Usually most guys would like to last longer.  I usually only last about 8-20 mins on normal so with the foreskin I would probably last 4-10 mins.  I find it funny that people bring up the loss nerve feeling when modern society tries to instill that guys need to last at least 30 mins - hours.  The correct figure though is about 10-15 mins because if a girl can't achieve an orgasm by 15 mins then she probably won't during the session.  I really don't give a shit that my parents did it to me but I wouldn't do it to my son if I ever had one.  I can still achieve an orgasm and that is the only thing that really matters.

1.3% of deaths of newborn boys are caused by circumcison in the USA: http://www.readperiodicals.com/201004/2026622071.html
That are 117 in the year. That number seems low, but how many men die because of no circumcision in the year?

Personally, I am uncircumsized and extremely long winded in the sex department. I last too long I think with on avg 40-120mins. Sounds like gloating but its actually a curse because I usually let the other person get their rocks off and I just save mines for later cuz they rarely will put up with it that long haha.

Yet I see where you could be getting at. Yet if you could have a stronger orgasm vs lasting longer, I would always choose stronger. And taking me for example, I don't think the intensity of the pleasure necessarily has an effect on the timing. The "feeling" is simply a by product of the motion, IE if you didn't feel pain doesn't mean that if I stab you you won't bleed. Hope that makes sense.

Lets compare here; circumcision offers very little in the way of benefits (smaller HIV transmission chance, lower chance of infection, 'fitting in'), all of which can be helped later in life by learning to clean yourself and either using a condom or...you know, NOT having unprotected sex with someone who has HIV, which you shouldn't do regardless of your foreskin status. And, if you so chose to 'fit in' later in life, you have that right to decide for yourself, if I was held down against my will and forced to get a circumcision, I'd be VERY angry.

Compared to the cons. While there's a small, easily preventable risk, circumcision DOES reduce pleasure for the male by chopping off tens of thousands of nerve endings, as well as exposing the glans, making it dry and desensitized. Add to it the fact that circumcision comes with its own risks of unique infections and death (according to one poster here), there's really no balance. Circumcision is bad.

Hell, even the BENEFITS are hotly debated...for every positive study, there's an equally negative study, so even the perceived benefits aren't definite.

So that's why people don't accept that circumcision has medical benefits: It doesn't. There is no medical proof that says there ARE benefits, just that there might be.

I'm thinking of getting my dogs circumcised.

These types of threads are always fun to read the comments! (You better not disappoint me people.)

Lol glad you got that off your chest. Sometimes I need to rant as well, but it's not usually about the state of other people's dicks.

LMAO

Plenty of barbaric things in the world NEED to have people stand up and revolt against.  Just becuase this particular act of barbarism has to do with penises doesn't mean it gets the taboo vote of "leave it the fuck alone".  

YEAH......what he said is still funny though.