncharted 2 is commonly praised by a lot of people whereas Uncharted Vita and the first Uncharted received a universal 'meh' and Uncharted 3 is widely considered a disappointing sequel. Also every game in the series besides the first Uncharted has been massively bundled which makes them appear to roll with the truly big Sony IPs like Gran Turismo and God of War when really it isn't a big IP at all, it's just middling. 

And to answer your question, no. Nintendo should not 'copy' Sony. If you like the style of Sony's IPs then buy a Sony platform, same applies if you like the style of the IPs from Nintendo, Microsoft etc.

i was being sarcastic, when I said I was a Sony fan. So in other words I was saying I don't believe you are a Ninty fan. If you are so what? Again I ask, what does Ninty need to learn from Sony?

I was being sarcastic. I was pretty much saying he isn't a Ninty fan and I really don't care if he is or isn't. He ignored my question again.

No, I haven't played it.  I will say that it does look really good though.  

I'm not going to buy a PS3 either.  All my money gets thrown blindly in Nintendo's direction. 

If there is one Sony Studio that I would want Nintendo to aspire to and have similar in their collection, it would be Naughty Dog.

It's ridiculous to suggest that Nintendo should copy Sony and try to have a Team Ico type studio... those guys haven't released a new game since the PS2.

What I love about Sony is all the new IPs that they put their full budget behind... what I don't like about Sony is that their hardware/software teams don't work with any kind of harmony. It's their hardware engineers that are the bad part of the equation... working in secrecy, creating stuff that is hard to work with, creating stuff that is expensive and out of consumer ranges and not allocating enough of their talent on cost reduction efforts to stay competitive and profitable in the marketplace.

I am really hoping that Kaz Hirai can turn that ship around because it's headed right into an iceberg and then off a damn high cliff.

Wow :( I just found Chad Warden funny, thats all...

But yeah lemme keep it OT, I'm sorry for expressing my "lol"  expression on that Chad Warden face badly: I think the industry should learn from its competition, I would love to see a Gran Turismo-esque game by Nintendo, on the same way I wanna see a Pokemon wise game by Sony.

Sorry I'm late to the party on this one.

A few thoughts.

First of all, I think there is a big danger here of confusing descriptive terms with normative ones. Many words that video game enthusiasts and critics use to describe games -- dark, mature, epic, cinematic, surreal -- are useful in describing a video game, but not useful in assigning value.

Moreover, and I'm sure I'm in the minority on this, I believe video games should be moving farther away from movies, not closing in on them. Video games are a unique medium, and I think the closer the industry moves toward Hollywood, the worse it is for both.

That being said, the games you mentioned are of course brilliant. Ico is in my opinion the finest PS2 game, and Shadow of the Colossus is in the top 5. Nintendo should borrow from those games because they are mechanically sound, emotionally powerful, and fun to play. Not because they're darker or more sinister, or even more cinematic or surreal than Nintendo's own IPs.

Lastly, I think we have to but a moratorium on the "Nintendo makes games for kids" canard. Nintendo makes games for everyone. Some are good, some are bad, some are the greatest games of all time.

Zelda is mostly for kids even though it had a very good battle/exploration system. The game is very approachable to adults...except for the GC version in style. Metroid is the only solitary first party title Nintendo has made that could pass for a near mature title and there you have it, Nintendos least popular title. The Uncharted franchise in five games will outsell the whole Metroid series because thats just it, when you take the light hearted everyone games out of  equation sales drop. F-Zero....yeah....anyway, the rest are third party.

Sony...couldn't market to casuals if the tried (and they have). Sony is confined to the hardcore. The hardcore mentality is even in their commercials. Look at the salute to gamers commercial and the more comical move commercials. You cannot attract people to the move, it forces you to actually use  your body. Outside of lacking the proper software the move tech was sound, and demanded you actually follow through with your movements instead of being coddled and halfassing movements on the Wii. Sony is trying to catch the eye of the casuals to increase sales, but they need to think of many things including a color scheme specifically for children with bright solid tones. Their characters have to have memorable faces much like Nintendo. Nintendo attracts casuals like moth to a flame. It did for me when I was a really, really young and I am sure it did for you as well.

Nintendo should............... NEVER be like sony.