This means war. 

I am starting the Resistance, KATE UPTON BIKINI AVATARS FOR ALL!!!!!!

Ok, if you prefer dudes, get like Ryan Gosling or whoever has the sexiest moobs, don't know, not my style. 

i bet nobody would care about this pic. i mean, he is topless! but who cares as long as he has a fking weapon to kill people in his hand and his naked skin is not the message of the pic!

I'm taking matters into my own hands!

Moderation - Warning

You are receiving this message for violation of forum rules regarding Other (Your avatar is showing some skin, please change it.) Please review the forum rules here to avoid future moderation action.

it's just funny how most who are against topless pics wouldn't have a problem with this pic. erotic isn't the most important part of that pic so it's not a bad pic for them. the message of the pic is a guy killing some people in a few minutes how should this be worse than a pic made to attract some people.

I've already sent 2 of 'em, don't think I won't send any more!!

The Resistance knows no moderation!  Seriously, I am not changing this avatar, it is beautiful, not degrading or obscene.  Now give your girlfriend the orgasm that she needs (this is why she is worried, you arent pleasing her and she saw topless men, leading her to believe you are gay) and get off of this stupid quest for Puritanism. 

crissindahouse said: Roma said: I wonder if people think men are gay because they walk on the beach with other topless men if it would be only on the beach but every second is topless in the own garden everyone can look at. next time i will use a jacket in the sun because there are people under 18 who pass my garden   i understand now what they mean with "huge porn industry but very prude in real life"   i mean, i have two guys and a little girl with GUNS in my sig and really nobody would care about that but if i would have a woman with bikini or man topless it would be "too much" and "this site is meant for people under 18 as well" that's crazy! yeah they aren't real but what's with a pic of rambo with a weapon or so? nobody would care! what's our nature, born naked  or a weapon in the hand?

sigs can be blocked. I think many people do this alreday because sigs are so long, and many just dont look good while browsing. There is no option to block avatars. That is all we need.

LMAO!

I do think that an option to disable is the BEST solution because it covers all bases. The people that are truely offended/worried about these avatars (which I suspect are in the minority) can be placated an dnothing changes for the rest of the population.

What about Cloud, Squall and Noctis avatars? Don't they make you uncomfortable too?

thranx said: crissindahouse said: Roma said: I wonder if people think men are gay because they walk on the beach with other topless men if it would be only on the beach but every second is topless in the own garden everyone can look at. next time i will use a jacket in the sun because there are people under 18 who pass my garden   i understand now what they mean with "huge porn industry but very prude in real life"   i mean, i have two guys and a little girl with GUNS in my sig and really nobody would care about that but if i would have a woman with bikini or man topless it would be "too much" and "this site is meant for people under 18 as well" that's crazy! yeah they aren't real but what's with a pic of rambo with a weapon or so? nobody would care! what's our nature, born naked  or a weapon in the hand? sigs can be blocked. I think many people do this alreday because sigs are so long, and many just dont look good while browsing. There is no option to block avatars. That is all we need.

that wasn't my message. my message was that 90% of people who don't like those bikini pics or guy pics wouldn't say anything against rambo (movie for adults shwoing someone killing people) or a pic of a gun (a weapon wtf). the option to block an avatar pic as well like the sig is legitimate, no prob with that.