Michael-5 said:
Aldro said:
Gears of War 3 was NOT the runner up in 2011. Battlefield 3 was. True story. I personally don't find it all that good looking, but thats the way it is. I got the facts to prove it
I like how you think The last of us wont look good based on one video (which by the way blew a lot of people and had ND confirm several times was captured with a PS3). Then again, the fact that you constantly pull facts out of your ass which are straight out lies and then show pictures of 360 exclusives that are laughable is truly outstanding.
|
Crysis 2, Battlefield 3, and Gears 3 all got runner ups on various websites.
As for The Last of Us...From what I've seen it looks sub Uncharted 3, but it's still far from release.
As for lies, I only speak the truth, you just need to learn to accept other people have a different view then you. You put Gears 3 at #5, I put it at #3 (I still think Forza 4 looks better then anything else), that's the difference, accept it.
|
Gears 3 DID NOT WIN A SINGLE Best GRAPHICS award of 2011. GO ahead and give me a list of how many you can find!
Battlefield 3 won about 6-7.
Unless you can find 2x the amount of runner up awards for Gears of War 3, I suggest you gtfo with "X Y and Z all got runner ups". Im sure there are sites that gave it runner up, but I AM TALKING ABOUT A MAJORITY OF SITES = COMPILATON OF AWARDS globally:
Uncharted 3 dominated with 20+.
What you have seen is a 2 minute long clip of a game that hasnt got a release date. And many including I disagree. I personally am Emo because I love the Uncharted franchise and I don't want TLOU to look better. Yes, that's a fanboy indeed ^^.
You can put Gears #1 I don't give a shit, but you are straight out lying by saying that it was the Runner Up to 2011's best graphics when it infact didnt win SQUAT! I have a list of 0 awards for it, I want you to extend that; So please go ahead!
I've already told you my stand on what I personally feel to be the best games. What I keep arguing about is what the MAJORITY of CRITICS have GIVEN the most AWARDS to. Not Runner Ups but naturally a Runner Up would be a game that has won the SECOND amount of best graphic awards because it gave the first game a run for its money!
Clearly this obvious way of seeing things will obliterate your agenda thus you are forced to expand the runner ups into many games rather than simply the one that came second. And like that wasnt enough, you are giving awards to "runner ups" rather than winners. And like THAT wasnt enough, you are not using the majority of websites because that STILL isnt helping you.
So once again:
Aldro = ALL sites, Based on WINNING an Award thus One game as winner, One game as runner up.
Michael-5 = ONE or FEW sites, Based on RUNNER UP on these thus One or Many games as winner, MANY games as runner up.
Oh man... I'm.. speechless.