By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
noname2200 said:

Whether the two are similar depends on the details. When you made your proclamations, did you have any evidence to support you? Or were your ideas like Gilgamesh's, i.e. a load of drivel that's completely devoid of facts and contradictions, completely divorced from reality?

An argument can be made for gilgamesh's position. But that requires more than mere assertions, most of which fly in the face of reality, and the rest of which are dependent on wishful thinking. It's not his theory that's amusing, it's his approach.

Ah, what's with all the fancy condescending words? When you make people feel like junk in style, do you get bonus points?