By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Star Wars Kinect was worked on by 10 teams, 200+ people

DirtyP2002 said:
Could it be that the standards on these forums are not ... Well in favour for this game. I will post something like "It will still be a piece of crap." In the next Killzone thread or whatever and see what happens.



Killzone is typically a high quality franchise. Youd be better comparing this to something else that looks equally as poor. Something like Tokyo Jungle.



                            

Around the Network
maverick40 said:
D-Joe said:
maverick40 said:
What a waste, should have took 100 staff off that and put them on a core title.

your reply sounds like make a good core title is easy job

besides,this game not develop by MS or LucasArts

100 people should be able to make a core game. Naughty dog made uncharted 2 with around 100 people.


well 85 people internally but they "did a lot of outsourcing" and had "several contractors helping us in the closing months" in addition to "Sony also has some amazing support groups that were instrumental in us completing the music, sound, and animation". All together there was likely more than 300 people working on Uncharted 2 if not more.

http://www.vg247.com/2009/10/16/uncharted-2s-wells-on-ps3-over-360-motion-controls-the-next-drake-game-and-more/



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

Carl2291 said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Could it be that the standards on these forums are not ... Well in favour for this game. I will post something like "It will still be a piece of crap." In the next Killzone thread or whatever and see what happens.



Killzone is typically a high quality franchise. Youd be better comparing this to something else that looks equally as poor. Something like Tokyo Jungle.


The game looks good enough for about 250k people who preordered this game in the US.

I don't get why it is okay to bash this game without any consequences. And of course this thread goes the same way like many MS threads before.

What happened to this one: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=141370&page=1

Let me quote it:

If you do not like something and will respond negatively (in a disruptive way) towards it, just don't post in the thread. If you don't like rap music, for example, don't immediately enter a rap-related thread and say it sucks. If you create a post which is critical of it, try to do so in a way that is conducive to discussion.




Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

Nobody is really "bashing" the game though, really. Aside from attoyou and maverick, but thats to be expected. Just report and move along.

From what I gather, its people surprised a game can look so bad, with so many people working on it.



                            

pezus said:
Barozi said:
kowenicki said:
pezus said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Could it be that the standards on these forums are not ... Well in favour for this game. I will post something like "It will still be a piece of crap." In the next Killzone thread or whatever and see what happens.

Except this is not just the opinion of us on these forums. Do you honestly think it looks well made?

Irrelevant.

This game wont be for me... it looks like it hasn't got the control system I would enjoy... and ... well... star wars is terrible, you cant polish a turd.

But that doesnt justify saying it is a "pile of crap" berfore it releases and is played.  By all means say it is a pile of crap, or preferably something more intelligent, once you have seen it and played it.  I know for a fact that if someone here jumped on a Sony game like this then he would be reported to death and probably be looking at a ban.  

You need to watch more Mythbusters !

Lol what did they do? Literally polish a turd?

indeed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiJ9fy1qSFI



Around the Network

I saw the trailer for this game on television and it honestly looks like shovelware. The controls looked terrible. I can't comprehend how it has so many pre-orders.



That seems like a lot of people for a game that will probably not sell into the multi-millions.

I think it pre-sold on name recognition and concept. But after that, if the reviews are poor, it will end up in the bargain bin quickly.

Mike from Morgantown



      


I am Mario.


I like to jump around, and would lead a fairly serene and aimless existence if it weren't for my friends always getting into trouble. I love to help out, even when it puts me at risk. I seem to make friends with people who just can't stay out of trouble.

Wii Friend Code: 1624 6601 1126 1492

NNID: Mike_INTV

The force is not with this one.



Kinect games may look like shovelware, but they're actually not. It's very fun to play even the most bad rated games, especially with other people. The only problem is that this fun hardly continues for a long time.

I'm kinda excited for this game, pretty sure it'll at least last more than other games and will possess the same kind of fun as other kinect titles. The kinda fun you don't care how accurate the game is or how responsive its controls are, it's just fun. And that fun is what the techical-review system we have today hates.



Carl2291 said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Could it be that the standards on these forums are not ... Well in favour for this game. I will post something like "It will still be a piece of crap." In the next Killzone thread or whatever and see what happens.



Killzone is typically a high quality franchise. Youd be better comparing this to something else that looks equally as poor. Something like Tokyo Jungle.

You think it's OK to hate on Tokyo Jungle? Reported!