STUPID THREAD
KEEP DREAMING NINTENDO FAGGOTS.............oh, wait
STUPID THREAD
KEEP DREAMING NINTENDO FAGGOTS.............oh, wait
I'm sick of this crap. Vita is going to do quite well for itself, it will likely make a profit, and will sell approximately as much as the PSP. For Sony to go up against Nintendo twice, where no other company has ever managed to do it once is amazing.
Why must we delude ourselves into thinking Vita has a chance of winning? It will only lead to disappointment when it fails to happen, and believe me, Vita will not have disappointing sales.
VicViper said:
Of course sales are important. It raises the chances of great games in the future for the console! Or do you think Vita pleases the eyes of let's say Yuji Hori selling 10k per week in japan? Or do you think sony is willing to invest how many millions on the next uncharted if the thing is not selling very well? Sales are everything, so they equal quality! But of course both can do well! |
I totally agree with you, but I think what you might be trying to say is that quality generally leads to sales (at an appeal level), and sales usually leads to quality offerings (at a business decision level).
But they aren't really equal, because there have been cases of games of high quality which have sold poorly, and games of low quality which have sold beyond what they deserve (cough COD *ughhh*), but also some games which do not have the right sales strategy continue to get made due to poor business reasons, and sometimes in order to bolster sales companies may go with a lower quality offering (where in certain cases less quality or effort may lead to sales).
sethnintendo said: Seriously though... I feel where he is coming from. I was probably labeled just as disillusioned back in the mid 2000 when I swore Nintendo was on a comeback. I was mainly laughed at and I suppose that is the fate karma had in store for Sony fans. They were never really good sports in the "console wars" and they got what they deserved. Having their favorite company make mistake after mistake last gen only helped worsen things for them. They just had a terrible "plan" for the start of the generation. They finally got their head out of their ass but it was too late. They still ended up decently but nowhere near where they should have if they actually had a good plan for this home console generation. |
Whether the two are similar depends on the details. When you made your proclamations, did you have any evidence to support you? Or were your ideas like Gilgamesh's, i.e. a load of drivel that's completely devoid of facts and contradictions, completely divorced from reality?
An argument can be made for gilgamesh's position. But that requires more than mere assertions, most of which fly in the face of reality, and the rest of which are dependent on wishful thinking. It's not his theory that's amusing, it's his approach.
noname2200 said:
Whether the two are similar depends on the details. When you made your proclamations, did you have any evidence to support you? Or were your ideas like Gilgamesh's, i.e. a load of drivel that's completely devoid of facts and contradictions, completely divorced from reality? An argument can be made for gilgamesh's position. But that requires more than mere assertions, most of which fly in the face of reality, and the rest of which are dependent on wishful thinking. It's not his theory that's amusing, it's his approach. |
Ah, what's with all the fancy condescending words? When you make people feel like junk in style, do you get bonus points?
happydolphin said:
Ah, what's with all the fancy condescending words? When you make people feel like junk in style, do you get bonus points? |
Sure. Add to that my own terrible grammar in the bolded, and I call it a good post all around.
I stand by the sentiment though. Consider it my own small, futile effort to encourage certain posters to improve their posting.
noname2200 said:
Sure. Add to that my own terrible grammar in the bolded, and I call it a good post all around. I stand by the sentiment though. Consider it my own small, futile effort to encourage certain posters to improve their posting. |
Haha Good, at least you made me smirk.
zero129 said:
Is his words too hard for you to understand??. Why not answer his points instead of giving a sly, but dumb remark.. |
Oh geez, I know the guy. I don't need to answer his points if he wants he can even ask me by PM or whatevs. Plus, what point did he make apart from saying Seth was fabulating. It was up to Seth to defend his position, not me. Zero... smh
I was just giving him a hard time. If he wants to debate, he knows we still have our Seaman thread
atma998 said:
I added some corrections, just for fun :) |
Hey Gilgamesh, nothing to add?