I hope these effort will not come in to waste.
Yay!!!
Could it be that the standards on these forums are not ... Well in favour for this game. I will post something like "It will still be a piece of crap." In the next Killzone thread or whatever and see what happens.
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
| DirtyP2002 said: Could it be that the standards on these forums are not ... Well in favour for this game. I will post something like "It will still be a piece of crap." In the next Killzone thread or whatever and see what happens. |
I totally am in favor of it, for it's pretty sure to provide me with hours of entertainment (and to a degree it already did) for free ! :D
By all means yoU are inviTed to posT your mind in tHe next Killzone thread, bUt just make suRe you can live with The consequences :).
| maverick40 said: What a waste, should have took 100 staff off that and put them on a core title. |
your reply sounds like make a good core title is easy job
besides,this game not develop by MS or LucasArts
D-Joe said:
your reply sounds like make a good core title is easy job besides,this game not develop by MS or LucasArts |
100 people should be able to make a core game. Naughty dog made uncharted 2 with around 100 people.
And it looks like it'll suck balls.
Actually I will reserve judgement until after it comes out to be fair.
Super chunk wasn't the only one I also said that Kinect was going to be amazing but only for a small handfuls of genres. I am pretty sure their was other users as well who agreed.StarWars was at PAX last year It did not impress me at all. It might be okay for some children who don't really know what a good game is but it will not likely hold up with any real gamers
Sounds like Microsoft was pretty determined to attach Star Wars to Kinect something Nintendo did not do a good job with on Wii. I think Microsoft has the right idea but the wrong platform.
Nintendo should have helped fund and pushed Lucas Arts in a big way to bring a real full fledged exclusive Star Wars title to Wii but Nintendo did not. We will never know how such a title could have altered Nintendo's outcome. Maybe if it had been released a year into Wii it could have brought over and maintained some of the so called hardcore gamers.
In the end this is a mess. Their is no way Lucas Arts should have been wasting this much resources on such a shitty game.
Lucas Arts could have been spending the money on releasing a real game. Heck it wouldn't even have to be StarWars I wouldn't have minded a Red Tails game or even a new IP or a title based off one of Lucas Arts other IP.
It just seems like a massive waste of resources. I hope Microsoft is paying out the ying Yang for this game. The games best possible sales will be like 2-mill and that is very very doubtful. Lucas Arts could likely have brought us BattleFront3 for double the cost and would have turned a far far larger profit. In fact maybe a new entry in the Rogue Squadron series would have been good too. LucasArts has so many other titles they could develop with far more potential!
-JC7
"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer
maverick40 said:
100 people should be able to make a core game. Naughty dog made uncharted 2 with around 100 people. |
yeah if they're same level with ND
kowenicki said:
Irrelevant. This game wont be for me... it looks like it hasn't got the control system I would enjoy... and ... well... star wars is terrible, you cant polish a turd. But that doesnt justify saying it is a "pile of crap" berfore it releases and is played. By all means say it is a pile of crap, or preferably something more intelligent, once you have seen it and played it. I know for a fact that if someone here jumped on a Sony game like this then he would be reported to death and probably be looking at a ban. |
You need to watch more Mythbusters !
Barozi said:
You need to watch more Mythbusters ! |
lol yeah, I remmember that!
Yay!!!