Jereel Hunter said:
I think it's because Sony's business model has always required them to sell to the masses - casual and hardcore - in order to work. PS1 and PS2 were very profitable - because they sold over 100M units each. PS3 is still on pace to lose money throughout the course of it's life (or it MAY break even by the end). Which is crazy for a system that's sold 65M units, and likely to sell 100M. The 360 overall is likely to be more profitable than the PS1 or PS2, but it will never eclipse, or even approach, their total unit sales. Were apple to throw their hat into the ring, it erodes Sony's marketshare even further - something their business model's have been thus far unable to handle. |
I don't think the 360 will be more profitable than PS1 or 2: first off, they were sold at a lose for the first years, and secondly: RROD cost MS half a BILLION dollars or something like that... But that's not the point we're talking about =)
I imagen a console from Apple would almost only get casual gamers, and that's not where the big money is at in gaming. Sure, they'd sell a ton of console, but fewer games (think "Wii"), and definetly not hardcore games. Well, not much of 'em anyways. Sure, that would leave Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo to fight over the core gamers - and one of those could surely go, but the market wouldn't be much different than how this generation has been.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.







