Do you think the topless avatars are too much? | |||
| Yes | 145 | 40.50% | |
| No | 213 | 59.50% | |
| Total: | 358 | ||
Kantor said:
"Sexualised avatars are not allowed."
Does you seriously believe that pezus' avatar is not sexualised...? She looks like a dominatrix ffs
My prediction threads:
Wii U will sell under 40m units (made on 14th September 2012)
PS Vita will sell under 20m units (made on 30th September 2012)
Wii U will sell under 7m in 2013 - I was right
| man-bear-pig said: Kantor said: "Sexualised avatars are not allowed." Does you seriously believe that pezus' avatar is not sexualised...? She looks like a dominatrix ffs |
they have removed mine twice but not Pezuz. is bullsh*t tbh. aparenlty he is alright... HOW? Kantor has shown with this how good of a mod he is.
pezus said:
I want to know where you get your hardcore pornos. Listen to the mods and stop trying to cook up a storm @playstaion: It's not doing you any favours to go against my avatar. Be unhappy about yours being removed, sure, but stop trying to get mine removed as well |
if im going down im bringing everyone with me! *evil laugh*
well, my avatar has been around since 2008. It has help bring a lot of members to vgchartz.
Next Gen
| 11/20/09 04:25 | makingmusic476 | Warning | Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.) |
pezus said:
I want to know where you get your hardcore pornos. Listen to the mods and stop trying to cook up a storm |
No, because the mods are wrong. Your avatar is against the rules. It's really not rocket science
My prediction threads:
Wii U will sell under 40m units (made on 14th September 2012)
PS Vita will sell under 20m units (made on 30th September 2012)
Wii U will sell under 7m in 2013 - I was right
man-bear-pig said:
|
The mods cannot be wrong where the rules are concerned. His avatar is not against the rules.
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
Kantor said:
The mods cannot be wrong where the rules are concerned. His avatar is not against the rules. |
Yes it is.
Kantor said:
"Sexualised avatars are not allowed."
Does you seriously believe that pezus' avatar is not sexualised...? She looks like a dominatrix ffs
My prediction threads:
Wii U will sell under 40m units (made on 14th September 2012)
PS Vita will sell under 20m units (made on 30th September 2012)
Wii U will sell under 7m in 2013 - I was right
MBP's argument is weak.
Firstly, what size phone do you have that allows people to see avatars so easily? Most people aren't going to be close enough to make out any avatars. The only people who are going to be close enough to make out pictures on your phone are people who are right over your shoulder. And people who are right over your shoulder are probably close friends.
Secondly, I don't know what browsing software you use, but my Android browser allows me to zoom in. If the avatar problem was really a big problem, you could just zoom in and pan the screen to the right, blocking the avatars out of view, only making text visible.
Finally, if people do manage to see the 'sexy' avatars on your phone, they're probably going to be considerably close to you, since you're on a phone. In which case, there's a simply solution: just tell those people that you're on a forum and some people have sexy avatars. If you show them that you're on a forum and not a gay site, yet they still think you're looking at gay porn, then that's a problem with stupidity, not website regulation.
I don't see any problem with these avatars.
| Jay520 said: MBP's argument is weak. Firstly, what size phone do you have that allows people to see avatars so easily? Most people aren't going to be close enough to make out any avatars. The only people who are going to be close enough to make out pictures on your phone are people who are right over your shoulder. And people who are right over your shoulder are probably close friends. Secondly, I don't know what browsing software you use, but my Android browser allows me to zoom in. If the avatar problem was really a big problem, you could just zoom in and pan the screen to the right, blocking the avatars out of view, only making text visible. Finally, if people do manage to see the 'sexy' avatars on your phone, they're probably going to be considerably close to you, since you're on a phone. In which case, there's a simply solution: just tell those people that you're on a forum and some people have sexy avatars. If you show them that you're on a forum and not a gay site, yet they still think you're looking at gay porn, then that's a problem with stupidity, not website regulation. |
This
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
