It's true that major elections are only every four years, but this is donated money that are supplying jobs for some people that normally wouldn't have them.  Plus, it stimulates local businesses and what not.  Basically, my point is that the money being spent definitely isn't hurting anybody, it is only helping.  If the money wasn't being spent it would just be sitting in peoples bank accounts.

I agree, fox news is very biased, as is msnbc, and sadly enough people buy into that bias.  Myself, I tend to like CNN, they seem to have a pretty good unbiased approach, with both sides fairly equally represented.  I also agree that policy is pretty skimpy in the campaigns, sadly enough.  

Thats cool you pick democrats, there is no problem with that.  My point is that believing in stereotypes like republicans are more corrupt leads to flawed understanding of things.  Also, rejecting ideas and solutions from people just because they are coming from a conservative (republican) just leads to lack of understanding on the situation.  Being informed on both sides can only help you justify and apreciate your own position all the more.  good luck to ya.

but why belgium? they have the second highest tax for rich in europe or not? ask swiss, they always like to get the rich from countries around them lol

If you have to pay 10 million Euro in taxes but you have invested in Belgium or created jobs your tax will get very small..  Some major companies pay like 50 euro taxes..  

I hope realise you i am not actually american, i just tend to follow it's politics. And if I was I would only pick Obama, just to keep Romney out! Republicans have had some decent presidents, but not out of these lot now. 

I think for now, I will try to ignore political ideology and see if anyone at all, can find a solutions to fix this bad economy, as "both" sides have not really got one, at least not yet. Thanks, for the debate and thanks for enlighting me.

Finally, maybe some socialist policies just don't work like very high taxes (france), to be honest I don't mind charging high rates that I wouldn't want to pay!

Just like how some conservative policies like America's war on drugs clearly are not stopping drug trade or gangs

That's not a conservative policy... Obama has stepped up the WoD further than any recent president in recent history via raids of legal marijuana dispensaries.

It was originally started by Richard Nixon wasn't it? Who was conservative (republican) And as Obama is tougher than Bush on drugs (a mistake), wouldn't that make Obama more conservative on the war on drugs (as a single issue) than Bush?

Genetic fallacy. Its origin bear no relevance whatsoever for the issue at hand. Anyways that's how you are going to define what is a conservative policy and what's not? Is there some kind of invisible aether around the concept who makes it inherently conservative because Nixon started it? 

well a liberal would just legalise it wouldn't they? Also, Nixon was quite conservative. I can't really add to that, but conservatives generally like to crimenalise drugs and anything they can (even though, president abe lincoln and presidents before him used to grow marijuana themselves.) To me, the war on drugs is just a failed policy, that I doubt liberals would start