|
My bad, I thought you were talking more generally. Yeah, their tablet PC didn't do well. But I think Gateway sold a fair share of them to office workers.
|
The general consensus was that MS created it as a working proof of concept for hardware manufacturers to produce (presumably under license, I don't know), but it was a product that had minimal impact commercially, likely due to hardware constraints of the time.
Most offices that require a high level of portability and extended power management would be better served by the RT version of the Surface, which happens to compete directly with the iPad/iOS on a hardware and software functionality level. As a "light" version of Windows 8, it will not offer the same level of functionality as the Pro.
The Pro version is not likely to be a device that can be used all day unlike ARM SoC based tablets so that's a pretty significant restriction, making it more like an ultrabook than a tablet (with a 10 hour battery) in that respect. And, the Surface Pro is, for all intents and purposes, an ultrabook in tablet form with a flip over keypad and a kickstand.