Why You No Get Vita? (Please take Poll)

[forevercloud3000]

IamAwsome said:

forevercloud3000 said:

1. Get a Job you Hippie (kidding)
2. How do you know this if you haven't tried them? Do you have a 3DS? If you do I am betting you own a Mario/1st Party NIN title or another which is also offered on console. Most of the 1st party offering from Sony have been stellar so far but mental prejudice/double standards like these are hindering them. If you get the chance just try U:GA,Gravity Rush, SS Delta, etc.
3. I can personally say you are completely correct on this one ut not for the reason u might think. It is just so expensive trying to get service with AT&T not to mention they are boarderline incompetent. It does have its functionality though 4G would have been better.
4. Legit.

1. I'm looking!!

2. What I mean, is that the experience is the EXACT SAME as it is on the PS3, at least that's the way it is with Uncharted and Wipeout. They're good games, but they would be better on the PS3. The experience isn't really changed on the Vita, and the PSP had pretty much the exact same problem outside of a few games, and if I recall, some devs didn't like that as well. 

I have a 3DS and Mario Kart 7, but the difference is Nintendo changes the experience from console to portable. You won't see a full on Twilight Princess style Zelda on the 3DS. Mario 3D Land is also different. I will admit there is some overlap, but not as much as there is on the PS2/PS3 and PSP/Vita. 

There is the double standard. Mario Kart 7 offers very little that makes it completely unique from the main Nintendo entries on console. It could very well have been on Wii without issue. Nintendo plays mind games because of the way they MARKET their games. They named it 7 so you feel it is important to the series. This is similar to FF spin offs. The fact that they do not have just a roman # in the title means they are by default inferior in the customer mind. THIS is why SE made FFXI and FFXIV numbered entries. 

IDK what makes gamers say this. Is it the genre? Are we simply biased to which genres travel from console to portable? Maybe, but some even condemn LBP being on Vita, saying it would be better on console. Yes, zelda games are usually unique experiences on portable....but OoT isn't. The only reason console IPs that go to portables ever really fully change their formula was simply because the handheld couldn't handle the full experience. For what handhelds cannot mimmick from the console counterpart, they simply come up with ways for the short comings. If they could, they would make them the same with very few tweaks. I don't see how that is a bad thing either.

Everytime someone says Vita's games are better on PS3 and then points to 3DS's....

• Mario Kart 7
• New Super Mario Bros 2
• Zelda:OoT
• Kingdom Hearts:DDD
• Resident Evil: Revelations
• Super Mario 3D Land

I will be sure to drive this same argument right into their juggular.