Third parties go wherever MonHun is .
My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)

Third parties go wherever MonHun is .
My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)

happydolphin said:
You're forgetting that the attach ratio for the PSP was really low for a core handheld:
Odds are, the PSP wasn't all that used for gaming, but many used it for music, movies, and loading up emulators via homebrew. The DS had numbers not as high as the Wii or HD twins, but it was a handheld that sold almost 2.5 times the number of PSPs, and many of those sold to casual users.
What I'm trying to say is, PSP hardware did well, but SW, apart from GTA, FF:CC and MH, didn't do so so crazy. |
You're forgetting that's not his point. PSP took Nintendo Marketshare. Most successful non-nintendo handheld ever.
Sure let's applause nintendo again for being so successful, but let's stay on topic too.


maverick40 said:
It ended quite well for the psp actually. It stole an incredible amount of market share from Nintendo, who previously had a monopoly on the handheld market. |
The thing the PSP did manage to take from the DS was more 3rd party AAA effort and core big-name games. With that, marketshare was yanked from under the DS' feet, but it wasn't really absorbed by the PSP in return, as SW sales would show. There are exceptions, but in general it's more 3rd party effort that was stolen than marketshare (when looking at it from a SW point of view).
RolStoppable said:
Wrong. The DS couldn't run this games due to its lack of processing power, so the PSP took those development dollars from some other platform. That would be the PS3, the supposed successor of the PS2. The PSP cannibalized the PS3 in Japan. |
Funny, cause now those games are being released on the 3DS.
I didn't realize you needed to have the best processing power to have the best games, I thought you only needed the best market share.
Oddly enough though, for certain titles that do need good graphics, the 3DS now has the power to run them too. So is the 3DS cannibalizing the PS3? or the PSP? Then is the 3DS now stealing Sony marketshare? (this is rhetorical)
RolStoppable said:
Yes, it means exactly that. Nintendo is in the process of absorbing a significant slice of Sony's market. The DS couldn't, but the 3DS can. |
moving upstream.
Funny how things I say about disruption come true.


Nem said:
You have to understand that 3rd parties want to make money and doesnt fall onto them to support the hardware to increase sales. Nintendo did something about the 3DS, Sony has to do something about the Vita themselves. .... From a 3rd party point of view, whose purpose is to survive/make a profit. The 3DS is the logical choice. Furthermore, i think that due to the fact that the 3DS is reaching foreign markets aswell, its a much better venue to port old PSP titles that never sold much in the west due to the PSP's failure. I'm pretty sure theres good money to be made just porting things like FF7CC, FFtype zero, Kingdom Hearts BBS, FFT, Y's, etc, aswell as Gamecube and Playstation 2 games.... |
If they want money abandoning PSV is stupid move.
Sony ecosystem is much friendlier than Nintendo for bringing niche small titles overseas - not only it is region free but with huge push for digital sales you can release titles only digitally reducing costs and you mantain presence of your games on the market for years without reprints.
Instead they choose to crowd on Nintendo platform squished beetwen Nintendo own titles and 3rd party super sellers like MH or RE
PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB
thekitchensink said:
|
I'm trying.
Dr.Grass said:
|
I thought your post was well said Grass.
But kitchen sink was just joking.


I very highly doubt Vita will do any better then psp did in the west.
your crazy if you think vita has any chance of out selling Nintendo 3ds . . theres plenty of doubt going on in the gamespot forums , and they all point to the truth . no one wants to play call of duty modern warfare 3 or uncharted on a handheld if they can get a better version on A cheaper alternative(ps3) they will so do it just like psp before if this is all vita can offer then it's a safe bet that it will be like psp in the west and pick up steam in japan at a later time
and psp had third party support? no more like it got ports and more ports . the nintendo ds had more third party support then psp just look at how many games came out for it vs psp . the strongest titles psp has is=gta and those were quickly ported to ps2 . and driver 76 . also starwars games and sports games . but ds had got goldeneye/ other 007 games vita only haD 1 007 TITLE IN ITS ENTIRE RUN ---FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE DS HAD 4 -GOLDENEYE rogue agent quantum of solace blood stone and goldeneye not to mention the sims series call of duty -again no one wanted the later so ..
you can only imagine what it will do on vita-no different
| goldeneye0074eva2222 said: I very highly doubt Vita will do any better then psp did in the west. your crazy if you think vita has any chance of out selling Nintendo 3ds . . theres plenty of doubt going on in the gamespot forums , and they all point to the truth . no one wants to play call of duty modern warfare 3 or uncharted on a handheld if they can get a better version on A cheaper alternative(ps3) they will so do it just like psp before if this is all vita can offer then it's a safe bet that it will be like psp in the west and pick up steam in japan at a later time |
It also doesn't help that barely anyone in the U.S.A. knows what a VITA is.