By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aldro said:
Michael-5 said:
Aldro said:
 


Gears of War 3 was NOT the runner up in 2011. Battlefield 3 was. True story. I personally don't find it all that good looking, but thats the way it is. I got the facts to prove it

I like how you think The last of us wont look good based on one video (which by the way blew a lot of people and had ND confirm several times was captured with a PS3). Then again, the fact that you constantly pull facts out of your ass which are straight out lies and then show pictures of 360 exclusives that are laughable is truly outstanding.

Crysis 2, Battlefield 3, and Gears 3 all got runner ups on various websites.

As for The Last of Us...From what I've seen it looks sub Uncharted 3, but it's still far from release.

As for lies, I only speak the truth, you just need to learn to accept other people have a different view then you. You put Gears 3 at #5, I put it at #3 (I still think Forza 4 looks better then anything else), that's the difference, accept it.

So once again:
Aldro = ALL sites, Based on WINNING an Award thus One game as winner, One game as runner up. Extrapolation. Using Best Graphics Awards for old years, and claiming they still hold. I may as well say Gears of War 1 or The Elder Scrolls Oblivion look as good as Unchated 3 as they won Best Graphics in 2006.
Michael-5 = ONE or FEW sites, Based on RUNNER UP on these thus One or Many games as winner, MANY games as runner up. Many award winning, only runners up for 2011.

Oh man... I'm.. speechless. Me too, you actually think your opinion has some statistical weight. While you present a good arguement, I really don't see any reason for thinking PS3 exclusives in general look better then 360's. Look at Digital Foundry or Lens of Truth, games like Gears of War 3 come damn close to Uncharted 3, and that alone says enough. You can't claim MGS4, best graphics of what 2008? looks better then runner up to 2011. There is no reason to assume that, it's all subjective, and regardless the difference is small.

Anyway we ended this a while ago. You said UC3>UC2>GoW3>___(forget, maybe KZ3?)>Gears 3>MGS4/Crysis 2/KZ2/Others

I say Forza 4>UC3>Gears 3>KZ3/Crysis 2/GoW3/MGS4/ Others (Maybe battlefield 3, but I haven't played that off PC).

Why do you need your opinion to be right? Is it so hard to accept others view things differently?

Geez, the PS3 fanbase is strong, can't say anything a hint neutral, must always be PS3 is King....If PS3 is king graphically, and the difference is so huge, why aren't PS3 sales well ahead of 360's? Cause the difference is a joke.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results