| MegaDrive08 said: So called gamers not supporting an actual video games company, who cares man its going to be successful anyway |
do you own all current gen consoles?
| Dodece said: I have no intention to do so, and I have a laundry list of reasons as to why. Firstly I have a little something called self respect. Nintendo skunked me this generation. After I had supported them for twenty years. I have given them many thousands of dollars, and they thought I was disposable. Well if you treat your customers so lightly it is pretty much damning evidence that you don't care at all. Secondly I have evolved beyond Nintendo. I am an adult, and I expect to be treated like I am an adult. Which means I want adult content in my games. Nintendo chooses to believe that everyone is perpetually eleven years old. Yes I want sex, and violence. Which Nintendo never puts in their games, and never will put in their games. It isn't just that though. I want actual stories, morals, and gasp realistic dialogue. I don't know why Nintendo thinks it is too good to put these last three things into their games. Thirdly as a developer Nintendo is completely uninspired, and particularly lazy to boot. They think only in terms of reiterations rather then re-imaginings, expansions, or progressions. They aren't making sequels so much as they are just making the same games over and over. A good developer wants to improve upon their concepts. That isn't what Nintendo does. They just copy the previous game, and resell it again for a profit. They are the gaming version of rigid traditionalists. Nintendo as a company is just a pack of backstabbing slackers who want to treat you like a child. The question shouldn't be why not. The question should be why. Why would you want to do business with a company that treats you with so little regard. They are utterly complacent about how they do things, and it shows in how little they are willing to adapt to serve your needs. What I find ironic is that both Microsoft and Sony which are bigger companies act more scrappy then Nintendo. They basically try a whole lot harder then Nintendo to create new things. Sure they have failures, but at least they are really trying. You never get that feeling from Nintendo. Why reward sloth. When you can reward the eager. |
OMG WHEN DID YOU COME BACK?
I've missed your long essays!!!!
I am not buying the Nintendo Wii U because I don't like its concept and I don't like a single Nintendo exclusive franchise. I'm only interested in the next Sony/Microsoft systems.
Also, my older brother plans on buying the Wii U when it eventually receives a price cut so I'll just play on his one if by some sort of miracle a game releases for it that even remotely interests me, highly unlikely but not impossible.
always owned one console every gen, not as fortunate as some, yes I could be called a Nintendo fanboy but I don't bash other games consoles, and yes I have played ps3/360 which I had fun with.
| MegaDrive08 said: always owned one console every gen, not as fortunate as some, yes I could be called a Nintendo fanboy but I don't bash other games consoles, and yes I have played ps3/360 which I had fun with. |
No-one will call you that as:
1. We're all friends & family here
2. It's a bannable offense
| MegaDrive08 said: always owned one console every gen, not as fortunate as some, yes I could be called a Nintendo fanboy but I don't bash other games consoles, and yes I have played ps3/360 which I had fun with. |
my point is simply that the original point you seemed to be making could also apply to you as you have only supported one of the 3 console manufacturers
although i guess you did specify "an actual video games company" so i guess maybe you have criteria that in your opinion excludes the other 2
I started on the amstrad cpc 6128 then had a mega drive then moved to ps1 then ps2 then this gen wii
darthdevidem01 said:
Would Squall Returns : Final Fantasy VIII be adequate? lol |
If SE made that game then i would have to destroy their HQ in disgust lol!!
Gnac said:
Does this mean that Sony lied about what was in the launch PS3, since they charged 2 hundo bux less than the reported component cost? HOELY SHITT. |
No it does not obviously. Just seems to be a given when you look at the price considering that Nintendo has never sold a console at a loss in the past. Don't get me wrong, I am not advocating that they sell it at a loss just pointing out that it is not the leap in power I am looking for from a next gen console.
I won't buy the Wii U, because
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
