hunter_alien said:
I did read it The thing is that we have a wonderfull new invention, that is called the internet. If you are interested, you CAN get plenty of info about movie release hype, waaaay before you where born Judging by Mordreds history, I think its a safe bet to assume that he actually has some clue about what hes talking about.
|
Hype is something you witness first-hand, not read about. I have an idea of what it was like to be around during the release of Star Wars because I've seen documentaries and read about it. But do I really know what it was like during that time? No, I do not. I have absolutely no frame of reference for what Star Wars was like compared to The Matrix or the prequels or Lord of the Rings. But I can compare the prequels, The Matrix, and Lord of the Rings to each other because I witnessed the hype and mania for each of those movies. I assume Star Wars mania was bigger than any of those movies but I don't really know for sure. Like anything else, people could be blowing it out of proportion.
You can go ahead and defend his argument (which he claimed with certainty, not leaving any room for doubt whatsoever) but those of us who have been around for awhile know better. He made a grandiose claim that The Avengers was undoubtedly the most hyped movie ever. I presented several points that contradicted that statement such as "it didn't release in the most theatres", "it didn't have the biggest opening day in history", and "Disney released it in early May, which is far from the peak season of Memorial Day through August". He ignored them. He's simply too young to know whether the The Phantom Menace was more hyped than The Avengers because he was four years old when it released, just as I cannot be sure where the original Star Wars falls on the hype scale. If he was using actual data to prove his point, his point might be more salient. He is making a factless claim made on historical observation, which is laughable coming from a 17 year old. That is the only reason I brought up his age. He is stating an opinion that is largely based on observational evidence drawn over a period of time. He is 17 years old. Do you see the problem with this?
The difference between me and Mordred is that I'm smart enough and honest enough to admit that I don't really know how hyped any movies were pre-1984 or so. And I'm certainly not going to claim that I know which movie was most hyped when I have no factual basis to do so.
Simple enough?