There is the double standard. Mario Kart 7 offers very little that makes it completely unique from the main Nintendo entries on console. It could very well have been on Wii without issue. Nintendo plays mind games because of the way they MARKET their games. They named it 7 so you feel it is important to the series. This is similar to FF spin offs. The fact that they do not have just a roman # in the title means they are by default inferior in the customer mind. THIS is why SE made FFXI and FFXIV numbered entries. 

IDK what makes gamers say this. Is it the genre? Are we simply biased to which genres travel from console to portable? Maybe, but some even condemn LBP being on Vita, saying it would be better on console. Yes, zelda games are usually unique experiences on portable....but OoT isn't. The only reason console IPs that go to portables ever really fully change their formula was simply because the handheld couldn't handle the full experience. For what handhelds cannot mimmick from the console counterpart, they simply come up with ways for the short comings. If they could, they would make them the same with very few tweaks. I don't see how that is a bad thing either.

Everytime someone says Vita's games are better on PS3 and then points to 3DS's....

• Mario Kart 7
• New Super Mario Bros 2
• Zelda:OoT
• Kingdom Hearts:DDD
• Resident Evil: Revelations
• Super Mario 3D Land

I no have need.

Nexus Tablet basically destroyed any reason I had to get a Vita.

well until Persona 4 Golden comes out at least.

I couldn't agree more forevercloud3000. People tend to have a lot of bias and misconception when it comes to portables. A game is a game no matter how you slice it or where you play it. I did not get a portable last gen because they offered mostly inferior games due to lack of power or controls. With Vita we truly have a handheld that on par with home consoles, with all of its extra trimmings. People say why get a Vita when you can get a PS3, I say why get a PS3 when you can get a Vita?

You may have said that, but I've gotten quite a few people just tell me that there is no price-cut needed whether it be now or ever. (Until the system get's older, of course.)

So no, I'm not twisting words.

As a Vita owner I don't think that device on it's own is too expensive. But when combined with Vita memory cards it gets pricey.

Honestly, for a device that has such a huge premise on downloadable content even offering a 4GB memory card as a most affordable option at this time and date is abysmal. For crying out loud even Wipeout DLC's are close to 800MB. And if you guys check the prices of MicroSD cards on Amazon, and see that for under 20$ you can get 32GB card...

They should slice prices of memory in half, and remove the 4GB model.

-PSP sucked and I don't play with it anymore

-No games

-Too expensive

-Games are all ports of PS3 games or remakes

-Hate Sony customer support

Do you expect me to care to remember? 

How should I know? It's their (yes, I did indeed but 'there' instead of 'their' ) mind, I was just hoping that they would expect a price-cut after at least 3 years (like all consoles) so I put that.

I'm hoping he means "No games that I like" or "Not enough games."

That's what I meant.  But I went a little radical :P