Both are great. Both are prophets of Islam. It is duty of every Muslim to respect both of them without any discrimination and to say "Peace be upon him" after their names.

They both had an awesome impact on the World. To deny them, call them names or even irrelevant as koweni puts it is laughable. They are very relevant to 3.7 billion Christians and Muslims, which is more than half the World's population last I checked.

OP - as a muslim myself (by name at least), I was raised to love and respect all prophets. My background knowledge with prophet Mohamed is a lot deeper though. I know more about his than Jesus'... due to that bias, I have to say Mohamed (PBUH).  Though I admit, Jesus had the greater impact on people. That's just stupid to deny.

as a side rant --

I wish people could learn to stop flaming, offending other people's gods, beliefs and disbeliefs. It always has to come down to one side claiming superiority over the other with petty insults and attacks on beliefs.

Just respect people's opinions and beliefs ... don't go out of your way to offend people. That is all.

LMAO, HAHAHHAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAA

This one did it for me. Im a christian anyway and I go for Jesus. 

Muhammad had slaves, muhammad had sex with a 9 year old girl when he was 53 years old, muhammad was a warlord.

Jesus gave his life for others and thats the greatest thing you can do...

Heres a good comparison with sources of both the Bible and the quran:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Jesus-Muhammad.htm

Read it, than judge.

Google the word tagyya, muslims are allowed to lie when its good for the spread of their religion, NEVER believe what a muslim says to you.

Please, buy the quran and read it for yourself.

Just two examples of  what muhammad really said:

"Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah" (Ibn ishaq 992)

"I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there  is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad  is the messenger of Allah" (Muslim 1:33)

There are more many more quotes like that, both from the quran and the hadiths (the word of allah and the word of muhammad respectively)

Its no contradiction that 80% of religious people who are persecuted because of their beliefs ae christians and most of them who are oppressed are the ones in islamic countries.

tell me one thing you are not offended by ;)

If this thread was a game in the DB, I would -without a shame- delete it >_>

That's pretty extreme. This thread is about explaining why you believe one prophet is better than the other, not generalize and spread hate about muslims. I believe mods gave a clear warning about this type of posting early in the thread.

All that aside. I think you mean taqiyya. which literally means to conceal. Basically, a muslim was permitted to deny or even renounce their belief if it meant their or their family's lives were at risk. This is a rather old practice, and was more common among shias who were small in number back in the day.

You posted: "Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah"

This is a common/frequent verse taken out of context.  This is only during war -muslims are under physical attack. You know, when people are trying to kill you.

Here's the full context “Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith.” [Al-Qur’an 2:190-191]

I really hate to have religious debates on the forums ... sigh. But the following verse is also out of context.

You posted: "I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there  is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad  is the messenger of Allah"

This is only in an islamic state, not in an act of war. Basically, in an Islamic state, non muslims residing in that land (christians, jews, etc) were offered submission to islam, if they refused, they had to pay a tax called the jizya. They could live there as long as they payed the jizya, and they were protected. If they wanted to live and not pay the jizya, they were unfortunately imprisoned. Not the women and children though, they were forgiven as were poor people.

Here's the full verse you took out of context.

"I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, perform the Prayer, and pay Zakah. If they do that, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah."

Which further proves my point.

Again: How anyone can defend this heavily obsolete belief is beyond me. I can understand if you defend its believers as obviously not all of them follow each word of the Koran, but the actual Koran should be burned given all barbarous and inhuman content it contains. (I'd say the same about the Bible btw.)

Its interesting to see how a Jesus vs Muhammad thread has devolved into a an attack on Muhammad. All I will say on this is that it was the norm for the time (as many have already mentioned) and that in fact Aisha was a very powerful woman in Islam who was actively involved in the politics,made speeches and fought in battles.

With regards to the original thread topic, as a muslim Muhammad has had a much greater influence on me though they both clearly had a huge effect on future generations.