By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - "Mass Effect 3 is Better With Kinect" Say Some People

oniyide said:
SvennoJ said:
oniyide said:
kain_kusanagi said:
I really don't understand why people are so against Kinect. As far as I know MS has not been forcing anyone to use Kinect. If you don't want to give verbal commands in ME3, I suggest you don't. And while your holding your tongue it would be nice if hold it when Kinect topics pop up. If you don't like it, fine, but stop bitching about it.


I dont think there so much against it as they are dissapointed by it.  MS did make it look alot better than it does now, overall. I MSs defense, thats what they do, thats what most companies do. If anyone thought for a second that the Kinect was going to be the way it was in NATAL stages then they just werent thinking right IMHO

Exactly. They showed us project Milo type interaction, and we get simple voice commands.


I think they could have done the MILO thing IMHO, i believe the tech does exist, but it would have been to expensive. do you wow people with super tech knowing that they cant afford it? Or do you gut the thing and expand to as large audience as possible?? damned if you do damned if you dont. I would have loved to see Natal but in retrospect I think they did the right thing

I'm not so sure that what they suggested with MILO actually works, but something intermediary was already done in Starship Titanic in 1998. (and to a lesser extent in many adventure games before it)

"One of the most significant parts of the game is the conversation engine (dubbed "Spookitalk") used to interact with the robot staff on board the ship. Players type what they wish to say into the Personal Electronic Thing (PET) at the bottom of the screen. The robots' responses appear as text in the PET and are also spoken. The conversation engine works by interpreting user input and selecting relevant pre-recorded speech responses.

The Spookitalk engine was developed exclusively for the game by creator Douglas Adams and several programmers from The Digital Village, the company working with Adams to develop the game. The engine incorporates over 10,000 different phrases, pre-recorded by a group of professional voice actors. The recorded phrases would take over 14 hours to play back-to-back."

This is what I would like to see with voice input. Get rid of the list of preselected responses. Let me figure out myself what the relevant questions and responses are. Much better then selecting a stub which turns to come out quite differently then you had expected.
Maybe text to speech is not good enough yet, or takes too much processing power. Hopefully next gen we'll get more flexible conversation systems. I always thought it a step backwards when games discarded text input and offered a couple of preset options instead.



Around the Network
monkeymonk65 said:
Kinect is an abomination. It makes NOTHING better. Nothing!!!

How about using your media? Searching for marketplace content? Getting your non-gamer parents to take an interest in your entertainment choices? Getting one step closer for your girlfriend to be a core gamer? Having a alcohol fuelled party? Hybrid games like Forza 4, Ghost Recon and ME3?

Or are you simply hating on an inanimate piece of plastic because its successful and your not part of the Xbox camp? Take your pick. 



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

SvennoJ said:
oniyide said:
kain_kusanagi said:
I really don't understand why people are so against Kinect. As far as I know MS has not been forcing anyone to use Kinect. If you don't want to give verbal commands in ME3, I suggest you don't. And while your holding your tongue it would be nice if hold it when Kinect topics pop up. If you don't like it, fine, but stop bitching about it.


I dont think there so much against it as they are dissapointed by it.  MS did make it look alot better than it does now, overall. I MSs defense, thats what they do, thats what most companies do. If anyone thought for a second that the Kinect was going to be the way it was in NATAL stages then they just werent thinking right IMHO

Exactly. They showed us project Milo type interaction, and we get simple voice commands.

Well for whiney core gamers who just nag like old wives (lol)...kinect implementation like this is small yet contributes positively to gameplay. 



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Jazz2K said:
SvennoJ said:
oniyide said:
kain_kusanagi said:
I really don't understand why people are so against Kinect. As far as I know MS has not been forcing anyone to use Kinect. If you don't want to give verbal commands in ME3, I suggest you don't. And while your holding your tongue it would be nice if hold it when Kinect topics pop up. If you don't like it, fine, but stop bitching about it.


I dont think there so much against it as they are dissapointed by it.  MS did make it look alot better than it does now, overall. I MSs defense, thats what they do, thats what most companies do. If anyone thought for a second that the Kinect was going to be the way it was in NATAL stages then they just werent thinking right IMHO

Exactly. They showed us project Milo type interaction, and we get simple voice commands.

LMAO

So because of this thinking, modest implementation in regular games is bad... you people are funny. Hey would you rather Bioware to abandon controllers all together and deliver a broken game... like Star Wars Kinect? I prefer when they take their time and master functions by functions first. Making great games with great concepts requires time, yeah people, time is necessary and Kinect has been out 1 1/2 year... how much time does it needs to produce a GOW/Uncharted/Halo... yeah exactly!

Motion tracking and voice recognition are two different functionalities. 

Yeah, exactly.



Yay!!!

sales2099 said:
SvennoJ said:
oniyide said:
kain_kusanagi said:
I really don't understand why people are so against Kinect. As far as I know MS has not been forcing anyone to use Kinect. If you don't want to give verbal commands in ME3, I suggest you don't. And while your holding your tongue it would be nice if hold it when Kinect topics pop up. If you don't like it, fine, but stop bitching about it.


I dont think there so much against it as they are dissapointed by it.  MS did make it look alot better than it does now, overall. I MSs defense, thats what they do, thats what most companies do. If anyone thought for a second that the Kinect was going to be the way it was in NATAL stages then they just werent thinking right IMHO

Exactly. They showed us project Milo type interaction, and we get simple voice commands.

Well for whiney core gamers who just nag like old wives (lol)...kinect implementation like this is small yet contributes positively to gameplay. 

For MS fans who cant stop taking their koolaid...MS did make it look better, intially than it acutally was no one is saying that this small contribution doesnt add to gameplay, most of us anyway and LOL to whoever thinks that Kinect games will make anyone's girlfriend a core gamer, not gonna happen. Didnt happen with Wii



Around the Network
SvennoJ said:
oniyide said:
SvennoJ said:
oniyide said:
kain_kusanagi said:
I really don't understand why people are so against Kinect. As far as I know MS has not been forcing anyone to use Kinect. If you don't want to give verbal commands in ME3, I suggest you don't. And while your holding your tongue it would be nice if hold it when Kinect topics pop up. If you don't like it, fine, but stop bitching about it.


I dont think there so much against it as they are dissapointed by it.  MS did make it look alot better than it does now, overall. I MSs defense, thats what they do, thats what most companies do. If anyone thought for a second that the Kinect was going to be the way it was in NATAL stages then they just werent thinking right IMHO

Exactly. They showed us project Milo type interaction, and we get simple voice commands.


I think they could have done the MILO thing IMHO, i believe the tech does exist, but it would have been to expensive. do you wow people with super tech knowing that they cant afford it? Or do you gut the thing and expand to as large audience as possible?? damned if you do damned if you dont. I would have loved to see Natal but in retrospect I think they did the right thing

I'm not so sure that what they suggested with MILO actually works, but something intermediary was already done in Starship Titanic in 1998. (and to a lesser extent in many adventure games before it)

"One of the most significant parts of the game is the conversation engine (dubbed "Spookitalk") used to interact with the robot staff on board the ship. Players type what they wish to say into the Personal Electronic Thing (PET) at the bottom of the screen. The robots' responses appear as text in the PET and are also spoken. The conversation engine works by interpreting user input and selecting relevant pre-recorded speech responses.

The Spookitalk engine was developed exclusively for the game by creator Douglas Adams and several programmers from The Digital Village, the company working with Adams to develop the game. The engine incorporates over 10,000 different phrases, pre-recorded by a group of professional voice actors. The recorded phrases would take over 14 hours to play back-to-back."

This is what I would like to see with voice input. Get rid of the list of preselected responses. Let me figure out myself what the relevant questions and responses are. Much better then selecting a stub which turns to come out quite differently then you had expected.
Maybe text to speech is not good enough yet, or takes too much processing power. Hopefully next gen we'll get more flexible conversation systems. I always thought it a step backwards when games discarded text input and offered a couple of preset options instead.

True, but i was thinking more inlines of the actual motion tech, voice recognition is a secondary function to Kinect so I wasnt sure if MS would really add too much to that anyway



I have serious doubts about that claim... To say the least.



Jazz2K said:
SvennoJ said:
oniyide said:
kain_kusanagi said:
I really don't understand why people are so against Kinect. As far as I know MS has not been forcing anyone to use Kinect. If you don't want to give verbal commands in ME3, I suggest you don't. And while your holding your tongue it would be nice if hold it when Kinect topics pop up. If you don't like it, fine, but stop bitching about it.


I dont think there so much against it as they are dissapointed by it.  MS did make it look alot better than it does now, overall. I MSs defense, thats what they do, thats what most companies do. If anyone thought for a second that the Kinect was going to be the way it was in NATAL stages then they just werent thinking right IMHO

Exactly. They showed us project Milo type interaction, and we get simple voice commands.

LMAO

So because of this thinking, modest implementation in regular games is bad... you people are funny. Hey would you rather Bioware to abandon controllers all together and deliver a broken game... like Star Wars Kinect? I prefer when they take their time and master functions by functions first. Making great games with great concepts requires time, yeah people, time is necessary and Kinect has been out 1 1/2 year... how much time does it needs to produce a GOW/Uncharted/Halo... yeah exactly!

Well it's a start, just a disappointing one. As I said in my other post I was hoping for voice control to be used in the conversation system to get closer to the level of interactivity we had in the 90's. Instead it seems they're only focussing on the combat, which is my least favorite part of the game.



SvennoJ said:
Jazz2K said:
SvennoJ said:
oniyide said:
kain_kusanagi said:
I really don't understand why people are so against Kinect. As far as I know MS has not been forcing anyone to use Kinect. If you don't want to give verbal commands in ME3, I suggest you don't. And while your holding your tongue it would be nice if hold it when Kinect topics pop up. If you don't like it, fine, but stop bitching about it.


I dont think there so much against it as they are dissapointed by it.  MS did make it look alot better than it does now, overall. I MSs defense, thats what they do, thats what most companies do. If anyone thought for a second that the Kinect was going to be the way it was in NATAL stages then they just werent thinking right IMHO

Exactly. They showed us project Milo type interaction, and we get simple voice commands.

LMAO

So because of this thinking, modest implementation in regular games is bad... you people are funny. Hey would you rather Bioware to abandon controllers all together and deliver a broken game... like Star Wars Kinect? I prefer when they take their time and master functions by functions first. Making great games with great concepts requires time, yeah people, time is necessary and Kinect has been out 1 1/2 year... how much time does it needs to produce a GOW/Uncharted/Halo... yeah exactly!

Well it's a start, just a disappointing one. As I said in my other post I was hoping for voice control to be used in the conversation system to get closer to the level of interactivity we had in the 90's. Instead it seems they're only focussing on the combat, which is my least favorite part of the game.


Hmm... I think I did see somewhere that you could just say the sentence of your choice in conversations instead of using the controller. If I remember correctly voice integration wasn't only about combat.

We'll get there eventually but these things require time and knowledge. I think they have to get as many possibilities first then get everything to work on Kinect (and mics). A separate dev team would be necessary just to make the conversation part.



If Kinect is going to be used I think I'd rather see it used in a way that doesn't feel like it's just tacked on. The Kinect has some really really cool tech in it - it'd be good if they used it as more than essentially as just a microphone.